This study examined the asymmetrical relationship between attitudes toward interracial marriage and social dominance orientation across four ethnic groups in the United States. Differences in these correlations were explained with the ideological asymmetry hypothesis, a specific feature of social dominance theory, which asserts that the relationship between attitudes regarding hierarchy-maintaining social practices and antiegalitarian social values will be more positive among members of high-status groups than among members of low-status groups. Using opposition to interracial marriage and dating (i.e., antimiscegenation attitudes) as a case of a hierarchy-maintaining social attitude, the data were found to support the ideological asymmetry hypothesis. With almost no exceptions, the correlations between social dominance orientation and antimiscegenation attitudes were significantly more positive within a high-status ethnic group vis-à-vis a given low-status ethnic group than they were within a low-status ethnic group vis-à-vis a given high-status ethnic group. The theoretical implications of these findings are discussed.
References
1.
Bahr, H. M. , & Chadwick, B. A. (1974). Conservatism, racial intolerance and attitudes toward racial assimilation among whites and American Indians. Journal of Social Psychology, 94, 45-56.
2.
Barron, M. L. (1946). People who intermarry. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
3.
Biegel, H. G. (1966). Problems and motives in interracial marriage. Journal of Sex Research, 2, 185-205.
4.
Blau, P. M. , Becker, A., & Fitzgerald, K. M. (1984). Intersecting social affiliations and intermarriage. Social Forces, 62, 585-605.
5.
Blau, P. M. , Blum, T. C., & Schwartz, J. E. (1982). Heterogeneity and intermarriage. American Sociological Review, 47,45-62.
6.
Bobo, L. D. , Johnson, J. H., Oliver, M. L., Sidanius, J., & Zubrinsky, C. (1992). Public opinion before and after a spring of discontent: A preliminary report on the 1992 Los Angeles County Social Survey. Los Angeles: University of California-Los Angeles, Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Science Research.
7.
Bossard, J.H.S. (1939). Nationality and nativity as factors in marriage. American Sociological Review, 4, 792-798.
8.
Bugelski, B. R. (1961). Assimilation through intermarriage. Social Forces, 40, 148-153.
9.
Burma, J. H. (1963). Interethnic marriage in Los Angeles, 1948-1959. Social Forces, 42, 156-165.
10.
Catapusan, B. T. (1938). Filipino intermarriage problems in the United States. Sociology and Social Research, 22, 265-272.
11.
Clark, K. B. , & Clark, M. P. (1947). Racial identification and preference in Negro children. In T. M. Newcomb & E. L. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology. (pp. 169-178). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
12.
Cretser, G. A. (1967). An investigation of interethnic marriage in Los Angeles County (1950-1961) and its relation to selected demographic factors. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Southern California.
13.
Ellemers, N. , Van Knippenberg, A., de Vries, N., & Wilke, H. (1988). Social identification and permeability of group boundaries. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 497-513.
14.
Ellemers, N. , Van Knippenberg, A., & Wilke, H. (1990). The influence of permeability of group boundaries and stability of group status on strategies of individual mobility and social change. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 233-246.
15.
Ellemers, N. , Wilke, H., & Van Knippenberg, A. (1993). Effects of the legitimacy of low group or individual status on individual and collective status-enhancement strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(5), 766-778.
16.
Freeman, L. (1955). Homogamy in interethnic mate selection. Sociology and Social Research, 39, 369-377.
17.
Golden, J. (1959). Facilitating factors in Negro-White intermarriage. Phylon, 20, 273-284.
18.
Greenwell, M. , Strohm, M., & Bobo, L. (1994). Project memoranda: Non-response bias evaluation. Unpublished manuscript, University of California-Los Angeles, Department of Sociology.
19.
Grier, W. H. , & Cobbs, P. M. (1968). Black rage. New York: Basic Books.
20.
Harding, J. , Proshansky, H., Kutner, B., & Chein, I. (1969). Prejudice and ethnic relations. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology. (2nd ed., Vol. 5, pp. 1-76). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
21.
Heer, D. M. (1966). Negro-White marriage in the United States. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 28, 262-273.
22.
Heer, D. (1974). The prevalence of Black-White marriage in the United States, 1960 and 1970. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 36,246-258.
23.
Kennedy, R.J.R. (1944). Single or triple melting pot? Intermarriage trends in New Haven, 1870-1940. American Journal of Sociology, 49, 331-339.
24.
Levin, S., Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1997). Social dominance orientation, ingroup favoritism and ethnic status: Beyond the asymmetrical ingroup bias effect. Unpublished manuscript.
25.
Lewin, T. (1992, January 8). Study points to increase in tolerance of ethnicity. New York limes, A10.
26.
Marcson, S. (1950). A theory of intermarriage and assimilation. Social Forces, 29, 75-78.
27.
Mercer, G. W. , & Cairns, E. (1981). Conservatism and its relationship to general and specific ethnocentrism in Northern Ireland. British Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 13-16.
28.
Merton, R. K. (1941). Intermarriage and the social structure: Fact and theory. Psychiatry, 4, 361-374.
29.
Mitchell, M. , & Sidanius, J. (1993). Group status and asymmetry in the relationship between ideology and death penalty support: A social dominance perspective. National Journal of Sociology, 7,67-93.
30.
Monohan, T. (1976). An overview of statistics on interracial marriage in the United States, with data on its extent from 1963-1970. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 223-231.
31.
Murdock, G. P. (1949). Social structure. New York: Macmillan.
32.
O'Neil, M. J. (1979). Estimating the non-response bias due to refusals in telephone surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 43, 218-232.
33.
Panunzio, C. (1942). Intermarriage in Los Angeles, 1924-1933. American Journal of Sociology, 47, 690-701.
34.
Parkman, M. A. , & Sawyer, J. (1967). Dimensions of ethnic intermarriage in Hawaii. American Sociological Review, 32, 593-608.
35.
Pedhazur, E. J. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and predictio. (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
36.
Porterfield, E. (1982). Black-American intermarriage in the United States. Marriage and Family Review, 5, 17-34.
37.
Pratto, F. , Liu, J. H., Levin, S., Sidanius, J., Shih, M., & Bachrach, H. (1996). Social dominance orientation and legitimization of inequality across cultures. Manuscript submitted for publication.
38.
Pratto, F. , Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67,741-763.
39.
Price, C. A. , & Zubrzycki, J. (1962). The use of inter-marriage statistics as an index of assimilation. Population Studies, 16, 58-69.
40.
Resnik, R. B. (1933). Some sociological aspects of intermarriage of Jew and non-Jew. Social Forces, 11, 94-102.
41.
Schoen, R. , & Wooldredge, J. (1989). Marriage choices in North Carolina and Virginia, 1969-71 and 1979-81. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 465-481.
42.
Shulman, G. I. (1974). Race, sex and violence: A laboratory test of the sexual threat of the Black male hypothesis. American Journal of Sociology, 79, 1260-1277.
43.
Sidanius, J. (1993). The psychology of group conflict and the dynamics of oppression: A social dominance perspective. In S. Iyengar & W. McGuire (Eds.), Explorations in political psychology. (pp. 183-219). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
44.
Sidanius, J. , & Pratto, F. (1993). The inevitability of oppression and the dynamics of social dominance. In P. Sniderman & P. Tetlock (Eds.), Prejudice, politics, and the American dilemm. (pp. 173-211). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
45.
Sidanius, J. , Pratto, F., & Bobo, L. (1994). Social dominance orientation and the political psychology of gender: A case of invariance?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67,998-1011.
46.
Sidanius, J. , Pratto, F., & Rabinowitz, J. (1994). Gender, ethnic status, in-group attachment and social dominance orientation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25, 194-216.
47.
Spickard, P. R. (1989). Mixed blood. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
48.
Stember, C. H. (1976). Sexual racism: The emotional barrier to an integrated society. New York: Harper.
49.
Van den Berghe, P. L. (1960). Hypergamy, hypergenation and miscegenation. Human Relations, 13, 83-89.
50.
Van Knippenberg, A. , & Ellemers, N. (1990). Social identity and intergroup differentiation processes. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology. (Vol. 1, pp. 137-169). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
51.
Yamamoto, G. K. (1973). Interracial marriage in Hawaii. In I. R. Stuart & L. E. Abt (Eds.), Interracial marriage: Expectations and realitie. (pp. 309-321). New York: Grossman.
