The purpose of the two studies reported in this article was to examine technical features of curriculum-based measures for beginning writers. In Study 1, 50 first graders responded to word copying, sentence copying, and story prompts. In Study 2, 50 additional first graders responded to letter, picture-word, picture-theme, and photo prompts. In both studies, 3- to 5-minute prompts were administered in winter and spring and scored using a variety of quantitative procedures. Students were also administered the Test of Written Language—Third Edition , and teacher ratings and scores on a district rubric for writing were collected. Test-retest (Study 1 only) and alternate-form reliability, criterion validity, and winter-to-spring growth were examined for each measure. Sentence-copying, story, picture-word, and photo prompts emerged as promising beginning-writing measures. Findings have implications for monitoring student progress within a seamless and flexible system across ages and skill levels.
Berninger, V.W. (2000). Development of language by hand and its connections with language by ear, mouth, and eye. Topics in Language Disorders , 20, 65-84.
2.
Berninger, V.W., Abbott, R.D., Abbott, S.P., Graham, S., & Richards, T. (2002). Writing and reading: Connections between language by hand and language by eye. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 35, 39-56.
3.
Berninger, V.W., Nielsen, K.H., Abbott, R.D., Wijsman, E., & Raskind, W. (2008). Writing problems in developmental dyslexia: Under-recognized and under-treated. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 1-21.
4.
Berninger, V.W., Rutberg, J.E., Abbott, R.D., Garcia, N., Anderson-Youngstrom, M., Brooks, A., et al. (2006). Tier 1 and Tier 2 early intervention for handwriting and composing. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 3-30.
5.
Berninger, V.W., Vaughan, K., Abbott, R.D., Begay, K., Coleman, K.B., Curtain, G., et al. (2002). Teaching spelling and composition alone and together: Implications for the simple view of writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 291-304.
6.
Berninger, V., Yates, C., Cartwright, A., Rutberg, J., Remy, E., & Abbott, R. (1992). Lower-level developmental skills in beginning writing. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal , 4, 257-280.
7.
Brigance, A.H. (1999). Comprehensive inventory of basic skills-Revised . North Billerica, MA: Curriculum Associates. Cooper, D., & Pikulski , J. (2005). Here we go!Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
8.
Deno, S.L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative . Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232.
9.
Deno, S., Marston, D., Mirkin, P., Lowry, L., Sindelar, P., & Jenkins, J. (1982). The use of standard tasks to measure achievement in reading, spelling, and written expression: A normative and developmental study (Report No. IRLD-RR-87). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
10.
Deno, S.L., Mirkin, P., & Marston, D. (1980). Relationships among simple measures of written expression and performance on standardized achievement tests (Report No. IRLD-RR-22) . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
11.
Deno, S.L., Mirkin, P., & Marston, D. (1982). Valid measurement procedures for continuous evaluation of written expression. Exceptional Children Special Education and Pediatrics: A New Relationship, 48, 368-371.
12.
Espin, C.A., De La Paz, S., Scierka, B.J., & Roelofs, L. (2005). The relationship between curriculum-based measures in written expression and quality and completeness of expository writing for middle school students. Journal of Special Education, 38, 208-217.
13.
Espin, C.A., Scierka, B.J., Skare, S., & Halverson, N. (1999). Criterion-related validity of curriculum-based measures in writing for secondary school students. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 15, 5-27.
14.
Espin, C., Shin, J., Deno, S.L., Skare, S., Robinson, S., & Benner, B. (2000). Identifying indicators of written expression proficiency for middle school students. Journal of Special Education, 34, 140-153.
15.
Foegen, A., Jiban, C., & Deno, S. (2007). Progress monitoring measures in mathematics: A review of the literature. Journal of Special Education, 41, 121-139.
16.
Gansle, K.A., Noell, G.H., VanDerHeyden, A.M., Naquin, G.M., & Slider, N.J. (2002). Moving beyond total words written: The reliability, criterion validity, and time cost of alternative measures for curriculum-based measurement in writing. School Psychology Review, 31, 477-497.
17.
Gansle, K.A., Noell, G.H., VanDerHeyden, A.M., Slider, N.J., Hoffpauir, L.D., & Whitmarsh, E.L. , et al. (2004). An examination of the criterion validity and sensitivity to brief intervention of alternate curriculum-based measures of writing skill. Psychology in the Schools, 41, 291-300.
18.
Good, R.H., III, & Kaminski, R.A. (1996). Assessment for instructional decisions: Toward a proactive/prevention model of decision-making for early literacy skills. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 326-336.
19.
Graham, S., Berninger, V.W., Abbott, R.D., Abbott, S.P., & Whitaker, D. (1997). Role of mechanics in composing of elementary school students: A new methodological approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 170-182.
20.
Graham, S., Berninger, V., Weintraub, N., & Schafer, W. (1998). Development of handwriting speed and legibility in grades 1-9. Journal of Educational Research, 92, 42-52.
21.
Graham, S., & Harris, K.R. (2005). Improving the writing performance of young struggling writers: Theoretical and programmatic research from the center on accelerating student learning. Journal of Special Education, 39, 19-33.
22.
Graham, S., Harris, K.R., & Chorzempa, B.F. (2002). Contribution of spelling instruction to the spelling, writing, and reading of poor spellers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 669-686.
23.
Graham, S., Harris, K.R., & Fink, B. (2000). Is handwriting causally related to learning to write? Treatment of handwriting problems in beginning writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 620-633.
24.
Graham, S., Harris, K.R., & Larsen, L. (2001). Prevention and intervention of writing difficulties for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: Research & Practice, 16, 74-84.
25.
Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 445-476.
Hammill, D.D., & Larsen, S.C. (1996). Test of written language-Third edition. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
28.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004).
29.
Jewell, J., & Malecki, C.K. (2005). The utility of CBM written language indices: An investigation of production-dependent, production-independent, and accurate-production scores. School Psychology Review, 34, 27-44.
30.
Jones, D., & Christensen, C.A. (1999). Relationship between automaticity in handwriting and students' ability to generate written text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 44-49.
31.
Lembke, E., Deno, S., & Hall, K. (2003). Identifying an indicator of growth in early writing proficiency for elementary school students. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 28, 23-35.
32.
Malecki, C.K., & Jewell, J. (2003). Developmental, gender, and practical considerations in scoring Curriculum-Based Measurement writing probes. Psychology in the Schools, 40, 379-390.
33.
Marston, D. (1989). A curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What it is and why do it. In M. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 18-78). New York: Guilford .
34.
Marston, D., & Deno, S. (1981). The reliability of simple, direct measures of written expression (Report No. IRLD-RR-50). Minneapolis : University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
35.
Marston, D., Deno, S.L., & Tindal, G. (1983). A comparison of standardized achievement tests and direct measurement techniques in measuring pupil progress (Report No. IRLD-RR-126). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
36.
McMaster, K.L., & Campbell, H. (in press). Technical features of new and existing measures of written expression: An examination within and across grade levels. School Psychology Review.
37.
McMaster, K.L., & Espin, C.A. (2007). Technical features of curriculum-based measurement in writing: A literature review. Journal of Special Education , 41, 68-84.
38.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2003). Nation's report card: Writing. Retrieved April 23, 2006, from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/writing/
39.
National Commission on Writing. (2003). The neglected "R": The need for a writing revolution. Retrieved March 16, 2007, from http://www.writingcommission.org/
40.
No Child Left Behind Act, 20 U.S.C. § 6301 et seq. (2002).
41.
Parker, R.I., Tindal, G., & Hasbrouck, J. (1991). Countable indices of writing quality: Their suitability for screening-eligibility decisions. Exceptionality, 2, 1-17.
42.
Reid, K., Hresko, W., & Hammill, D. (2001). The test of early reading ability (3rd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
43.
Ritchey, K.D. (2006). Learning to write: Progress-monitoring tools for beginning and at-risk writers. Teaching Exceptional Children , 39, 22-27.
44.
Salvia, J., & Ysseldyke, J. (2001). Assessment in special and remedial education (8th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
45.
Taylor, R.L. (2003). Assessment of exceptional students: Educational and psychological procedures (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
46.
Tindal, G., Marston, D., & Deno, S.L. (1983). The reliability of direct and repeated measurement (Report No. IRLD-RR-109). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
47.
Tindal, G., & Parker, R. (1991). Identifying measures for evaluating written expression . Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 6, 211-218.
48.
VanDerHeyden, A.M., Witt, J.C., Naquin, G., & Noell, G. (2001). The reliability and validity of curriculum-based measurement readiness probes for kindergarten students. School Psychology Review, 30, 363-382.
49.
Videen, J., Deno, S.L., & Marston, D. (1982). Correct word sequences: A valid indicator of proficiency in written expression (Report No. IRLD-RR-84). Minneapolis : University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
50.
Wagner, R.K., Torgesen, J.K., & Rashotte, C. (1999). Comprehensive test of phonological processing . Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
51.
Wallace, T., Espin, C.A., McMaster, K., Deno, S.L., & Foegen, A. (2007). CBM progress monitoring within a standards-based system: Introduction to the special series. Journal of Special Education, 41, 66-67.
52.
Wayman, M.M., Wallace, T., Wiley, H.I., Ticha, R., & Espin, C.A. (2007). Literature synthesis on curriculum-based measurement in reading. Journal of Special Education, 41, 85-120.
53.
Woodcock, R. (1998). Woodcock reading mastery test-revised/ normative update. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
