Adult literacy interventions often rely on models of reading validated with children or adult populations with a broad range of reading abilities. Such models do not fully satisfy the need for intervention research and development for adults with low literacy. Thus, the authors hypothesized that a model representing the relationship between reading component skills would be predictive of reading comprehension for an adult population with low literacy and beneficial to adult literacy researchers. Using data from 174 adults participating in adult basic education and secondary education programs, the authors performed a path analysis of component skills’ contribution to reading comprehension. The findings are clear that existing reading models do not describe this population. The implications are discussed in terms of instructional and curricular interventions.
Adolf, S., Catts, H., & Little, T. ( 2006). Should the simple view of reading include a fluency component ? Reading and Writing, 19, 933-958.
2.
Bell, L., & Perfetti, C. ( 1994). Reading skill: Some adult comparisons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 244-255.
3.
Braze, D., Tabor, W., Shankweiler, D., & Mencl, W.E. ( 2007). Speaking up for vocabulary: Reading skill differences in young adults. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 226-243.
4.
Bruck, M. ( 1990). Word-recognition skills of adults with childhood diagnoses of dyslexia. Developmental Psychology, 26, 439-454.
5.
Bruck, M. ( 1992). Persistence of dyslexics’ phonological awareness deficits. Developmental Psychology, 28, 874-886.
6.
Bruck, M. ( 1993). Component spelling skills of college students with childhood diagnoses of dyslexia. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 16, 171-184.
7.
Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. ( 2004). Children’s reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 31-42.
8.
Carr, S., & Thompson, B. ( 1996). The effects of prior knowledge and schema activation strategies on the inferential reading comprehension of children with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 19, 48-61.
9.
Catts, H., Hogan, T., & Adolf, S. ( 2005). Developmental changes in reading and reading disabilities . In H. Catts & A. Kamhi (Eds.), Connections between language and reading disabilities (pp. 25-40). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
Catts, H., Hogan, T., & Fey, M. ( 2003). Subgrouping poor readers on the basis of individual differences in reading-related abilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 36, 151-164.
11.
Cohen, J., Cohen P., West, S.G., & Aiken, L.S. ( 2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
Comings, J. ( 2003). Building an evidence-based adult education system (NCSALL occasional paper). Cambridge, MA: National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy.
13.
Comings, J., & Soricone, L. ( 2007, January). Adult literacy research: Opportunities and challenges (NCSALL occasional paper). Cambridge, MA: National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy. Retrieved January 28, 2007, from http://www.ncsall.net/fileadmin/resources/research/op_opps_challenges.pdf
14.
Comprehensive Adult Student Assessment System. ( 2001). CASAS technical manual. San Diego , CA: Author.
15.
Cromley, J., & Azevedo, R. ( 2007). Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology , 99, 311-325.
16.
Cunningham, A., Stanovich, K., & Wilson, M. ( 1990). Cognitive variation in adult college students differing in reading ability. In T. Carr & B. Levy (Eds.), Reading and its development: Component skills approaches (pp. 129-159). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
17.
Curtis, M., & Kruidenier, J. (2005). A summary of scientifically based research principles: Teaching adults to read. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy. Retrieved November 19, 2007, from http://www.nifl.gov/partnershipforreading/publications/teach_adults.pdf
18.
Cutting, L., & Scarborough, H. (2006). Prediction of reading comprehension: Relative contributions of word recognition, language proficiency, and other cognitive skills can depend on how comprehension is measured. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 277-299.
19.
Davidson, R., & Strucker, J. ( 2002). Patterns of word-recognition errors among adult basic education native and nonnative speakers of English. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 299-316.
20.
Dreyer, L.G., & Katz, L. ( 1992). An examination of the "simple view of reading." Yearbook of the National Reading Conference, 41, 169-176.
21.
Durgunoglu, A., & Oney, B. ( 2002). Phonological awareness: It’s not only for children . Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 245-266. Glass, D. ( 2007, January 17). Kansas Adult Education FY06 annual report to the Kansas Board of Regents. Topeka: Kansas Board of Regents.
22.
Gough, P.B., Hoover, W.A., & Peterson, C.L. (1996). Some observations on a simple view of reading. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention (pp. 1-14). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23.
Gough, P., & Tunmer, W. ( 1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6-10.
24.
Greenberg, D., Ehri, L., & Perin, D. ( 1997). Are word reading processes the same or different in adult literacy students and third-fifth graders matched for reading level? Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 262-275.
25.
Greenberg, D., Ehri, L., & Perin, D. ( 2002). Do adult literacy students make the same word-reading and spelling errors as children matched for word-reading age? Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 221-243.
26.
James, L.R., Mulaik, S.A., & Brett, J.M. ( 1982). Causal analysis: Assumptions, models, and data. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
27.
Joshi, R.M., & Aaron, P.G. ( 2000). The component model of reading: Simple view of reading made a little more complex. Reading Psychology, 21, 85-97.
28.
Kruidenier, J. ( 2002). Research-based principles for adult basic education reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.
29.
Kutner, M., Greenberg, E., & Baer, J. ( 2005). National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NAAL): A first look at the literacy of America’s adults in the 21st century (NCES 2006-470) . Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.
30.
Kutner, M., Greenberg, E., Jin, Y., Boyle, B., Hsu, Y., & Dunleavy, E. ( 2007). Literacy in everyday life: Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NCES 2007-480). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
31.
Leslie, L., & Caldwell, J. ( 2001). Qualitative Reading Inventory, 3. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
32.
Lewis, A., & Smith, D. ( 1993). Defining higher order thinking. Theory Into Practice, 32(3), 131-137.
33.
Long, D., Oppy, B., & Seely, M. ( 1994). Individual differences in the time course of inferential processing learning, memory, and cognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 1456-1470.
34.
MacCallum, R., & Austin, J. ( 2000). Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 201-226.
35.
Malicky, G., & Norman, C. ( 1989). The reading concepts and strategies of adult nonreaders . Journal of Reading, 33, 198-202.
36.
Mather, N., Hammill, D., Allen, E., & Roberts, R. ( 2004). Test of Silent Word Reading Fluency. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
37.
Mather, N., & Woodcock, R. ( 2001). Examiner’s manual: Woodcock Johnson-III Test of Cognitive Abilities. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
38.
McKane, P., & Greene, B. ( 1996). The use of theory-based computer-assisted instruction in correctional centers to enhance the reading skills of reading-disadvantaged adults. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 15, 331-344.
39.
McKown, B., & Barnett, C. ( 2007). Improving reading comprehension through higher-order thinking skills. Chicago: Saint Xavier University.
40.
McShane, S. ( 2005). Applying research in reading instruction for adults. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.
41.
Mellard, D., Fall, E. & Mark, C. ( 2008). Reading profiles for adults with low-literacy: Cluster analysis with power and speeded measures. Reading and Writing. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s11145-008-9136-8
42.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction . Retrieved February 18, 2008, from http://www.nationalreadingpanel.org/Publications/researchread.htm
43.
Patterson, M.B. ( 2008). Learning disability prevalence and adult education program characteristics. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice , 23, 50-59.
44.
Rapp, D., van den Broek, P., McMaster, K., Kendeou, P., & Espin, C. ( 2007). Higher-order comprehension processes in struggling readers: A perspective for research and intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 289-312.
45.
Sabatini, J. ( 2002). Efficiency in word reading of adults: Ability group comparisons . Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 267-298.
46.
Sabatini, J., Scarborough, H., Shore, J., Bruce, K., & Sawacki, Y. ( 2007, April). Profile and intervention results for adult literacy learners with low decoding and fluency abilities. Paper presented at American Educational Research Association Conference, Chicago, IL.
47.
Schumaker, J., Denton, P., & Deshler, D. ( 1984). The paraphrasing strategy. Lawrence : University of Kansas, Center for Research on Learning .
48.
Schumaker, J., Deshler, D., Nolan, S., & Alley, G. ( 1994). The self-questioning strategy. Lawrence : University of Kansas, Center for Research on Learning .
49.
Semel, E., Wiig, E., & Secord, W. ( 1987). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals (Rev. ed.) . San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
50.
Stage, F., Carter, H., & Nora, A. ( 2004). Path analysis: An introduction and analysis of a decade of research. Journal of Educational Research, 98(1), 5-12.
51.
Swanson, H.L. ( 1999). Instructional components that predict treatment outcomes for students with learning disabilities: Support for a combined strategy and direct instruction model. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 14, 129-140.
52.
Swanson, H.L., & Hoskyn, M. ( 2001). Instructing adolescents with learning disabilities: A component and composite analysis. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 16, 109-119.
53.
Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. ( 2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Needham Heights MA: Allyn & Bacon.
54.
Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. ( 2007). On the divisions of short-term and working memory: An examination of simple and complex span and their relation to higher order abilities. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 1038-1066.
55.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). Profile of general demographic characteristics, Census 2000. Retrieved June 26, 2007, from http://infoplease.com/ipa/A0884102.html
56.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Vocational and Adult Education. (2005). Enrollment and Participation in the State-Administered Adult Education Program 2004-2005 Tables. Retrieved August 14, 2007, from http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ovae/pi/AdultEd/aedatatables.html
57.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Adult and Vocational Education, Division of Adult Education and Literacy. (2001 ). Measures and methods for the National Reporting System for adult education: Implementation guidelines. Washington, DC: Author.
58.
van den Broek, P., Tzeng, Y., Risden, R., Trabasso, T., & Basche, P. ( 2001). Inferential questioning: Effects on comprehension of narrative texts as a function of grade and timing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 521-529.
59.
Vellutino, F., Scanlon, D., & Tanzman, M. ( 1994). Components of reading ability: Issues and problems in operationalizing word identification, phonological coding, and orthographic coding. In R. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues (pp. 279-332). Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes.
60.
Vellutino, F., Tunmer, W., Jaccard, J., & Chen, R. ( 2007). Components of reading ability: Multivariate evidence for a convergent skills model of reading development. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 3-32.
61.
Wagner, R.K., Torgesen, J.T., & Rashotte, C.A. (1999). The Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
62.
Wechsler, D. ( 1997). Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
63.
Wilson Language Training. (2002). Wilson Reading System. Oxford, MA: Author.
64.
Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. ( 1999). The "double-deficit hypothesis" for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 415-438.
65.
Wolf, M., Bowers, P., & Biddle, K. ( 2000). Naming-speed processes, timing and reading: A conceptual review. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 387-407.
66.
Wolf, M., & Katzir-Cohen, T. (2001). Reading fluency and its intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 211-239.
67.
Woodcock, R. ( 1998). Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests-Revised: Examiner’s manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
68.
Workforce Investment Act of 1998, Pub. L. No. 105-220, 112 Stat. 936 (1998).
