AlexanderP. A. (2003). Profiling the developing reader: The interplay of knowledge, interest, and strategic processing. In FairbanksC. M., WorthyJ., MalochB., HoffmanJ. V., SchallertD. L. (Eds.), The Fifty-first Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 47–65). Oak Creek, WI: National Reading Conference.
2.
AndermanE. M., EcclesJ. S., YoonK. S., RoeseerR., WigfieldA., & BlumenfeldP. (2001). Learning to value mathematics and reading: Relations to mastery and performance-oriented instructional practices. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 76–95.
3.
AndersonV (1992). A teacher development project in transactional strategy instruction for teachers of severely reading disabled adolescents. Teaching & Teacher Education, 8, 391–403.
4.
ApplebeeA., LangerJ., MullisI., LathamA., & GentileC. (1994). NAEP 1992: Writing report card.Washington, D.C.: US Government Printing Office.
5.
ArmstrongB., & LarsonC. N. (1995). Students' use of part-whole and direct comparison strategies for comparing partitioned triangles. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 2–19.
6.
BaddeleyA (2003). Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communicative Disorders, 36, 189–208.
7.
Baker-WardL., OrnsteinP. A., & HoldenD. J. (1984). The expression of memorization in early childhood. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 37, 555–575.
8.
BaronJ. B., & SternbergR. J. (1987). Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice.New York: Henry Holt.
9.
BarrouilletP., & FayolM. (1998). From algorithmic computing to direct retrieval: Evidence from number and alphabetic arithmetic in children and adults. Memory and Cognition, 26, 355–368.
10.
BelmontJ. C., & ButterfieldE. C. (1977). The instructional approach to developmental cognitive research. In KailR. V., & HagenJ. W. (Eds.), Perspectives on the development of memory and cognition (pp. 437–481). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11.
BelmontJ. M., ButterfieldE. C., & FerrettiR. P. (1982). To secure transfer of training: Instruct self-management skills. In DettermanD. K., & SternbergR. J. (Eds.), How and how much can intelligence be increased? (pp. 147–154). Norwood NJ: Ablex.
12.
BereiterC., & BirdM. (1985). Use of thinking aloud in identification and teaching of reading comprehension strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 131–156.
13.
BereiterC., & ScardamaliaM. (1982). From conversation to composition: The role of instruction in a developmental process. In GlaserR. (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 1–64). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14.
BjorklundD. F. (Ed.). (1990). Children's strategies: Contemporary views of cognitive development.Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15.
BoalarJ (1998). Open and closed mathematics: Student experiences and understanding. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 42–62.
16.
BorkowskiJ. G., CarrM., RellingerE. A., & PressleyM. (1990). Self-regulated strategy use: Interdependence of metacognition, attributions, and self-esteem. In JonesB. F. (Ed.), Dimensions of thinking: Review of research (pp. 53–92). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17.
BrownR., PressleyM., Van MeterP., & SchuderT. (1996). A quas-iexperimental validation of transactional strategies instruction with low-achieving second grade readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 18–37.
ButlerD. L., ElaschukC. L., & PooleS. (2000). Promoting strategic writing by postsecondary students with learning disabilities: A report of three case studies. Learning Disability Quarterly, 23, 196–213.
20.
ButterfieldE. C., HackerD. J., & AlbertsonL. R. (1996). Environmental, cognitive, and metacognitive influences on text revision: Assessing the evidence. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 239–297.
21.
CainK., OakhillJ., & BryantP. (2004). Children's reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 31–42.
22.
Cariglia-BullT., & PressleyM. (1990). Short-term memory differences between children predict imagery effects when sentences are read. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 49, 384–398.
23.
CarneyR. N., & LevinJ. R. (1998). Do mnemonic memories fade as time goes by? Here's looking anew!Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 276–297.
24.
CarneyR. N., & LevinJ. R. (2003). Promoting higher-order learning benefits by building lower-order mnemonic connections. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 563–575.
25.
CarpenterT. P., FrankeM. L., JacobsV. R., FennemaE., & EmpsonS. B. (1998). A longitudinal study of invention and understanding in children's multidigit addition and subtraction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 3–20.
26.
CarrollW. M. (1997). Results of third-grade students in reform curriculum on the Illinois state mathematics test. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 237–242.
27.
ChallJ. S. (1967). Learning to read: The great debate.New York: McGraw-Hill.
28.
ChamotA. U. (1999). How children in language immersion programs use learning strategies. In KassenM. A. (Ed.), Language learners of tomorrow: Process and promise!Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company.
29.
ChamotA. U., DaleM., O'MalleyJ. M., SpanosG. A. (1993). Learning and problem solving strategies of ESL students. Bilingual Research Quarterly, 16, 1–38.
30.
ChamotA. U., & El-DinaryP. B. (1999). Children's learning strategies in immersion classrooms. The Modern Language Journal, 83, 319–341.
31.
ChamotA. U., & O'MalleyJ. M. (1996). The Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach: A model for linguistically diverse classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 96, 259–273.
32.
CharlesR. I., & LesterF. K.Jr. (1984). An evaluation of a process-oriented instructional program in mathematical problem solving in grades 5 and 7. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15, 15–34.
33.
ChristouC., & PhilippouG. (1998). The developmental nature of the ability to solve one-step word problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 436–442.
34.
CohenA. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language.London: Longman.
35.
CollinsC (1991). Reading instruction that increases thinking abilities. Journal of Reading, 34, 510–516.
36.
CoyleT. R., ReadL. E., GaultneyJ. F., & BjorklundD. F. (1998). Giftedness and variability in strategic processing on a multitrial memory task: Evidence for stability in gifted cognition. Learning and Individual Differences, 10, 273–290.
37.
CramerK. A., PostT. R., & delMasR. C. (2002). Initial fraction learning by fourth- and fifth-grade students: A comparison of the effects of using the rational number project curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33, 111–144.
38.
CuvoA. J. (1975). Developmental differences in rehearsal and free recall. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 19, 265–278.
39.
DeLoacheJ. S., CassidyD. J., & BrownA. L. (1985). Precursors of mnemonic strategies in very young children's memory. Child Development, 56, 125–137.
40.
DixonJ. A., & MooreC. F. (1996). The developmental role of intuitive principles in choosing mathematical strategies. Developmental Psychology, 32, 241–253.
41.
DurkinD (1978–79). What classroom observations reveal about reading comprehension instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 481–533.
42.
EnglertC., RaphaelT., & AndersonL. (1992). Socially mediated instruction: Improving students' knowledge and talk about writing. Elementary School Journal, 92, 411–445.
43.
EnglertC., RaphaelT., AndersonL., AnthonyH., StevenD., & FearK. (1991). Making writing and self-talk visible: Cognitive strategy instruction writing in regular and special education classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 337–373.
44.
EricssonA., & SimonH. A. (Eds.). (1993). Protocol analysis, Revised edition: Verbal protocols as data.Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
45.
FlavellJ. H. (1970). Developmental studies of mediated memory. In ReeseH. W., & LipsittL. P. (Eds.), Advances in child development and behavior: Vol. 5 (pp. 181–211). New York: Academic Press.
46.
FlavellJ. H., BeachD. H., & ChinskyJ. M. (1966). Spontaneous verbal rehearsal in a memory task as a function of age. Child Development, 37, 283–299.
47.
FuchsD., FuchsL. S., ThompsonA., OtaibaS. A., YenY., YangN. J., BraunM., & O'ConnorR. E. (2001). Is reading important in reading-readiness programs? A randomized field trial with teachers as program implementers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 251–267.
48.
FuchsL. S., & FuchsD. (2003). Enhancing the mathematical problem solving of students. In SwansonH. L., HarrisK. R., & GrahamS. (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 306–322). New York: Guilford.
49.
FuchsL. S., FuchsD., PrenticeK., BurchM., HamlettC. L., OwenR., & SchroeterK. (2003a). Enhancing third-grade students' mathematical problem solving with self-regulated learning strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 306–315.
50.
FuchsL. S., FuchsD., PrenticeK., BurchM., HamlettC. L., OwenR., HospM., & JancekD. (2003b). Explicitly teaching for transfer: Effects on third-grade students' mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 293–305.
51.
FusonK. C., CarrollW. M., & DrueckJ. V. (2000). Achievement results for second and third graders using the standards-based curriculum Everyday Mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 277–295.
52.
GrahamS (in press). Strategy instruction and the teaching of writing: A meta-analysis. In MacArthurC., GrahamS., & FitzgeraldJ. (Eds.), Handbook of writing research.New York: Guilford.
53.
GrahamS., & HarrisK. R. (1994). The role and development of self-regulation in the writing process. In SchunkD., & ZimmermanB. (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 203–228). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
54.
GrahamS., & HarrisK. R. (2000). The role of self-regulation and transcription skills in writing and writing development. Educational Psychologist, 35, 3–12.
55.
GrahamS., & HarrisK. R. (2003). Students with learning disabilities and the process of writing: A meta-analysis of SRSD studies. SwansonL., HarrisK. R., & GrahamS. (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning disabilities (pp. 323–344) New York: Guilford.
56.
GrahamS., & HarrisK. R., & ZitoJ. (in press). Promoting internal and external validity: A synergism of laboratory experiments and classroom based research. In PhyeG., RobinsonD., LevinJ. (Eds.), Experimental methods for educational intervention.San Diego, CA: Elvieser.
57.
GruenenfelderT. M., & BorkowskiJ. G. (1975). Transfer of cumulative-rehearsal strategies in children's short-term memory. Child Development, 46, 1019–1024.
58.
GrunebergM. M. (1998). A commentary on criticism of the keyword method of learning foreign languages. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 12, 529–532.
59.
GuttmanJ., LevinJ. R., & PressleyM. (1977). Pictures, partial pictures, and children's oral prose learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 473–480.
60.
HaakeR. J., SommervilleS. C., & WellmanH. M. (1980). Logical ability of young children in searching a large-scale environment. Child Development, 51, 1299–1302.
61.
HackerD. J., & TenentA. (2002). Implementing reciprocal teaching in the classroom: Overcoming difficulties and making accommodations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 699–718.
62.
HagenJ. W., HargraveS., & RossW. (1973). Prompting and rehearsal in short-term memory. Child Development, 44, 201–04.
63.
HarrisK. R. (1982). Cognitive-behavior modification: Application with exceptional students. Focus on Exceptional Children, 15, 1–16.
64.
HarrisK. R., & GrahamS. (1992). Self-regulated strategy development: A part of the writing process. In PressleyM., HarrisK. R., & GuthrieJ. T. (Eds.), Promoting academic competence and literacy in school (pp. 277–309). New York: Academic Press.
65.
HarrisK. R., GrahamS., & AdkinsM. (2004). The effects of teacher-led SRSD instruction on the writing and motivation of young struggling writers. Manuscript under preparation.
66.
HarrisK. R., GrahamS., & MasonL. (2004). Improving the writing performance, knowledge, and motivation of struggling writers in second grade: The effects of self-regulated strategy development. Manuscript submitted for publication.
67.
HayesJ (2004). What triggers revision? In AllalL. Chanquoy, & LargyP. (Eds.), Revision: Cognitive and instructional processes (pp. 9–20). Boston: Kluwer.
68.
HayesJ., & FlowerL. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In GreggL., & SteinbergE. (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3–30). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
69.
HechtS. A. (2002). Counting on working memory in simple arithmetic when counting is used for problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 30, 447–455.
70.
HembreeR (1992). Experiments and relational studies in problem solving: A meta-analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23, 242–273.
71.
HenningsenM., & SteinM. K. (1997). Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 524–549.
72.
HollarJ. C., & NorwoodK. (1999). The effects of a graphing-approach intermediate algebra curriculum on students' understanding of function. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 220–226.
73.
HornJ. L., & CattellR. B. (1967). Age differences in fluid and crystallized intelligence. Acta Psychologica, 26, 107–129.
74.
HoskynM., & SwansonH. L. (2003). The relationship between working memory and writing in younger and older adults. Reading and Writing, 16, 759–784.
75.
HuntleyM. A. (2000). Effects of standards-based mathematics education: A study of the core-plus mathematics project algebra and functions strand. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 328–361.
76.
KeeneyF. J., CannizzoS. R., & FlavellJ. H. (1967). Spontaneous and induced verbal rehearsal in a recall task. Child Development, 38, 953–966.
77.
KingsleyP. R., & HagenJ. W. (1969). Induced versus spontaneous rehearsal in short-term memory in nursery school children. Developmental Psychology, 1, 4–46.
78.
KobasigawaA (1977). Retrieval strategies in the development of memory. In KailR. V., & HagenJ. W. (Eds.), Perspectives on the development of memory and cognition (pp. 177–201). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
79.
KuhnD (1991). The skills of argument.Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
80.
KuhnD (1995). Microgenetic study of change: What has it told us?Psychological Science, 6, 133–139.
81.
KuhnD., AmselE., O'LoughlinM., SchaubleL., LeadbeaterB., & YotiveW. (1988). The development of scientific thinking skills.San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
82.
KuhnD., Garcia-MilaM., ZoharA., & AndersenC. (1995). Strategies of knowledge acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 60, (Vol. 128).
83.
KuhnD., & UdellW. (2003). The development of argument skills. Child Development, 74, 1245–1260.
84.
LampertM (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
85.
LangeG., MacKinnonC. E., & NidaR. E. (1989). Knowledge, strategy, and motivational contributions to preschool childrens' object recall. Developmental Psychology, 25, 772–779.
86.
LawsonM. J., & HogbenD. (1998). Learning and recall of foreign-language vocabulary: Effects of a keyword strategy for immediate and delayed recall. Learning and Instruction, 8, 179–194.
87.
LovettM. W., BarronR. W., & BensonN. J. (2003). Effective remediation of word identification and decoding difficulties in school-age children with reading disabilities. In SwansonH. L., HarrisK. R., & GrahamS. (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 273–292). New York: Guilford.
88.
LovettM. W., LacerenzaL., BordenS. L., FrijtersJ. C., SteinbachK. A., & De PalmaM. (2000). Components of effective remediation for developmental reading disabilities: Combining phonological and strategy-based instruction to improve outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 263–283.
89.
MandlerJ. M. (1998). Representation. In DamonW. (Editor-in-chief) & D. Kuhn & R. S. Siegler (Volume eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 2. Cognition, perception, and language (5th ed., pp. 255–308). New York: Wiley.
90.
MarksM., PressleyM. in collaboration with ColeyJ. D., CraigS., GardnerR., RoseW., & DePintoT. (1993). Teachers' adaptations of reciprocal teaching: Progress toward a classroom-compatible version of reciprocal teaching. Elementary School Journal, 94, 267–283.
91.
MasonL. H. (2004). A multi-component self-regulated strategy approach for expository reading comprehension and writing for students with and without disabilities who struggle with reading and writing: Examination of effects in reading and content classrooms. Field Initiate Research Grant, funded by the Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
92.
MastropieriM. A., ScruggsT. E., & ShiahS. (1991). Mathematics instruction for learning disabled students: A review of research. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 6, 89–98.
93.
MayerR. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning?American Psychologist, 59, 14–19.
94.
McCaffreyD. F., HamiltonL. S., StecherB. M., KleinS. P., & RobynA. E. (2001). Interactions among instructional practices, curriculum, and student achievement: The case of standards-based high school mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 493–517.
95.
McLaughlinB., & HerediaR. (1996). Information-processing approaches to research on second language acquisition and use. In RitchieW. C., & BhatiaT. K. (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 213–228). San Diego: Academic Press.
96.
MeichenbaumD., & BiemillerA. (1998). Nurturing independent learners: Helping students take charge of their learning.Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
97.
MillerD (2002). Reading with meaning: Teaching comprehension in the primary grades.Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
98.
MillerG. A., GallanterE., & PribramK. H. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior.New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
99.
MillerP. H., & SeierW. L. (1994). Strategy utlization deficiencies in children: When, where, and why. In ReeseH. W. (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior: Vol. 25 (pp. 107–156). New York: Academic Press.
100.
MontagueM., & BosC. S. (1986). The effect of cognitive strategy training on verbal math problem solving performance of learning disabled students. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 26–33.
101.
MorrisD., TynerB., & PerneyJ. (2000). Early steps: Replicating the effects of a first-grade reading intervention program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 681–693.
102.
National Commission on Writing (2003). The neglected “R.”New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
103.
National Reading Panel (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction.Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Child Health and Development.
104.
NausM. J., OrnsteinP. A., & AivanoS. (1977). Developmental changes in memory: The effects of processing time and rehearsal instructions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 23, 237–251.
105.
NewmanL. S. (1990). Intentional and unintentional memory in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 50, 243–258.
106.
NikolR., LevinJ. R., & WoodwardM. M. (2003). Do pictorial mnemonic text-learning aids give students something worth writing about?Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 327–334.
107.
O'MalleyJ. M., & ChamotA. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition.Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
108.
O'MalleyJ. M., ChamotA. U., & KupperL. (1989). Listening comprehension strategies in second language education. Applied Linguistics, 10(4), 418–437.
109.
107th U.S. Congress (2002). Public Law 107–110: The no child left behind act of 2001.Washington D.C.: Goverrment Printing Office.
110.
OrnsteinP. A., NausM. J., & LibertyC. (1975). Rehearsal and organizational processes in children's memory. Child Development, 46, 818–830.
111.
O'SullivanJ. T., & PressleyM. (1984). Completeness of instruction and strategy transfer. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 275–288.
112.
PalincsarA. S., & BrownA. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175.
113.
ParisS. G., LipsonM. Y., & WixsonK. K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 293–316.
114.
PearsonP. D., & FieldingL. (1991). Comprehension instruction. In BarrR., KamilM. L., MosenthalP. B., & PearsonP. D. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research: Vol. II (pp. 815–860). New York: Longman.
115.
PerkinsD. N., LochheadJ., & BishopJ. (Eds.). (1987). Thinking: The second international conference.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
116.
PolyaG (1957). How to solve it.New York: Doubleday.
117.
PressleyM (1977). Imagery and children's learning: Putting the picture in developmental perspective. Review of Educational Research, 47, 586–622.
118.
PressleyM (1986). The relevance of the good strategy user model to the teaching of mathematics. Educational Psychologist, 21, 139–161.
119.
PressleyM (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In KamilM. L., MosenthalP. B., PearsonP. D., & BarrR. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, Vol. III (pp. 545–561). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
120.
PressleyM., & AfflerbachP. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
121.
PressleyM., BorkowskiJ. G., & O'SullivanJ. T. (1985). Children's metamemory and the teaching of strategies. In Forrest-PressleyD. L., MacKinnonG. E., & WallerT. G. (Eds.), Metacognition, cognition, and human performance (pp. 111–153). Orlando FL: Academic Press.
122.
PressleyM., BorkowskiJ. G., & SchneiderW. (1987). Cognitive strategies: Good strategy users coordinate meta-cognition and knowledge. In VastaR., & WhitehurstG. (Eds.), Annals of child development, Vol. 4 (pp. 89–129). Greenwich CT: JAI Press.
123.
PressleyM., Cariglia-BullT., DeaneS., & SchneiderW. (1987). Short-term memory, verbal competence, and age as predictors of imagery instructional effectiveness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 43, 194–211.
124.
PressleyM., & El-DinaryP. B. (1997). What we know about translating comprehension strategies instruction to practice. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(5), 486–488.
125.
PressleyM., El-DinaryP. B., GaskinsI., SchuderT., BergmanJ. L., AlmasiJ., & BrownR. (1992). Beyond direct explanation: Transactional instruction of reading comprehension strategies. Elementary School Journal, 92, 511–554.
126.
PressleyM., Forrest-PressleyD., Elliott-FaustD. L., & MillerG. E. (1985). Children's use of cognitive strategies, how to teach strategies, and what to do if they can't be taught. In PressleyM., & BrainerdC. J. (Eds.), Cognitive learning and memory in children (pp. 1–47). New York: Springer-Verlag.
127.
PressleyM., & HarrisK. R. (2001). Cognitive strategies instruction. In CostaA. L. (Ed.), Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking (3rd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
128.
PressleyM., HeiselB. E., McCormickC. G., & NakamuraG. V. (1982). Memory strategy instruction with children. In BrainerdC. J., & PressleyM. (Eds.), Progress in cognitive development research, Vol. 2, Verbal processes in children (pp. 125–159). New York: Springer-Verlag.
129.
PressleyM., & HildenK. R. (in press-a). Cognitive strategies: Production deficiencies and successful strategy instruction everywhere. In KuhnD., & SieglerR. (Eds.) W. Damon & R. Lerner (Series Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 2: Cognition, perception, and language (6th ed.) Hoboken NJ: Wiley.
130.
PressleyM., & HildenK. A. (in press-b). Verbal protocols of reading. In DukeN. K., & MalletteM. H. (Eds.), Literacy research methodologies.New York: Guilford.
131.
PressleyM., JohnsonC. J., SymonsS., McGoldrickJ. A., & KuritaJ. A. (1989). Strategies that improve memory and comprehension of what is read. Elementary School Journal, 90, 3–32.
132.
PressleyM., & LevinJ. R. (1977). Developmental differences in subjects' associative learning strategies and performance: Assessing a hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 24, 431–439.
133.
PressleyM., LevinJ. R., & DelaneyH. D. (1982). The mnemonic keyword method. Review of Educational Research, 52, 61–91.
134.
PressleyM., & MacFadyenJ. (1983). The development of mnemonic mediator usage at testing. Child Development, 54, 474–479.
135.
PressleyM., Wharton-McDonaldR., MistrettaJ., & EchevarriaM. (1998). The nature of literacy instruction in ten grade-4/5 classrooms in upstate New York. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 159–191.
136.
RabinowitzM (2002). The procedural-procedural knowledge distinction. In SteinN. L., BauerP. J., & RabinowtizM. (Eds.). (2002). Representation, memory, and development: Essays in honor of Jean Mandler. (pp. 185–198). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
137.
ReeseH. W. (1962). Verbal mediation as a function of age level. Psychological Bulletin, 59, 502–509.
138.
ReysR., ReysB., LapanR., HollidayG., & WasmanD. (2003). Assessing the impact of standards-based middle grades mathematics curriculum materials on student achievement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34, 74–95.
139.
RiordanJ. E., & NoyceP. E. (2001). The impact of two standards-based mathematics curricula on student achievement in Massachusetts. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 368–398.
140.
RosenshineB., & MeisterC. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of nineteen experimental studies. Review of Educational Research, 64, 479–530.
141.
RubinJ (1979). What a ‘good language learner’ can teach us. In PrideJ. B. (Ed.), Sociolinguistic aspects of language learning and teaching (pp. 17–26). London: Oxford University Press.
142.
RuddellR. B., & UnrauN. J. (2004). Theoretical models and processes of reading, 5th ed.Newark DE: International Reading Association.
143.
ScardamaliaM., & BereiterC. (1986). Written composition. In WittrockM. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. (3rd ed., pp. 778–803). New York: Macmillan.
144.
SchlagmuellerM., & SchneiderW. (2002). The development of organizational strategies in children: Evidence from a microgenetic longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 81, 298–319.
145.
SchneiderW., & PressleyM. (1997). Memory development between two and twenty, 2nd ed.Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
146.
SchoenfeldA (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In GrouwsD. A. (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334–370). New York: Macmillan.
147.
SieglerR. S. (1996). Emerging minds: The process of change in children's thinking.New York: Oxford University Press.
148.
SwansonH. L., & SáezL. (2003). Memory difficulties in children and adults with learning disabilities. In SwansonH. L., HarrisK. R., & GrahamS. (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 182–198). New York: Guilford.
149.
TaylorB. M., PearsonP. D., ClarkK., & WalpoleS. (2000). Effective schools and accomplished teachers: Lessons about primary-grade reading instruction in low-income schools. Elementary School Journal, 101, 121–165.
150.
ThompsonD. R., & SenkS. L. (2001). The effects of curriculum on achievement in second-year algebra: The example of the University of Chicago Mathematics Project. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 58–84.
151.
ThompsonI., & RubinJ. (1996). Can strategy instruction improve listening comprehension?Foreign Language Annals, 29, 331–342.
152.
VandergriftL (2003). Orchestrating strategy use: Toward a model of the skilled second language listener. Language Learning, 53, 463–496.
153.
VannR. J., & AbrahamR. G. (1990). Strategies of unsuccessful language learners. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 177–198.
154.
WangA. Y., & ThomasM. H. (1995). The effect of keywords on long-term retention: Help or hindrance?Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 468–475.
155.
WangA. Y., & ThomasM. H. (1999). In defence of keyword experiments: A reply to Gruneberg's commentary. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 283–287.
156.
WeinsteinC. E. (1994). Students at risk for academic failure: Learning to learn classes. In PrichardK. W., & SawyerR. M. (Eds.), Handbook of college teaching: Theory and applications.Westport, CT: Greenwood.
157.
WeinsteinC. E., HusmanJ., & DierkingD. R. (2000). Self-regulation interventions with a focus on learning strategies. In BoekaertsM., & PintrichP. R. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation.San Diego: Academic Press.
158.
WongB. Y. L., ButlerD. L., FiczereS. A., & KuperisS. (1996). Teaching adolescents with learning disabilities and low achievers to plan, write, and revise opinion essays. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 197–212.
159.
WongB. Y. L., ButlerD. L., FiczereS. A., KuperisS. (1997). Teaching adolescents with learning disabilities and low achievers to plan, write, and revise compare-and-contrast essays. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 12, 2–15.
160.
WongB. Y. L., ButlerD. L., FiczereS. A., KuperisS., & CordenM. (1994). Teaching problem learners revision skills and sensitivity to audience through two instructional modes: Student-teacher versus student-student interactive dialogues. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 9, 78–90.
161.
WongB. Y. L., HarrisK. R., GrahamS., & ButlerD. L. (2003). Cognitive strategies instruction research in learning disabilities. In SwansonH. L., HarrisK. R., & GrahamS. (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 383–402). New York: Guilford.
162.
WongB. Y. L., WongR., DarlingtonD., & JonesW. (1991). Interactive teaching: An effective way to teach revision skills to adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 6, 117–127.
163.
Woody-DorningJ., & MillerP. (2001). Children's individual differences in capacity: Effects on strategy production and utilization. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 19, 543–557.
164.
ZhangZ., & SchummJ. S. (2002). Exploring effects of the keyword method on limited English proficient students' vocabulary recall and comprehension. Reading Research and Instruction, 39, 202–221.