The predictors of student and teacher variables on the access to the general education curriculum of 19 students with intellectual and developmental disabilities were examined based on the observation data collected for a total of 1,140 minutes. Multilevel regression analyses were employed to analyze the data. The findings indicated that both student and teacher variables are strong predictors of access to the general education curriculum. A complicated pattern of the relationship between student and teacher variables (e.g., suppression, correction of distortion) was found along with interaction between these variables and environmental factors. These findings also suggest future practices and research that can be considered to enhance access to the general education curriculum for students with disabilities.
Agran, M., Blanchard, C., Hughes, C., & Wehmeyer, M. (2002). Increasing the problem-solving skills of students with developmental disabilities participating in general education. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 279-288.
2.
Bashinski, S.M., & Wehmeyer, M.L. (2002). Access CISSAR (Version 1.0) [Computer software]. Lawrence: University of Kansas.
3.
Brophy, J., & Good, T. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 340-370). New York: Macmillan.
4.
Browder, D., & Spooner, F. (2006). Teaching language arts, math, and science to students with significant cognitive disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
5.
Browder, D.M., Wakeman, S.Y., Flowers, C., Rickelman, R., Pugalee, D., & Karvonen, M. (2007). Creating access to the general curriculum with links to grade-level content for students with significant cognitive disabilities: An explication of the concept. The Journal of Special Education , 41, 2-16.
6.
Brown, W.H., Odom, S.L., Li, S., & Zercher, C. (1999). Ecobehavioral assessment in early childhood programs: A portrait of preschool inclusion. The Journal of Special Education, 33, 138-153.
7.
Browne, W.J., & Rasbash, J. (2004). Multilevel modelling. In M. A. Hardy & A. Bryman (Eds.), Handbook of data analysis (pp. 459-480). London: Sage.
8.
Carta, J.J., Greenwood, R., Schulte, D., Arreaga-Mayer, C., & Terry, B. (1988). Code for instructional structure and student academic response: Mainstream version (MS-CISSAR). Kansas City: Juniper Gardens Children's Project, Bureau of Child Research, University of Kansas.
9.
Carter, E.W., Cushing, L.S., Clark, N.M., & Kennedy, C.H. (2005). Effects of peer support interventions on students' access to the general curriculum and social interactions. Research & Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 30, 15-25.
10.
Carvajal, S.C., Baumler, E., Harrist, R.B., & Parcel, G.S. (2001). Multilevel models and unbiased tests for group based interventions: Examples from the Safer Choices Study. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 185-205.
11.
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1975). Applied multiple regression/ correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: John Wiley.
12.
Conger, A.J. (1974). A revised definition for suppressor variables: A guide to their identification and interpretation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 35-46.
13.
Darmawan, I.G.N., & Keeves, J.P. (2006). Suppressor variables and multilevel mixture modeling . International Education Journal, 7, 160-173.
14.
Duvall, S.F., Delquadri, J.C., & Ward, D.L. (2004). A preliminary investigation of the effectiveness of homeschool instructional environments for students with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. School Psychology Review, 33, 140-158.
15.
Dymond, S.K., & Russell, D.L. (2004). Impact of grade and disability on the instructional context of inclusive classrooms. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 39, 127-140.
16.
Embregts, P.J. (2003). Using self-management, video feedback, and graphic feedback to improve social behavior of youth with mild mental retardation . Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 283-295.
17.
Fisher, D., & Nancy, F. (2001). Access to the core curriculum: Critical ingredients for student success. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 148-157.
18.
Friedman, D.L., Cancelli, A.A., & Yoshida, R.K. (1988). Academic engagement of elementary school children with learning disabilities. Journal of Psychology, 26, 327-340.
19.
Giangreco, M.F., Broer, S.M., & Edelman, S.W. (2001). Teacher engagement with students with disabilities: Differences based on paraprofessional service delivery models. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 26, 75-86.
20.
Greenwood, C.R. (1991). Longitudinal analysis of time, engagement, and achievement in at-risk versus nonrisk students. Exceptional Children, 57, 521-535.
21.
Greenwood, C.R., Arreaga-Mayer, C., & Carta, J.J. (1994). Identification and translation of effective, teacher-developed instructional procedures for general practice. Remedial and Special Education, 15, 140-151.
22.
Greenwood, C.R., Carta, J.J., Arreaga-Mayer, C., & Rager, A. (1991). The behavior analyst consulting model: Identifying and validating naturally effective instructional procedures. Journal of Behavioral Education, 1, 165-191.
23.
Greenwood, C.R., Carta, J.J., Kamps, D., Delquadri, J., Terry, B., Finney, R., et al. (1997). Ecobehavioral Assessment Systems Software (EBASS). Practitioner's manual (Version 3.0) [Computer software]. Kansas City: Juniper Gardens Children's Project, University of Kansas.
24.
Greenwood, C.R., Carta, J.J., Kamps, D., Terry, B., & Delquadri, J. (1994). Development and validation of standard classroom observation systems for school practitioners: Ecobehavioral Assessment Systems Software (EBASS). Exceptional Children, 61, 197-210.
Greenwood, C., Schulte, D., Kohler, F., Dinwiddie, G., & Carta, J. (1986). Assessment and analysis of ecobehavioral interaction in school settings. In R. J. Prinz (Ed.), Advances in behavioral assessment of children and families (pp. 69-98). Lincoln, NE: JAI.
27.
Guo, G., & Zhao, H. (2000). Multilevel modeling for binary data. Annual Reviews Sociology, 26, 441-462.
28.
Horst, P. (1941). The role of predictor variables which are independent of the criterion. Social Science Research Bulletin, 48, 431-436.
29.
Hunt, P., Staub, D., Alwell, M., & Goetz, L. (1994). Achievement by all students within the context of cooperative learning groups. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 19, 290-301.
30.
Janney, R., & Snell, M. (2000). Teachers' guides to inclusive practices: Modifying schoolwork. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes .
31.
Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, F.P. (2000). Joining together: Group theory and group skills (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
32.
Kame'enui, E.J., & Simmons, D.C. (1999). Toward successful inclusion of students with disabilities: The architecture of instruction. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
33.
Kamps, D., Greenwood, C.R., & Leonard, B. (1991). Ecobehavioral assessment in classrooms serving children with autism and developmental disabilities. In R. Prinz (Ed.), Advances in behavior assessment of children and families (pp. 203-239). New York: Kingsley.
34.
Kamps, D.M., Leonard, B.R., Dugan, E.P., Boland, B., & Greenwood, C.R. (1991). The use of ecobehavioral assessment to identify naturally occurring effective procedures in classrooms serving children with autism and other developmental disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 1, 367-397.
35.
Katz, J., Mirenda, P., & Auerbach, S. (2002). Instructional strategies and educational outcomes for students with developmental disabilities in inclusive "multiple intelligences" and typical inclusive classrooms. Research & Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 27, 227-238.
36.
Kenny, D.A., & Judd, C.M. (1986). Consequences of violating the independence assumption in the analysis of variance. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 422, 431.
37.
Kossar, K., Mitchem, K., & Ludlow, B. (2005). No Child Left Behind: A national study of its impact on special education in rural schools. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 24, 3-8.
38.
Krus, D.J., & Wilkinson, S.M. (1986). Demonstration of properties of a suppressor variable. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 18, 21-24.
39.
Logan, K., Bakeman, R., & Keefe, E. (1997). Effects of instructional variables on engaged behavior of students with disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptional Children, 64, 481-497.
40.
Logan, K., & Keefe, E. (1997). A comparison of instructional context, teacher behavior, and engaged behavior for students with severe disabilities in general education and self-contained elementary classrooms. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 22, 16-27.
41.
Maccini, P., & Gagnon, J.C. (2006). Mathematics instructional practices and assessment accommodations by secondary special and general educators. Exceptional Children, 72, 217-234.
42.
Martin, J.E., Mithaug, D.E., Peterson, L.Y., VanDycke, J.L., & Cash, M.E. (2003). Increasing self-determination: Teaching students to plan, work, evaluate, and adjust. Exceptional Children , 69, 431-447.
43.
Mayer, M., Lochman, J., & Acker, R.V. (2005). Introduction to the special issue: Cognitive-behavioral interventions with students with EBD. Behavioral Disorders , 30, 197-212.
44.
McDonnell, J., Mathot-Buckner, C., Thorson, N., & Fister, S. (2001). Supporting the inclusion of students with moderate and severe disabilities in junior high school general education classes: The effects of classwide peer tutoring, multi-element curriculum, and accommodations . Education and Treatment of Children, 24, 141-160.
45.
McDonnell, J., Thorson, N., & McQuivey, C. (1998). The instructional characteristics of inclusive classes for elementary students with severe disabilities: An exploratory study . Journal of Behavioral Education, 8, 415-437.
46.
McDonnell, J., Thorson, N., & McQuivey, C. (2000). Comparison of the instructional contexts of students with severe disabilities and their peers in general education classes. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 25, 54-58.
47.
Nolet, V., & McLaughlin, M.J. (2000). Accessing the general curriculum: Including students with disabilities in standards-based reform. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
48.
Olson, M.R., Chalmers, L., & Hoover, J.H. (1997). Attitudes and attributes of general education teachers identified as effective inclusionists. Remedial and Special Education, 18, 28-35.
49.
Paulsen, K.J. (2005). Infusing evidence-based practices into the special education preparation curriculum. Teacher Education and Special Education, 28, 21-28.
50.
Rabe-Hesketh, S., Toulopoulou, T., & Murray, R.M. (2001). Multilevel modeling of cognitive function in schizophrenic patients and their first degree relatives. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 179-198.
51.
Rankin, D.H., Logan, K.R., Adcock, J., Angelucci, J., Pittman, C., Sexstone, A., et al. (1999). Small group learning: Effects of
52.
including a student with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 11, 159-177.
53.
Rasbash, J. (2007). What are multilevel models and why should I use them? Centre for Multilevel Modelling. Retrieved July 14, 2007 , from http://www.cmm.bristol.ac.uk/learning-training/multilevel-models/what-why.shtml
54.
Roberson, L., Woolsey, M.L., Seabrooks, J., & Williams, G. (2004a). An ecobehavioral assessment of the teaching behaviors of teacher candidates during their special education internship experiences . Teacher Education and Special Education, 27, 264-275.
55.
Roberson, L., Woolsey, M.L., Seabrooks, J., & Williams, G. (2004b). Data-driven assessment of teacher candidates during their internships in deaf education. American Annals of the Deaf, 148, 403-412.
56.
Rose, D.H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Curriculum Development and Supervision.
57.
Rose, D.H., Meyer, A., & Hitchcock, C. (2005). The universally designed classroom: Accessible curriculum and digital technologies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Publishing Group.
58.
Rosenberg, M. (1968). The logic of survey analysis. New York: Basic Books.
59.
Ross, D.E., Singer-Dudek, J., & Greer, R.D. (2005). The Teacher Performance Rate and Accuracy Scale (TPRA): Training as evaluation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 40, 411-423.
60.
Salend, S.J. (2000). Strategies and resources to evaluate the impact of inclusion programs on students. Intervention, 35, 264-270, 289.
61.
Shogren, K., Faggella-Luby, M., Bae, S.J., & Wehmeyer, M.L. (2004). The effect of choice-making as an intervention for problem behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6, 228-237.
62.
Singer, J.D. (1998). Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel modes, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24, 323-355.
63.
Singer, J.D., & Willett, J.B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press.
64.
Smith, R.L., Ager, J.W., & Williams, D.L. (1992). Suppressor variables in multiple regression/correlation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 17-29.
65.
Soukup, J.H., Wehmeyer, M.L., Bashinski, S.M., & Bovaird, J. (2007). Classroom variables and access to the general education curriculum of students with intellectual and developmental disabilities . Exceptional Children, 74, 101-120.
66.
Thompson, J., Bryant, B., Campbell, E., Craig, E., Hughes, C., Rotholz, D., et al. (2004). Supports Intensity Scale. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation .
67.
Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., Kouzekanani, K., Bryant, D.P., Dickson, H., & Blozis, S.A. (2003). Reading instruction grouping for students with reading difficulties. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 301-315.
68.
Vyse, S.A., & Mulick, J.A. (1988). Ecobehavioral assessment of a special education classroom: Teacher-student behavioral covariation. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 1, 201-206.
69.
Wallace, T., Anderson, A.R., Bartholomay, T., & Hupp, S. (2002). An ecobehavioral examination of high school classrooms that include students with disabilities. Exceptional Children , 68, 345-359.
70.
Wehmeyer, M.L., Lance, D., & Bashinski, S. (2002). Promoting access to the general curriculum for students with mental retardation: A multi-level model. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37, 223-234.
71.
Wehmeyer, M.L., Lattin, D., Lapp-Rincker, G., & Agran, M. (2003). Access to the general curriculum of middle-school students with mental retardation: An observational study. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 262-272.
72.
Wehmeyer, M.L., Sands, D.J., Knowlton, E., & Kozleski, E.B. (2002). Teaching students with mental retardation: Providing access to the general curriculum. Baltimore: Paul Brookes.
73.
Wehmeyer, M.L., Yeager, D., Bolding, N., Agran, M., & Hughes, C. (2003). The effects of self-regulation strategies on goal attainment for students with developmental disabilities in general education classrooms. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities , 15, 79-91.
74.
Woolsey, M.L., Harrison, T.J., & Gardner, R. (2004). A preliminary examination of instructional arrangements, teaching behaviors, levels of academic responding of deaf middle school students in three different educational settings. Education and Treatment of Children, 27, 263-279.
