This study investigated the effects of the Scott Foresman Early Reading Intervention (ERI) on growth rates in the early literacy skills of urban at-risk kindergarten students. Students participated in one of three groups: treatment-intensive/ strategic, treatment-benchmark, and nontreatment-benchmark. Treatment group students received a 30-minute ERI program from classroom teachers 3 days a week for 5 to 14 weeks. Using multivariate analysis of variance and the hierarchical linear model, the authors compared students' benchmark and progress monitoring scores on the Phoneme Segmentation Fluency (PSF) and Nonsense Word Fluency (NWF) subtests of the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Literacy Skills™. Results indicated that PSF and NWF benchmark performance gaps decreased between the treatment-intensive/ strategic and nontreatment-benchmark groups, indicating beneficial effects for the ERI. Additionally, the PSF and NWF progress monitoring growth rates of treatment group students during the ERI program were significantly higher than rates before treatment. Implications of early reading interventions for urban at-risk students are discussed.
Burns, M.K., & Senesac, B.V. (2005). Comparison of dual discrepancy criteria to assess response to intervention. Journal of School Psychology, 43, 393-406.
2.
Bursuck, W.D., Smith, T., Munk, D., Damer, M., Mehlig, L., & Perry, J. (2004). Evaluating the impact of a prevention-based model of reading on children who are at-risk. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 303-313.
3.
Byrne, B., & Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1989). Phonemic awareness and letter knowledge in the child's acquisition of the alphabetic principle. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 313-321.
4.
Cartledge, G., & Lo, Y. (2006). Teaching urban learners: Culturally responsive strategies for developing academic and behavioral competence. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
5.
Cavanaugh, C.L., Kim, A., Wanzek, J., & Vaughn, S. (2004). Kindergarten reading interventions for at-risk students: Twenty years of research. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 2(1), 9-21.
6.
Compton, D.L. (2000). Modeling the growth of decoding skills in first-grade children. Scientific Studies in Reading, 4, 219-259.
7.
Fuchs, L.S. (2003). Assessing intervention responsiveness: Conceptual and technical issues. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 81, 172-186.
8.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., & Compton, D.L. (2004). Monitoring early reading development in first grade: Word identification fluency versus nonsense word fluency. Exceptional Children, 71, 7-21.
9.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., Thompson, A., Al Otaiba, S., Yen, L., Yang, N.J., et al. (2001). Is reading important in reading-readiness programs? A randomized field trial with teachers as program implementers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 251-267.
10.
Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (Eds). (2002). Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement. Retrieved May 15, 2005, from http://dibels.uoregon.edu
11.
Good, R.H., III, Kaminski, R.A., Simmons, D., & Kame'enui, E.J. (2001). Using Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) in an outcomes-driven model: Steps to reading outcomes. Unpublished manuscript, University of Oregon at Eugene.
12.
Good, R.H., Simmons, D.C., Kame'enui, E., Kaminski, R.A., & Wallin, J. (2002). DIBELS instructional recommendations: Intensive, strategic, and benchmark. In R. H. Good & R. A. Kaminski (Eds.), Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement.
13.
Good, R.H., Simmons, D.C., & Smith, S.B. (1998). Effective academic intervention in the United States: Evaluating and enhancing the acquisition of early reading skills. Educational and Child Psychology, 15(1), 56-70.
14.
Gunn, B., Biglan, A., Smolkowski, K., & Ary, D. (2000). The efficacy of supplemental instruction in decoding skills for Hispanic and Non-Hispanic students in early elementary school. The Journal of Special Education, 34, 90-103.
15.
Gunn, B., Smolkowski, K., Biglan, A., & Black, C. (2002). Supplemental instruction in decoding skills for Hispanic and non-Hispanic students in early elementary school: A follow-up . The Journal of Special Education, 36, 69-79.
16.
Hecht, S.A., & Close, L. (2002). Emergent literacy skills and training time uniquely predict variability in responses to phonemic awareness training in disadvantaged kindergartners. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82, 93-115.
17.
Hindson, B., Byrne, B., Fielding-Barnsley, R., Newman, C., Hine, D.W., & Shankweiler, D. (2005). Assessment and early instruction of preschool children at risk for reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 687-704.
18.
Horner, R.H. (2006, May). Using single case designs to establish evidence-based practice. Tutorial presented at the 32nd annual convention of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Atlanta, GA.
19.
Horner, R.H., Carr, E.G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165-179.
20.
Jenson, W.R., Clark, E., Kircher, J.C., & Kristjansson, S.D. (2007). Statistical reform: Evidence-based practice, meta-analyses, and single subject designs. Psychology in the Schools, 44, 483-493.
21.
Kame'enui, E.J., Simmons, D.C., Good, R.H., & Harn, B.A. (2001). The use of fluency-based measures in early identification and evaluation of intervention efficacy in schools. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain (pp. 307-331). Baltimore: York Press.
22.
Kaminski, R.A., & Good, R.H. (1996). Toward a technology for assessing basic early literacy skills. School Psychology, 25, 215-227.
Lane, K.L., & Menzies, H.M. (2002). The effects of a school-based primary intervention program: Preliminary outcomes. Preventing School Failure, 47, 26-32.
25.
Lane, K.L., & Menzies, H.M. (2003). A school-wide intervention with primary and secondary levels of support for elementary students: Outcomes and considerations. Education and Treatment of Children, 26, 431-451.
26.
Lane, K.L., Menzies, H.M., Munton, S.M., von Duering, R.M., & English, G.L. (2005). The effects of a supplemental early literacy program for a student at risk: A case study. Preventing School Failure , 50, 21-28.
27.
Lane, K.L., Wehby, J.H., Menzies, H.M., Gregg, R.M., Doukas, G.L., & Munton, S.M. (2002). Early literacy instruction for first-grade students at-risk for antisocial behavior. Education and Treatment of Children, 25, 438-458.
28.
Lutkus, A.D., Rampey, B.D., & Donahue, P. (2005). The nation's report card: Trial Urban District Assessment: Reading 2005 (NCES 2006-455). Washington, DC : Government Printing Office, U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
29.
Mahoney, J.L., Lord, H., & Carryl, E. (2005). An ecological analysis of after-school program participation and the development of academic performance and motivational attributes for disadvantaged children. Child Development, 76, 811-825.
30.
Mann, V.A., & Foy, J.G. (2003). Phonological awareness, speech development, and letter knowledge in preschool children. Annals of Dyslexia , 53, 149-173.
31.
McMaster, K.L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., & Compton, D.L. (2005). Responding to nonresponders: An experimental field trial of identification and intervention methods. Exceptional Children, 71, 445-463.
32.
Musti-Rao, S. (2005). The effects of a supplemental early reading intervention with urban kindergarten and first-grade students: A preventative approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University , Columbus.
33.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4754). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
34.
Nichols, W.D., Rupley, W.H., Rickelman, R.J., & Algozzine, B. (2004). Examining phonemic awareness and concepts of print patterns of kindergarten students. Reading Research and Instruction , 43(3), 56-81.
35.
Qi, S., & O'Connor, R. (2000). Comparison of phonological training procedures in kindergarten classrooms. The Journal of Educational Research , 93, 226-234.
36.
Raudenbush, S.W., & Bryk, A.S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
Ritchey, K.D., & Speece, D.L. (2006). From letter names to word reading: The nascent role of sublexical fluency. Contemporary Educational Psychology , 31, 301-327.
38.
Santi, K.L., Menchetti, B.M., & Edwards, B.J. (2004). A comparison of eight kindergarten phonemic awareness programs based on empirically validated instructional principles. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 189-196.
39.
Schacter, J., & Jo, B. (2005). Learning when school is not in session: A reading summer day-camp intervention to improve the achievement of exiting first-grade students who are economically disadvantaged. Journal of Research in Reading, 28, 158-169.
40.
Shadish, W.R., & Rindskopf, D.M. (2007). Methods for evidence-based practice: Quantitative syntheses of single-subject designs. New Directions for Evaluation, 113, 95-109.
41.
Simmons, D. C., & Kame'enui, E. J. (Eds.). (1998). What reading research tells us about children with diverse learning needs: Bases and basics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42.
Simmons, D.C., & Kame'enui, E.J. (2003). Scott Foresman Early Reading Intervention. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
43.
Simmons, D.C., Kame'enui, E.J., Coyne, M.D., & Chard, D.J. (2002). Effective strategies for teaching beginning reading . In E. J. Kame'enui, D. W. Carnine, R. C. Dixon, D. C. Simmons, & M. D. Coyne (Eds.), Effective teaching strategies that accommodate diverse learners (2nd ed., pp. 53-92). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
44.
Speece, D.L. (2005). Hitting the moving target known as reading development: Some thoughts on screening children for secondary interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 487-493.
45.
Speece, D.L., Mills, C., Ritchey, K.D., & Hillman, E. (2003). Initial evidence that letter fluency tasks are valid indicators of early reading skill. The Journal of Special Education, 36, 223-233.
46.
Speece, D.L., Ritchey, K.D., Cooper, D.H., Roth, F.P., & Schatschneider, C. (2004). Growth in early reading skills from kindergarten to third grade. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 312-332.
47.
Spira, E.G., Bracken, S.S., & Fischel, J.E. (2005). Predicting improvement after first-grade reading difficulties: The effects of oral language, emergent literacy, and behavior skills. Developmental Psychology, 41, 225-234.
48.
SRA/McGraw-Hill. (2005). SRA Open Court Reading-Grade K. Columbus, OH: Author.
49.
Tawney, J.W., & Gast, D.L. (1984). Single-subject research in special education. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
50.
Taylor, B.M., Pearson, P.D., & Peterson, D.S. (2005). The CIERA school change framework: An evidence-based approach to professional development and school reading improvement. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 40-69.
51.
Van den Noorgate, W., & Onghena, P. (2003a). Combining single-case experimental data using hierarchical linear models. School Psychology Quarterly, 18, 325-346.
52.
Van den Noorgate, W., & Onghena, P. (2003b). Hierarchical linear models for the quantitative integration of effect sizes in single-case research. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 1-10.
53.
Vellutino, F.R. (1991). Introduction to three studies on reading acquisition: Convergent findings on theoretical foundations of code-oriented versus whole-language approaches to reading instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 437-443.
54.
Yurick, A.L. (2006). The effectiveness of an instructional assistant led supplemental early reading intervention with urban kindergarten students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University , Columbus.
