Increasingly, teacher educators recommend authentic, performance-related measures for evaluating teacher candidates. Nevertheless, more states are requiring teachers to pass high-stakes, minimum-competency exams. This study examined the relation between teacher candidate scores on authentic measures and their scores on certification exams required by the state of Texas. Participants included 155 teacher candidates. Predictor variables that served as authentic measures of teaching effectiveness included scores on the Professional Attributes Questionnaire (PAQ), designed to measure teaching dispositions, and scores on Teaching Performance Portfolios, designed to measure teaching knowledge and skills. Scores on the Professional Roles and Responsibilities (PPR) and the Generalist Elementary Comprehensive (GEC) exams served as the measures for the high-stakes, minimum-competency tests. Findings indicate a significant relationship between the PAQ and both the PPR and the GEC exams. No significant relationship was found between the Teaching Performance Portfolios and either one of the state-mandated tests.
Abdal-Haqq, I. (1999). Unraveling the professional school equity agenda . Peabody Journal of Education, 74(3), 145-160.
2.
American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. (2007). PDSs at a glance. Retrieved October 4, 2007, from http://www.aacte.org/Programs/PDS/faqpds.aspx
3.
American Psychological Association (APA) in Code of Fair Testing. (2005). Section C. 5 Retrieved October 4, 2007, from http://www.apa.org/science/fairtestcode.html
4.
Baker, R.S. (2001). The paradoxes of desegregation: Race, class and education, 1935-1975. American Journal of Education, 109, 320-343.
5.
Blue, T., & O'Grady, J. (2002). Finding the best teachers: A study of relationships among SAT, GPA, Praxis series tests scores and teaching ratings. PennsylvaniaTeacher Educator, 1, 1-12.
6.
Brooks, J., & Brooks, M. (1993). The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
7.
Brown, J.S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning . Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
8.
Campbell-Whatley, G.D. (2003). Recruiting and retaining of culturally and linguistically diverse groups in special education: Defining the problem. Teacher Educationand SpecialEducation, 26(4), 255-263.
9.
Chambers, S., Munday, R., Sienty, S., & Justice, M. (1999). Predictors of success on the Texas state certification tests for secondary teaching. College Student Journal, 33(1), 10-15.
10.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Educational Policy Analysis Archives , 8(1). Retrieved September 8, 2007, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n1/
11.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (2000). Authentic assessment of teaching in context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 523-545.
12.
Darling-Hammond, L., Holtzman, D.J., Gatlin, S.J., & Heilig, J.V. (2005). Does teacher preparation matter? Evidence about teacher certification, Teach for America, and teacher effectiveness. Retrieved April 17, 2006, from http://www.schoolredesign.net/binaries/(teachercert.pdf)
13.
Educational Testing Service. (2005). State requirements. Retrieved March 10, 2006, from http://www.ecs.org/ecsmain.asp?page=/search/default.asp
14.
Elliott, E.J. (2003). Assessing education candidate performance: A look at changing practices. Washington, DC: National Council for Accreditation in Teacher Education.
15.
Fallon, M.A., & Watts, E. (2001). Portfolio assessment and use: Navigating uncharted territory. Teacher Education and Special Education, 24(1), 50-57.
16.
Fetsco, T., & McClure, J. (2005). Educational psychology: An integrated approach to classroom decisions. Boston: Pearson.
17.
Greeno, J.G. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research . American Psychologist, 53, 5-26.
18.
Holmes Group. (1986). Tomorrow's teachers: A report of the Homes Group (ED No. 270 454). East Lansing, MI: Author.
19.
Holmes Group. (1990). Tomorrow's schools: Principles for the design of professional development schools (SP No. 032 87). East Lansing, MI: Author.
20.
Justice, M., & Hardy, J.C. (2001). Minority students and the examination for the certification of educators in Texas. Education, 121, 592-596.
21.
Lave, J. (1993). Situating learning in communities of practice . In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 17-36). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association .
22.
Madaus, G.F. (1994). A technological and historical consideration of equity issues associated with proposals to change the nation's testing policy . Harvard Educational Review, 64(1), 76-91.
23.
National Council for Accreditation in Teacher Education. (2002). Professional standards for the accreditation of schools, colleges and departments of education. Washington, DC: Author.
24.
Nweke, W.C., & Hall, T.R. (1999, April). Evaluating cut-scores on two certification tests: How well do decisions based on cut-scores match teacher- and principal-reported ratings of competence in the classroom?Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
25.
Nicaise, M., & Barnes, D. (1996). The union of technology, constructivism, and teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 47(3), 203-210.
26.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110 (2001).
27.
Podgursky, M. (2005). Teacher licensing in U.S. public schools: The case for simplicity and flexibility. Peabody Journal of Education , 80(3), 15-43.
28.
Pool, J., Dittrich, C., Longwell, E., Pool, K., & Hausfather, S. (2004). An analysis of SAT and Praxis I. Action in Teacher Education, 26(2), 60-68.
29.
Quirk, T., Witten, B., & Weinberg, S. (1973). Review of studies of the concurrent and predictive validity of the national teacher examinations. Review of Educational Research, 43(1), 89-113.
30.
Rice, J. (2004). Teacher quality: Understanding the effectiveness of teacher attributes. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
31.
Stallings, D.T. (2002). A brief history of the U.S. Department of Education . Phi Delta Kappan,83(9), 677-683.
32.
Stevens, J. (1996). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
33.
Tackett, P. (1997). Linking performance to standards assessment in Texas. In National Evaluation Systems (Ed.), Linking standards and assessment (pp. 63-69). Amherst, MA: National Evaluation Systems.
34.
Texas Examinations of Educator Standards, Professional Roles and Responsibilities Preparation Manual. Retrieved June 21, 2007, from http://www.sbec.state.tx.us
35.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (2001). Digest of education statistics, 2000 (NCES 2001-034). Washington, DC: Author.
36.
U.S. Department of Education. (2002). The secretary's report on teacher quality. Washington, DC: Author.
37.
Wakefield, D. (2003). Screening teacher candidates: Problems with high stakes testing. The Educational Forum, 67(4), 380-388.
38.
Wakefield, D. (2006). Taking hope out of teaching. Phi Delta Kappan,88(1), 79-82.
39.
Watras, J. (2003). Can teacher qualifying exams improve education?Educational Foundations, 17(2), 71-85.
40.
White, W.F., & Burke, C.M. (1994). Can Texas teacher certification be predicted from SAT scores and grade point averages? Journal of InstructionalPsychology, 21(3), 298-300.
41.
Yeh, S.S. (2005). Limiting the unintended consequences of high-stakes testing. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(43), 1-21.
