This review compared eight different inclusive models for elementary students with mild disabilities, primarily with learning disabilities. Model programs were described according to curricular innovations and the way school personnel and classrooms were organized. Quantified academic outcomes were also discussed. Methodological concerns prevented conclusions about the superiority of inclusive programming over pull-out programs. There were indications that inclusive programming can be effective for some, although not all, students with mild disabilities. More conclusive evidence suggests that the impact of organization and instructional changes on the achievement of nondisabled students was positive. Common elements in models reviewed included a redesigning of general education classrooms so that they more closely resembled special education: low student-to-staff ratio, intensive and prescribed basic skills instruction, performance monitoring, and the opportunity for intensive, one-to-one instruction. Results are discussed in light of implications of the inclusion movement and the future of special education.
References
1.
Affleck, J., Madge, S., Adams, A., & Lowenbraun, S., (1988). Integrated classroom versus resource model: Academic viability and effectiveness. Exceptional Children, 54, 339--348.
2.
Baker, J., & Zigmond, N., (1995). The meaning and practice of inclusion for students with learning disabilities: Themes and implications from the five cases. The Journal of Special Education, 29, 163--180.
3.
Bear, G., & Proctor, W., (1990). Impact of a full-time integrated program on the achievement of nonhandicapped and mildly handicapped children. Exceptionality, 1, 227--238.
4.
Beatty, L. S., Madden, R., Gardner, E. G, & Karlsen, B., (1976). Stanford diagnostic mathematics test. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
5.
Bryan, J. H., & Bryan, T. S, (1988). Where's the beef? A review of published research on the adaptive learning environments model. Learning Disabilities Focus, 4, 9--15.
6.
Carlberg, C., & Kavale, K., (1980). The efficacy of special versus regular class placement for exceptional children: A metaanalysis. The Journal of Special Education, 14, 295--309.
7.
CTB/McGraw-Hill. (1977). California achievement tests. Monterey, CA: Author.
Espin, C, Deno, S. L, Maruyama, G., & Cohen, C., (1989, April). The Basic Academic Skills Samples (BASS): An instrument for the screening and identification of children at risk for failure in regular education classrooms. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
13.
Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S, (1988). Response to Wang and Walberg. Exceptional Children, 55, 138--146.
14.
Gardner, E. F., Rudman, H. C, Karlsen, B., & Merwin, J. C, (1982). Stanford achievement test (7th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
15.
Gerber, M. M, (1988). Tolerance and technology of instruction: Implications for special education reform. Exceptional Children, 54, 309--314.
16.
Gerber, M. M, (1995). Inclusion at the higher-water mark? Some thoughts on Zigmond and Baker's case studies of inclusive educational programs. The Journal of Special Education, 29, 181--191.
17.
Gerber, M. M., & Semmel, M. I, (1984). Teacher as imperfect test: Reconceptualizing the referral process. Educational Psychologist, 19, 137--148.
18.
Gerber, M. M., & Semmel, M. I, (1985). The microeconomics of referral and reintegration: A paradigm for evaluation of special education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 11, 13--29.
19.
Goetz, L., & Sailor, W., (1990). Much ado about babies, murky bath water, and trickle down politics: A reply to Kauffman. The Journal of Special Education, 24, 334--339.
20.
Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman, J. M, Lloyd, J. W, & McKinney, J. D, (1988). Introduction to the series: Questions about the Regular Education Initiative. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 3--5.
21.
Hallahan, D., Keller, C., McKinney, J., Lloyd, J., & Bryan, T., (1988). Examining the research base of the Regular Education Initiative: Efficacy studies and the Adaptive Learning Environments Model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 29--55.
22.
Jenkins, J. R., Jewell, M., Leicester, N., Jenkins, L., & Troutner, N., (1991). Development of a school building model for educating students with handicaps and at-risk students in general education classrooms. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 311--320.
23.
Jenkins, J. R., Jewell, M., Leicester, N., O'Connor, R. E, Jenkins, L. M, & Troutner, N. M, (1994). Accommodations for individual differences without classroom ability groups: An experiment in school restructuring. Exceptional Children, 60, 344--358.
24.
Karweit, N. L., Coleman, M. A, Waclawiw, I., & Petza, R., (1990). Story telling and retelling (STaR): Teacher's manual. Baltimore: John Hopkins University, Center for Research on Effective Schooling for Disadvantaged Students.
25.
Kaufman, M., Kameenui, E., Birman, B., & Danielson, L., (1990). Special education and the process of change: Victim or master of educational reform?Exceptional Children, 57, 109--115.
26.
Light, R., & Pillemer, D., (1982). Numbers and narrative: Combining their strengths in research reviews. Harvard Educational Review, 52(1), 1--26.
27.
MacGinitie, W. H., Kamons, J., Kowalski, R. L, MacGinitie, R. K, & McKay, T., (1978). Gates-MacGinitie reading tests (2nd ed.). Chicago: Riverside.
28.
Madden, N. A., Slavin, R. E, Karweit, N. L, Dolan, L. J, & Wasik, B. A, (1993). Success for all: Longitudinal effects of a restructuring program for inner-city elementary schools. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 123--148.
29.
National Association of State Boards of Education. (1992). Winners all: A call for inclusive school environments: The Report of the NASBE Study Group on Special Education. Alexandria, VA: Author.
30.
Prescott, G. A., Balow, I. H, Hogan, T. P, & Farr, R. C, (1984). Metropolitan achievement tests (MATS). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
31.
Reschly, D. J, (1988). Special education reform: School psychology revolution. School Psychology Review, 17, 459--475.
32.
Reynolds, M. C, Wang, M. C, & Walberg, H. J, (1987). The necessary restructuring of special and regular education. Exceptional Children, 53, 391--398.
33.
Schulte, A. C, Osborne, S. S, & McKinney, J. D, (1990). Academic outcomes for students with learning disabilities in consultation and resource programs. Exceptional Children, 57, 162--172.
34.
Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A, (1995). What makes special education special? Evaluating inclusion programs with the PASS variables. The Journal of Special Education, 29, 224--233.
35.
Sigmon, S., (1990). Critical voices on special education. Albany: State University of New York Press.
36.
Slavin, R. E., Madden, N., Karweit, B. L, & Dolan, L., (1989). Can every child learn? An evaluation of “Success for All” in an urban elementary school. Journal of Negro Education, 58, 357--366.
37.
Slavin, R., Madden, N. A, Karweit, N. L, Livermon, B.J., & Dolan, L., (1990). Success for all: First outcomes of a comprehensive plan for reforming urban education. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 255--278.
38.
Stainback, S., & Stainback, W., (1992). Curriculum considerations in inclusive classrooms: Facilitating learning for all students. Baltimore: Brookes.
39.
Stevens, R. J., Madden, N. A, Slavin, R. E, & Farnish, A. M, (1987). Cooperative integrated reading and composition: Two field experiments. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 433--454.
40.
U.S. Department of Education. (1991). The thirteenth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing House.
41.
Wang, M. C., & Birch, J. W, (1984). Comparison of a full-time mainstreaming program and a resource room approach. Exceptional Children, 5, 33--40.
42.
Wang, M. C, Peverly, S., & Randolph, R., (1984). An investigation of the implementation and effects of a full-time main-streaming program. Remedial and Special Education, 5(6), 21--32.
43.
Wang, M. C, Reynolds, M. C, & Walberg, H.J. (1986). Rethinking special education. Educational Leadership, 44, 26--31.
44.
Wang, M. C, Reynolds, M. C, & Walberg, H.J. (1988). Integrating the children of the second system. Phi Delta Kappan, 70, 248--251.
45.
Will, M., (1984). Let us pause and reflect---But not too long. Exceptional Children, 51, 11--16.
46.
Will, M. C, (1986). Educating children with learning problems: A shared responsibility. Exceptional Children, 52, 411--415.
47.
Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B, (1977). Woodcock-Johnson psycho-educational battery. Hingham, MA: Teaching Resources.
48.
Woodcock, R., & Mather, N., (1989). Woodcock-Johnson tests of achievement---Standard and supplemental batteries. Allen, TX: DLM.
49.
Zigmond, N., & Baker, J., (1990). Mainstream experiences for learning disabled students (Project MELD): Preliminary report. Exceptional Children, 57, 176--185.
50.
Zigmond, N., & Baker, J., (1994). Is the mainstream a more appropriate educational setting for Randy? A case study of one student with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 9, 108--117.
