Three experiments are reported that showed effects of “structure priming,” the tendency to repeat syntactic structure across successive sentences. These effects were demonstrated in a previously untested language, Dutch. All experiments studied spoken sentence production. Importantly, pre-experimental baselines were measured for all target structures in order to assess possible effects of frequency on the magnitude of priming effect. We obtained priming with dative sentences, including datives with medially placed prepositional phrases, a sentence type not tested before. In one experiment we obtained priming effects with passives, including passives with sentence-final verbs, which also have never been tested before. However, we failed to obtain priming effects with active transitives. A comparison with the baseline data suggested that priming is not related to baseline frequency. Further, the results allowed us to draw an empirical generalization: Structure priming is a relatively long-term event, lasting at least several trials. The implications of these findings are discussed.
BOCK, J. K. (1977). The effect of pragmatic presupposition on syntactic structure in question answering. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 723–734.
2.
BOCK, J. K. (1986a). Meaning, sound, and syntax: Lexical priming in sentence production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 575–586.
3.
BOCK, J. K. (1986b). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 355–387.
4.
BOCK, J. K. (1987). An effect of the accessibility of word forms on sentence structures. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 119–137.
5.
BOCK, J. K. (1989). Closed-class immanence in sentence production. Cognition, 31, 163–168.
6.
BOCK, J. K., & KROCH, A. S. (1989). The isolability of syntactic processing. In G. N. Carlson & M. K. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Linguistic structure in language processing (pp. 157–196). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
7.
BOCK, J. K., & LEVELT, W. J. (1994). Language production: Grammatical encoding. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 945–984). San Diego: Academic Press.
8.
BOCK, J. K., & LOEBELL, H. (1990). Framing sentences. Cognition, 35, 1–39.
9.
BOCK, J. K., LOEBELL, H., & MOREY, R. (1992). From conceptual roles to structural relations: Bridging the syntactic cleft. Psychological Review, 99(1), 150–171.
10.
BOCK, J. K., & WARREN, R. K. (1985). Conceptual accessibility and syntactic structure in sentence formulation. Cognition, 21, 47–67.
11.
BRANIGAN, H. P., PICKERING, M. J., LIVERSEDGE, S. P., STEWART, A. J., & URBACH, T. P. (1995). Syntactic priming: Investigating the mental representation of language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 489–506.
12.
COHEN, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
13.
COLLINS, P. (1995). The indirect object construction in English: An informational approach. Linguistics, 33, 35–49.
14.
CORNELIS, L. H. (1996). Dutch and English: The passive difference. Language Sciences, 18, 247–264.
15.
CORNELIS, L. H. (1997). Passive and perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
16.
DE SMEDT, K. J. (1990). IPF: An incremental parallel formulator. In R. Dale, C. Mellish, & M. Zock (Eds.), Current research in natural language generation (pp. 167–192). London: Academic Press.
17.
ERTESHIK-SHIR, N. (1979). Discourse constraints on dative movement. In T. Givón (Ed.), Syntax and semantics, Volume 12: Discourse and syntax (pp. 441–467). New York: Seminar Press.
18.
FERREIRA, F. (1994). Choice of passive voice is affected by verb type and animacy. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 715–736.
19.
FEUSTEL, T. C., SHIFFRIN, R. M., & SALASOO, A. (1983). Episodic and lexical contributions to the repetition effect in word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 309–346.
20.
FLORES D'ARCAIS, G. B. (1975). Some perceptual determinants of sentence construction. In !G. B. Flores d'Arcais (Ed.), Studies in perception: Festschrift for Fabio Metelli (pp. 344–373). Milano: Aldo Martello-Giunti Editore.
21.
FORSTER, K. I., & DAVIS, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10(4), 680–698.
22.
GARRETT, M. F. (1975). The analysis of sentence production. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 133–177). New York: Academic Press.
23.
GEERTS, G., HAESERYN, W., ROOIJ, J. de, & TOORN, M. C. van den (Eds.). (1984). Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst [General Dutch Grammar]. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.
24.
GIVÓN, T. (1984). Direct object and dative shifting: Semantic and pragmatic case. In F. Plank (Ed.), Objects: Towards a theory of grammatical relations (pp. 151–182). London: Academic Press,
25.
GLASER, W. R., & DÜNGELHOFF, F.-J. (1984). The time course of picture-word interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 640–654.
26.
HARRIS, M. (1978). Noun animacy and the passive voice: A developmental approach. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 495–504.
27.
HARTSUIKER, R. J. (1996). Sentence production in normals and Broca's aphasics: Stages and resources. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
28.
HARTSUIKER, R. J., & KOLK, H. H. J. (1998). Syntactic facilitation in agrammatic sentence production. Brain and Language, 62, 221–254.
29.
HARTSUIKER, R. J., KOLK, H. H. J., & HUISKAMP, P. (in press). Priming word order in sentence production. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
30.
KEMPEN, G., & HOENKAMP, E. (1987). An incremental procedural grammar for sentence formulation. Cognitive Science, 11, 201–258.
31.
KEMPEN, G., & HUIJBERS, P. (1983). The lexicalization process in sentence production and naming: Indirect election of words. Cognition, 14, 185–209.
32.
LEVELT, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33.
LEVELT, W. J. M., & KELTER, S. (1982). Surface form and memory in question answering. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 78–106.
34.
LOGAN, G. D. (1990). Repetition priming and automaticity: Common underlying mechanisms?Cognitive Psychology, 22, 1–35.
35.
LOMBARDI, L., & POTTER, M. C. (1992). The regeneration of syntax in short term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 713–733.
36.
MAXWELL, S. E., & DELANEY, H. D. (1990). Designing experiments and analyzing data. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks and Cole.
37.
McDONALD, J. L., BOCK, J. K., & KELLY, M. H. (1993). Word and world order: Semantic, phonological, and metrical determinants of serial position. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 188–230.
38.
MITCHELL, D. C., CUETOS, F., CORLEY, M. M. B., & BRYSBAERT, M. (1995). Exposure-based models of human parsing: Evidence for the use of coarse-grained (nonlexical) statistical records. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 469–488.
39.
POLLARD, C., & SAG, I. A. (1994). Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
40.
RAJARAM, S., & NEELY, J. H. (1992). Dissociative masked repetition priming and word frequency effects in lexical decision and episodic recognition tasks. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 152–182.
41.
SCARBOROUGH, D. L., CORTESE, C., & SCARBOROUGH, H. S. (1977). Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 1–17.
42.
TANNENBAUM, P. H., & WILLIAMS, F. (1968). Generation of active and passive sentences as a function of subject or object focus. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 7, 246–250.
43.
TENPENNY, P. L. (1995). Abstractionist versus episodic theories of repetition priming and word identification. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 339–363.
44.
TOMLIN, R. S. (1995). Focal attention, voice, and word order: An experimental, cross-linguistic study. In P. Downing & M. Noonan (Eds.), Word order in discourse (pp. 517–554). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
45.
WEINER, E. J., & LABOV, W. (1983). Constraints on the agentless passive. Journal of Linguistics, 19, 29–58.
