Past research has developed the " probe-latency technique " for assessing the structure of linguistic inputs. Results to date indicate that the probe-latency structure is primarily a function of syntactic relations in the input and is relatively independent of semantic characteristics of the stimulus material. The " question technique ", a second operational method, was developed as an approach to semantic processing. A study using both techniques is described in detail. The results of this study indicate that the question technique has promise as an approach to semantic processes. The study also gives further confirmation to the independence of semantic from syntactic processes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ammon, P. ( 1967). An exploratory study of cognitive processes in speech comprehension by children and adults. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation . Cornell University.
2.
Chomsky, N. ( 1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax (Cambridge).
3.
Chomsky, N. ( 1967). The formal nature of language. In Lenneberg, E., Biological Foundations of Language (New York) .
4.
Katz, J.J. and Fodor, J.A. ( 1963). The structure of semantic theory. Language , 39, 170.
5.
Lenneberg, E. ( 1967). Biological Foundations of Language (New York) .
6.
Miller, G.A. ( 1962). Some psychological studies of grammar. American Psychologist, 17, 748.
7.
Miller, G.A. and Chomsky, N. ( 1963). Finitary models of language users. In Lace, D. R., Bush, R. R. and Galanter, E., Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 11 (New York).
8.
Suci, G.J., Ammon, P. and Gamlin, P. ( 1967). The validity of the probe-latency technique for assessing structure in language. Language and Speech, 10, 69.
