The Effects of Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategy Instruction on the Mathematical Problem Solving of Middle School Students with Learning Disabilities
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 1992
The Effects of Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategy Instruction on the Mathematical Problem Solving of Middle School Students with Learning Disabilities
This study investigated the effects of cognitive and metacognitive strategy instruction on the mathematical problem solving of six middle school students with learning disabilities. Conditions of the multiple baseline, across-subjects design included baseline, two levels of treatment, setting and temporal generalization, and retraining. For Treatment 1, subjects received either cognitive or metacognitive strategy instruction. Treatment 2 consisted of instruction in the complementary component of the instructional program so that all subjects eventually received both cognitive and metacognitive strategy instruction. This design allowed a componential analysis of the content as well as sequence of instruction. Generally, subjects improved their mathematical problem solving as measured by performance on one-, two-, and three-step word problems. Discussion focused on effectiveness of treatment, acquisition and application of strategic knowledge, error pattern analysis, and the need to tailor instruction to the learner's individual characteristics.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, J. (1987). Skill acquisition: Compilation of weak-method problem solutions. Psychological Review, 94, 192–210.
2.
Bennett, K. (1982). The effects of syntax and verbal mediation on learning disabled students' verbal mathematical problem solving (Doctoral dissertation, Northern Arizona University, 1981). Dissertation Abstracts International, 42, 422–429.
3.
Berger, R., & Reid, D.K. (1989). Differences that make a difference: Comparisons of metacomponential functioning and knowledge base among groups of high and low IQ learning disabled, mildly mentally retarded, and normally achieving adults. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 422–429.
4.
Bos, C., & Filip, D. (1984). Comprehension monitoring in learning disabled and average students. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 229–233.
5.
Brown, A.L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 1 pp. 77–165). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6.
Case, L., & Harris, K. (1988, April). Self-instructional strategy training: Improving mathematical problem solving skills of learning disabled students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
7.
Englert, C., Raphael, T., Fear, K., & Anderson, L. (1988). Students' metacognitive knowledge about how to write informational text. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11, 18–46.
8.
Graham, S., & Harris, K. (1989). Components analysis of cognitive strategy instruction: Effects on learning disabled students' compositions and self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 353–361.
9.
Graves, A. (1986). Effects of direct instruction and metacomprehension training on finding main ideas. Learning Disabilities Research, 1, 90–100.
10.
Hutchinson, N. (1990, April). Problem representation and algebra problem solving of students with LD. Paper presented at the Council for Exceptional Children International Conference, Toronto, Canada.
11.
Larson, K., & Gerber, M. (in press). Meta-cognition and learning disability. In N. Singh & I. Beale (Eds.), Current perspectives in learning disabilities: Nature, theory, and treatment.New York: Springer-Verlag.
12.
Lester, F. (1985). Methodological considerations in research on mathematical problem-solving instruction. In E.A. Silver (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 41–69). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13.
Mayer, R. (1985). Mathematical ability. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), Human abilities: Information processing approach (pp. 127–150). San Francisco: Freeman.
14.
Montague, M., & Applegate, B. (1991). The effects of cognitive-metacognitive strategy instruction on mathematical problem solving of middle school students. Manuscript submitted for publication.
15.
Montague, M., & Bos, C. (1986). The effect of cognitive strategy training on verbal math problem solving performance of learning disabled adolescents. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 26–33.
16.
Montague, M., & Bos, C. (1990). Cognitive and metacognitive characteristics of eighth-grade students' mathematical problem solving. Learning and Individual Differences, 2, 109–127.
17.
Montague, M., Bos, C., & Doucette, M. (1991). Affective, cognitive, and metacognitive attributes of eighth-grade mathematical problem solvers. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 6, 145–151.
18.
Paris, S., Lipson, M., & Wixon, K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 293–316.
19.
Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
Pressley, M., Symons, S., Snyder, B., & Cariglia-Bull, T. (1989). Strategy instruction research comes of age. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 16–30.
21.
Schoenfeld, A. (1985). Mathematical problem solving.New York: Academic Press.
22.
Shuell, T. (1986). Cognitive conceptions of learning. Review of Educational Research, 56, 411–436.
23.
Shuell, T. (1990). Phases of meaningful learning. Review of Educational Research, 60, 531–548.
24.
Slife, B., Weiss, J., & Bell, T. (1985). Separability of metacognition and cognition: Problem solving in learning disabled and regular students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 437–445.
25.
Smith, E., & Alley, G. (1981). The effect of teaching sixth graders with learning difficulties a strategy for solving verbal math problems (Research Rep. No. 39). Lawrence: The University of Kansas Institute for Research in Learning Disabilities.
26.
Torgesen, J., Kistner, J., & Morgan, S. (1987). Component processes in working memory. In J. Borkowski & J. Day (Eds.), Cognition in special children: Comparative approaches to retardation, learning disabilities, and giftedness (pp. 47–86). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
27.
Uprichard, A., Phillips, E., & Soriano, A. (1984). A conceptual scheme for solving mathematical word problems with implications for instruction. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 6, 79–106.
28.
Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler intelligence scale for children-Revised.San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
29.
Wong, B. (1985). Metacognition and learning disabilities. In T.G. Waller, D. Forrest-Pressley, & E. MacKinnon (Eds.), Metacognition, cognition, and human performance (pp. 137–180). New York: Academic Press.
30.
Woodcock, W., & Johnson, M. (1989). Woodcock-Johnson psycho-educational battery.Boston: Teaching Resources.
31.
Zawaiza, T. (1991, April). The effects of explicit instructions on mathematical word problem solving of postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
