The accuracy of prediction of three mixed dentition analyses was compared. Hixon and Oldfather's method was found to be the most accurate. A simplified version of the analysis obviates referral to a table, allowing assessment of the size of the unerupted teeth prior to eruption of the lateral incisor.
References
1.
Hixon, E.H., and Oldfather, R.E.: Estimation of the Sizes of Unerupted Cuspid and Bicuspid Teeth, Angle Orthod28:236-240, 1958.
2.
Moyers, R.E. : Handbook of Orthodontics for the Student and General Practitioner (3rd ed), Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, 1973, p 369.
3.
Tanaka, M.M. , and Johnston, L.E.: The Prediction of the Size of Uneruppted Can-ines and Premolars in a Contemporary Orthodontic Population , JADA88:798, 1974.
4.
Ballard, M.L. , and Wylie, W.L.: Mixed Dentition Case Analysis-Estimating the Size of Unerupted Permanent Teeth, Am J Orthod33:754-759, 1947.
5.
Bolton, W.A. : Disharmony in Tooth Size and Its Relation to the Analysis and Treat; ment of Malocclusion, Angle Orthod28: 113-130, 1958.
6.
Stahle, H.: Determination of Mesiodistal Crown Width of Unerupted Permanent Cuspids and Bicuspids, Helv Odontol Acta3: 14-17, 1959.
