Deaf children have traditionally been perceived and educated as a special needs population. Over the past several decades, several factors have converged to enable a shift in perspective to one in which deaf children are viewed as a cultural and linguistic minority, and the education of deaf children is approached from a bilingual framework. In this article, we present the historical context in which such shifts in perspective have taken place and describe the linguistic, social, and cultural factors that shape a bilingual approach to deaf education. We further discuss the implications of a linguistic and cultural minority perspective of deaf children on language development, teacher preparation, and educational policy.
References
1.
AllenT. E. (1986). Patterns of academic achievement among hearing impaired students: 1974 and 1983. In SchildrothA. N., & KarchmerM. A. (Eds.), Deaf children in America (pp. 161–206). Boston, MA: College-Hill Press.
2.
AndersonD., & ReillyJ. (2002). The MacArthur communicative development inventory: Normative data for American Sign Language. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 7(2), 83–106.
3.
AugustD., McCardleP., & ShanahanT. (2014). Developing literacy in English language learners: Findings from a review of the experimental research. School Psychology Review, 43(4), 490–498.
4.
BattisonR. (1978). Lexical borrowing in American Sign Language.Silver Spring, MD: Linstok.
5.
BaumanH. D. L. (2004). Audism: Exploring the metaphysics of oppression. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 9(2), 239–246.
6.
BaumanH. D. L., & MurrayJ. J. (Eds.). (2014a). Deaf gain: Raising the stakes for human diversity.Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
BayntonD. C. (1996). Forbidden signs: American culture and the campaign against sign language.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9.
BellugiU. (1980). Signed and spoken language—Biological constraints on linguistic form: Report of the Dahlem workshop on sign language and spoken language—Biological constraints on linguistic form.Weinhelm, DK: VCH.
10.
BrooksR., & MeltzoffA. N. (2005). The development of gaze following and its relation to language. Developmental Science, 8(6), 535–543.
11.
ChamberlainC., & MayberryR. I. (2008). American Sign Language syntactic and narrative comprehension in skilled and less skilled readers: Bilingual and bimodal evidence for the linguistic basis of reading. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29(03), 367–388.
12.
CormierK., SchembriA., VinsonD., & OrfanidouE. (2012). First language acquisition differs from second language acquisition in prelingually deaf signers: Evidence from sensitivity to grammaticality judgement in British Sign Language. Cognition, 124(1), 50–65.
13.
CumminsJ. (1979). Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of bilingual children. Review of Educational Research, 49(2), 222–251.
14.
CumminsJ. (2008). BICS and CALP: Empirical and theoretical status of the distinction. In HornbergerN. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and education (pp. 487–499). Berlin, Heidelberg, DK: Springer.
15.
DavidsonK., Lillo-MartinD., & PichlerD. C. (2014). Spoken English language development in native signing children with cochlear implants. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 19(2), 238–250.
16.
DelkL., & WeidekampL. (2001). Shared reading project: Evaluating implementation processes and family outcomes.Washington, DC: Gallaudet University, Clerc Center.
17.
DysonA. H. (1993). Social worlds of children: Learning to write in an urban primary school.New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
18.
EmmoreyK., LukG., PyersJ. E., & BialystokE. (2008). The source of enhanced cognitive control in bilinguals: Evidence from bimodal bilinguals. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1201–1206.
19.
ErtingC. J. (1992). Deafness & literacy: Why can't Sam read?Sign Language Studies, 75(1), 97–112.
20.
Ferjan RamirezN., LeonardM. K., TorresC., HatrakM., HalgrenE., & MayberryR. I. (2014). Neural language processing in adolescent first-language learners. Cerebral Cortex, 24(10), 2772–2783.
21.
GarcíaO. (2009). Education, multilingualism and translanguaging in the 21st century. In MohantyA., PandaM., PhillipsonR., & Skutnabb-KangasT. (Eds.), Multilingual education for social justice: Globalising the local (pp. 128–145). New Delhi, IN: Orient Blackswan.
22.
GrosjeanF. (2001). The right of the deaf child to grow up bilingual. Sign Language Studies, 1(2), 110–114.
23.
GulatiS. (2003). Psychiatric care of culturally deaf people. In GlickmanN. S., & GulatiS. (Eds.), Mental health care of deaf people: A culturally affirmative approach (pp. 33–107). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
24.
HakutaK., ButlerG.Y., & WittD. (2000). How long does it take learners to attain English proficiency?Oakland, CA: University of California Linguistic Minority Research Institute.
25.
Haptonstall-NykazaT. S., & SchickB. (2007). The transition from fingerspelling to English print: Facilitating English decoding. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 12(2), 172–183.
26.
HassanzadehS. (2012). Outcomes of cochlear implantation in deaf children of deaf parents: Comparative study. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 126(10), 989–994.
27.
HermansD., KnoorsH., & VerhoevenL. (2009). Assessment of sign language development: The case of deaf children in the Netherlands. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 15(2), 107–119.
28.
HoffmeisterR. (2000). A piece of the puzzle: ASL and reading comprehension in deaf children. In ChamberlainC., MorfordJ. P., & MayberryR. I. (Eds.), Language acquisition by eye, (pp. 143–163). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
29.
HoffmeisterR. J., & Caldwell-HarrisC. L. (2014). Acquiring English as a second language via print: The task for deaf children. Cognition, 132(2), 229–242.
30.
HumphriesT. (2004). The modern Deaf self: Indigenous practices and educational imperatives. In BrueggemannB. (Ed.), Literacy and deaf people: Cultural and contextual perspectives (pp. 29–46). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
31.
HumphriesT., KushalnagarR., MathurG., NapoliD. J., PaddenC., RathmannC., & SmithS. (2013). The right to language. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 41(4), 872–884.
32.
HumphriesT., KushalnagarR., MadiurG., NapoliD. J., PaddenC., RathmannC., & SmithS. (2015). Language choices for Deaf infants: Advice for parents regarding sign languages. Clinical Pediatrics, Retrieved from http://cpj.sagepub.com/content/early/2015/11/18/0009922815616891.long
33.
HumphriesT., & MacDougallF. (1999). “Chaining” and other links: Making connections between American Sign Language and English in two types of school settings. Visual Anthropology Review, 15(2), 84–94.
34.
HumphriesT., PaddenC., & O'RourkeT. J. (1980). A basic course in American Sign Language.Silver Spring, MD: T. J. Publishers.
35.
JasinskaK. K., & PetittoL. A. (2013). How age of bilingual exposure can change the neural systems for language in the developing brain: A functional near infrared spectroscopy investigation of syntactic processing in monolingual and bilingual children. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 87–101.
36.
JasińskaK. K., & PetittoL. A. (2014). Development of neural systems for reading in the monolingual and bilingual brain: New insights from functional near infrared spectroscopy neuroimaging. Developmental Neuropsychology, 39(6), 421–439.
37.
KlesmerH. (1994). Assessment and teacher perceptions of ESL student achievement. English Quarterly, 26(3), 8–11.
38.
KlimaE., & BellugiU. (1979). The signs of language.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39.
KovelmanI., BakerS. A., & PetittoL. A. (2008). Bilingual and monolingual brains compared: A functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of syntactic processing and a possible “neural signature” of bilingualism. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(1), 153–169.
40.
LaneH. L. (1992). The mask of benevolence: Disabling the deaf community.New York, NY: Knopf.
41.
LaneH. L., HoffmeisterR., & BahanB. J. (1996). A journey into the deaf-world.San Diego, CA: Dawn Sign Press.
42.
LeonardM. K., RamirezN. F., TorresC., TravisK. E., HatrakM., MayberryR. I., & HalgrenE. (2012). Signed words in the congenitally deaf evoke typical late lexicosemantic responses with no early visual responses in left superior temporal cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32(28), 9700–9705.
43.
LiebermanA. M., HatrakM., & MayberryR. I. (2014). Learning to look for language: Development of joint attention in young deaf children. Language Learning and Development, 10(1), 19–35.
44.
MarscharkM., RhotenC., & FabichM. (2007). Effects of cochlear implants on children's reading and academic achievement. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 12(3), 269–282.
45.
MayberryR. I. (1993). First-language acquisition after childhood differs from second-language acquisition: The case of American Sign Language. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 36(6), 1258–1270.
46.
MayberryR. I., ChenJ. K., WitcherP., & KleinD. (2011). Age of acquisition effects on the functional organization of language in the adult brain. Brain and Language, 119(1), 16–29.
47.
MayberryR. I., del GiudiceA. A., & LiebermanA. M. (2011). Reading achievement in relation to phonological coding and awareness in deaf readers: A meta-analysis. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 16(2), 164–188.
48.
MayberryR. I., & EichenE. B. (1991). The long-lasting advantage of learning sign language in childhood: Another look at the critical period for language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(4), 486–512.
49.
MayberryR. I., LockE., & KazmiH. (2002). Development: Linguistic ability and early language exposure. Nature, 417(6884), 38–38.
50.
MayberryR. I., & SquiresB. (2006). Sign language: Acquisition. In LievenE. (Ed.), Language acquisition, Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, (2nd ed., pp. 291–296). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
51.
MeierR. P., & CormierK. (2002). Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
52.
MeierR. P., & NewportE. L. (1990). Out of the hands of babes: On a possible sign advantage in language acquisition. Language, 66(1), 1–23.
53.
MitchellR. E., & KarchmerM. A. (2004). Chasing the mythical ten percent: Parental hearing status of deaf and hard of hearing students in the United States. Sign Language Studies, 4(2), 138–163.
54.
MollL. C., AmantiC., NeffD., & GonzalezN. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132–141.
55.
NapoliD. J., MellonN. K., NiparkoJ. K., RathmannC., MathurG., HumphriesT., … LantosJ. D. (2015). Should all deaf children learn sign language?Pediatrics, 136(1), 170–176.
NewportE. L. (1990). Maturational constraints on language learning. Cognitive Science, 14(1), 11–28.
58.
NewportE. L., & MeierR. P. (1985). The acquisition of American Sign Language.Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
59.
NoverS. M. (1995). Full inclusion for deaf students: An ethnographic perspective. Conference proceedings: Defining quality education for deaf and hard of hearing students (pp. 42–43). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
60.
PaddenC. (1986). Verbs and role-shifting in ASL. In PaddenC. (Ed.), Proceedings of the fourth national symposium on sign language research and teaching (pp. 44–57). Silver Spring, MD: National Association of the Deaf.
61.
PaddenC. (1988). Interaction of morphology and syntax in ASL. Garland outstanding dissertations in linguistics. Series IV.New York, NY: Garland.
62.
PaddenC. (1993). Lessons to be learned from the young deaf orthographer. Linguistics and Education, 5(1), 71–86.
63.
PaddenC., & HumphriesT. (1988). Deaf in America: Voices from a culture.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
PaddenC., & RamseyC. (2000). American Sign Language and reading ability in deaf children. In ChamberlainC., MorfordJ. P., & MayberryR. I. (Eds.), Language acquisition by eye (pp. 65–89). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
66.
PetittoL. A. (2009). New discoveries from the bilingual brain and mind across the life span: Implications for education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 3(4), 185–197.
67.
PetittoL. A., BerensM. S., KovelmanI., DubinsM. H., JasinskaK., & ShalinskyM. (2012). The “Perceptual Wedge Hypothesis” as the basis for bilingual babies’ phonetic processing advantage: New insights from fNIRS brain imaging. Brain and Language, 121(2), 130–143.
68.
PetittoL. A., ZatorreR. J., GaunaK., NikelskiE. J., DostieD., & EvansA. C. (2000). Speech-like cerebral activity in profoundly deaf people processing signed languages: Implications for the neural basis of human language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(25), 13961–13966.
69.
Plaza-PustC., & Morales-LopezE. (Eds.). (2008). Sign bilingualism: Language development, interaction, and maintenance in sign language contact situations (Vol. 38). Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins.
70.
PrinzP. M., & StrongM. (1998). ASL proficiency and English literacy within a bilingual Deaf education model of instruction. Topics in Language Disorders, 18(4), 47–60.
71.
QiS., & MitchellR. E. (2011). Large-scale academic achievement testing of deaf and hard-of-hearing students: Past, present, and future. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 17(1), 1–18.
72.
RathmannC., MannW., & MorganG. (2007). Narrative structure and narrative development in deaf children. Deafness & Education International, 9(4), 187–196.
73.
ReaganT. G. (2004). Non-western educational traditions: Alternative approaches to educational thought and practice.London, UK: Routledge.
74.
ReaganT. G. (2011). Ideological barriers to American Sign Language: Unpacking linguistic resistance. Sign Language Studies, 11(4), 606–636.
75.
RydbergE., GellerstedtL. C., & DanermarkB. (2009). Toward an equal level of educational attainment between deaf and hearing people in Sweden?Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 14(3), 312–323.
76.
SandlerW., MeirI., PaddenC., & AronoffM. (2005). The emergence of grammar: Systematic structure in a new language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(7), 2661–2665.
77.
SchickB. (1990). The effects of morphosyntactic structure on the acquisition of classifier predicates in ASL. In LucasC. (Ed.), Sign language research: Theoretical issues (pp. 358–374). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
78.
SchickB., De VilliersP., De VilliersJ., & HoffmeisterR. (2007). Language and theory of mind: A study of deaf children. Child Development, 78(2), 376–396.
79.
SenghasA., KitaS., & özyürekA. (2004). Children creating core properties of language: Evidence from an emerging sign language in Nicaragua. Science, 305(5691), 1779–1782.
80.
ShantieC., & HoffmeisterR. J. (2000). Why schools for deaf children should hire deaf teachers: A preschool issue. Journal of Education, 182(3), 37–47.
81.
SiegelL. M. (2008). The human right to language: Communication access for deaf children.Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
82.
SimmsL., & ThumannH. (2007). In search of a new, linguistically and culturally sensitive paradigm in deaf education. American Annals of the Deaf, 152(3), 302–311.
83.
SingletonJ. L., & CrumeP. K. (2010). Socializing visual engagement in early childhood deaf education. Poster session presented at the 21st International Congress on the Education of the Deaf, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
84.
SlobinD. I., HoitingN., KuntzeM., LindertR., WeinbergA., PyersJ., … ThumannH. (2003). A cognitive/functional perspective on the acquisition of “classifiers.” In EmmoreyK. (Ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages (pp. 271–296). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
85.
SmithA. K., AndrewsJ. F., AusbrooksM., GentryM. A., & JacobowitzE. L. (2013). A Metalinguistic Awareness Test for ASL/English Bilingual Deaf Children: The TASLA-R. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(5), 885–899.
86.
SnowC. E., & Hoefnagel-HöhleM. (1978). The critical period for language acquisition: Evidence from second language learning. Child Development, 49(4), 1114–1128.
87.
SpencerP. E., SwisherM.V., & WaxmanR. P. (2004). Visual attention. In Meadow-OrlansK., SpencerP. E., & KoesterL. S. (Eds.), The world of deaf infants: A longitudinal study (pp. 168–186). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
88.
StokoeW. C. (1960). Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication systems of the American deaf. Studies in Linguistics: Occasional Papers, 8.
89.
StokoeW. C., CasterlineD. C., & CronebergC. G. (1965). A dictionary of American Sign Language on linguistic principles.Washington, DC: Gallaudet College Press.
90.
StoneA., KartheiserG., HauserP. C., PetittoL., & AllenT. E. (2015). Fingerspelling as a novel gateway into reading fluency in deaf bilinguals. PLoS ONE10(10): e0139610. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0139610
91.
SupallaT. (1986). The classifier system in American Sign Language. In CraigC. G. (Ed.), Noun classes and categorization (pp. 181–214). Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins.
92.
SwisherM. V. (1992). The role of parents in developing visual turn-taking in their young deaf children. American Annals of the Deaf, 137(2), 92–100.
93.
ThomasW., & CollierV. (2002). A national study of school effectiveness for language minority students’ long-term academic achievement. Center for Research on Education, Diversity & Excellence. Retrieved from http://www.usc.edu/dept/education/CMMR/CollierThomasExReport.pdf
94.
TraxlerC. B. (2000). The Stanford Achievement Test: National norming and performance standards for deaf and hard-of-hearing students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5(4), 337–348.
95.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs (2014). Annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d14/tables/dt14_204.30.asp
