This article describes the implementation of small-group reading instruction as secondary- and tertiary-level components of a three-tier model of prevention and intervention. The study consisted of 83 students who were targeted in the winter of kindergarten as being at high risk for reading failure. Intervention consisted of evidence-based curriculum delivered in groups of one to six students during 30- to 40-min sessions a minimum of three times per week over a 2-year period. Outcome data were collected for early literacy skills, using the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills and Woodcock Reading Mastery Test, with comparisons across the different curricula. Results indicated that students in the more directed, explicit intervention groups generally out-performed students in the comparison group. Implications for future research and practice implementing schoolwide three-tier prevention models are discussed.
Abbott, M. (2005). Language arts multi-sensory curriculum (LAMP) Unpublished curriculum.
2.
Abbott, M., Greenwood, C.R., Buzhardt, J., & Tapia, Y. (2006). Using technology-based teacher support tools to scale up the class-wide peer tutoring program. Reading and Writing Quarterly22, 47—64.
3.
Abbott, M., Walton, C., Tapia, Y., & Greenwood, C.R. (1999). Research to practice: A “blueprint” for closing the gap in local schools. Exceptional Children , 83, 339—362.
4.
Abbott, M., Wills, H., Kamps, D., Greenwood, C., Dawson-Bannister, H., Kaufman, J., et al. (in press). The Kansas Reading and Behavior Center's K-3 prevention model In C. R. Greenwood, T. Kratchowill, & M. Clements (Eds.), Elementary school-wide prevention models: Real models and real lessons learned. New York: Guilford.
5.
Adams, G.L., & Englemann, S. (1996). Research on Direct Instruction: 25 years beyond DISTAR. Seattle, WA: Educational Achievement Systems.
6.
Al Otaiba, S., & Fuchs, D. (2002). Characteristics of children who are unresponsive to early literacy intervention. Remedial and Special Education , 23, 300—316.
7.
Al Otaiba, S., & Fuchs, D. (2006). Who are the young children for whom best practices in reading are ineffective?Journal of Learning Disabilities , 39, 414—431.
8.
Allington, R.L. (1991). Children who find learning to read difficult: School responses to diversity. In E. H. Hiebert (Ed.), Literacy for a diverse society: Perspectives and policies (pp. 237—252). New York: Teachers College Press.
9.
Anderson, M., Beard, K., Delgado, B., Kea, C., Raymond, E., Singh, N., et al. (1998). Working with culturally and linguistically diverse children, youth, and their families: Promising practices in assessment, instruction and personnel preparation, A White Paper by the Multicultural Concerns Task Force Council for Children With Behavior Disorders. Reston, VA: CCBD, a Division of the Council for Exceptional Children.
10.
Armbruster, B., Anderson, T.H., & Ostertag, J. (1987). Does text structure/summarization instruction facilitate learning from expository text? Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 331—346.
11.
Baker, J.M., & Zigmond, N. (1990). Are regular education classes equipped to accommodate students with learning disabilities? Exceptional Children , 56, 515—526.
12.
Baker, S.K., Simmons, D.C., & Kame'enui, E.J. (1995). Characteristics of students with diverse learning and curricular needs. Eugene, OR : Center to Improve the Tools of Educators, University of Oregon.
13.
Beck, I.L., McKeown, M.G., & Kucan, L. (2002). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction . New York: Guilford Press.
14.
Chard, D.J., & Kame'enui, E.J. (2000). Struggling first-grade readers: The frequency and progress of their reading. The Journal of Special Education, 34, 28—38.
15.
Coyne, M., Kame'enui, E., Simmons, D., & Harn, B. (2004). Beginning reading intervention as inoculation of insulin: First grade reading performance of strong responders to kindergarten intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 90—104.
16.
Coyne, M.D., Kame'enui, E.J., & Simmons, D.C. (2001). Prevention and intervention in beginning reading: Two complex systems. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 62—73.
17.
Denton, C., Fletcher, J., Anthony, J., & Francis, D. (2006). An evaluation of intensive interventions for students with persistent reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 447—466.
18.
Elbaum, B., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M., Moody, S., & Schumm, J. (2000). How reading outcomes of students with disabilities are related to instructional grouping formats: A meta-analytic review. In R. Gersten, E. Schiller, & S. Vaughn (Eds.), Contemporary special education research (pp. 105—135). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
19.
Fixsen, D.L., Naoom, S.F., Blase, K.A., Friedman, R.M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature . Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network.
20.
Foorman, B., Francis, D., Fletcher, J., Schatschneider, C., & Mehta, P. (1998). The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure in at-risk children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 37—55.
21.
Frances, D., Shaywitz, S., Steubing, K., Shaywitz, B., & Fletcher, J. (1996). Developmental lag versus deficit models of reading disability: A longitudinal, individual growth curves analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 3—17.
22.
Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L.S. (2006). New directions in research, introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it?Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 93—99.
23.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., & Bishop, N. (1992). Teachers planning for students with learning disabilities: Differences between general and special educations. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 7, 120—128.
24.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., & Burrish, P. (2000). Peer-assisted learning strategies: An evidence based practice to promote reading achievement. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 85—91.
25.
Good, R., Kaminski, R., Smith, S., Simmons, D., Kame'enui, E., & Walling, J. (in press). Reviewing outcomes: Using DIBELS to evaluate a school's core curriculum and system of additional interventions in kindergarten. In S. R. Vaughn & K. L. Briggs (Eds.), Reading in the classroom: Systems for observing teaching and learning. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
26.
Good, R., Simmons, D., & Smith, S. (1998). Effective academic interventions in the United States: Evaluating and enhancing the acquisition of early reading skills. School Psychology Review, 27, 45—56.
27.
Good, R.H., Kaminski, R., Shinn, M., Bratten, J., Shinn, M., Laimon, L., et al. (2004). Technical adequacy and decision making utility of DIBELS (Technical Report No. 7). Eugene: University of Oregon.
28.
Greenwood, C.R., Carta, J.J., Hart, B., Kamps, D., Terry, B., Arreaga-Mayer, C., et al. (1992). Out of the laboratory and into the community: Twenty-six years of applied behavior analysis at the Juniper Gardens Children's Project. American Psychologist, 47, 1464—1474.
29.
Greenwood, C.R., Kamps, D., Terry, B., & Linebarger, D. (2007). Primary intervention: A means of preventing special education? In D. Haager, J. Klingner, & S. Vaughn (Eds.), Evidence-based reading practices for response to intervention. New York: Brookes.
30.
Hintze, J., Ryan, A., & Stoner, G. (2003). Concurrent validity and diagnostic accuracy of the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) and the Comprehensive Test Phonological Processing. School Psychology Review, 32, 541—556.
31.
Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437—447.
32.
Kame'enui, E., Good, R., Simmons, D., & Chard, D. (2002). Project CIRCUITS: Toward a primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention system in schools. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the Council for Exceptional Children , New York.
33.
Kame'enui, E.J., Simmons, D.C., Baker, S., Chard, D.J., Dickson, S.V., Gunn, B., et al. (1997). Effective strategies for teaching beginning reading. In E. J. Kame'enui & D. W. Carnine (Eds.), Effective teaching strategies that accommodate diverse learners. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
34.
Kaminski, R., & Good, R.H. III (1996). Toward a technology for assessing basic early literacy skills. School Psychology Review, 25, 215—227.
35.
Kaminski, R., & Good, R.H. III (1998). Assessing early literacy skills in a problem-solving model: Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills . In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement. New York: Guilford.
36.
Kamps, D., & Greenwood, C. (2005). Formulating secondary level reading interventions . Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 500—509.
37.
Kamps, D., Wills, H., Greenwood, C., Thorne, S., Lazo, J., Crockett, J., et al. (2003). Curriculum influences on growth in early reading fluency for students with academic and behavioral risks: A descriptive study. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11, 211—224.
38.
Linan-Thompson, S., Vaughn, S., Prater, K., & Cirino, P. (2006). The response to intervention of English language learners at risk for reading problems. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 390—398.
39.
Mathes, P., Denton, C., Fletcher, J., Anthony, J., Francis, D., & Schatschneider, C. (2005). The effects of theoretically different instruction and student characteristics on the skills of struggling readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 148—182.
40.
Mathes, P., & Torgesen, J. (2005). Early interventions in reading. Columbus, OH: SRA/McGraw.
41.
McMaster, K., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., & Compton, D.L. (2005). Responding to non-responders: An experimental field trial of identification and intervention methods. Exceptional Children, 71, 445—463.
42.
Moody, S.W., Vaughn, S., & Schumm, J.S. (1997). Instructional grouping for reading: Teacher's views. Remedial and Special Education, 18, 347—356.
43.
National Early Literacy Panel. (2005). Report on a synthesis of early predictors of reading. Louisville, KY: Author.
44.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction . Rockville, MD: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
45.
O'Connor, R. (2000). Increasing the intensity of intervention in kindergarten and first grade. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice , 15, 43—54.
Simmons, D.C., & Kame'enui, E.J. (1998). What reading research tells us about children with diverse learning needs: The bases and the basics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
48.
Sinatra, R., Stahl-Gemake, J., & Morgan, R. (1986). Using semantic mapping after reading to organize and write original discourse. Journal of Reading, 30, 4—13.
49.
Smith, C., & Strick, L. (1997). Learning disabilities: A-Z. New York: Simon & Schuster.
50.
Snow, C.E. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward a research and development program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
51.
Snow, C. E., Barnes, W. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children . Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
52.
Sprick, M., Howard, L., & Fidanque, A. (1998). Read well. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
53.
Stahl, S.A., & Fairbanks, M.M. (1986) The effects of vocabulary instruction: A model-based meta-analysis. Review of Education Research, 56, 72—110.
54.
Swanson, H., Hoskyn, M., & Lee, C. (1999). Interventions for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. New York: Guilford Press.
55.
Torgesen, J., Alexander, A.W., Wagner, R.K., Rashotte, C.A., Voeller, K.K., & Conway, T. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 33—58.
56.
Torgesen, J.K. (2000). Individual differences in response to early interventions in reading: The lingering problem of treatment resisters. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 55—64.
57.
Torgesen, J.K. (2002). Lessons learned from intervention research in reading: A way to go before we rest. In R. Stanthorp & P. Tomlinson (Eds.), Learning and teaching reading (pp. 89—104). British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph SeriesII, No. 1.
58.
Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L.S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 137—146.
59.
Vaughn, S., & Schumm, S. (1995). Responsible inclusion for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 264—290.
60.
Vellutino, F., Scanlon, D., & Lyon, G. (2000). Differentiating between difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 33, 223—238.
61.
Wolf, M., Miller, L., & Donnelly, K. (2000). Retrieval, automaticity, vocabulary elaboration, orthography (RAVE-O). Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 375—386.
62.
Woodcock, R. (1998). Woodcock reading mastery tests—Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
