Abstract
Bereavement support is a required practice standard for comprehensive palliative care. However, research to guide supportive care for fathers who experience child loss is scarce. This article presents selected findings illuminating fathers’ need for support, which emerged from a phenomenological study describing fathers’ lived bereavement experience. Eleven participating fathers from the United States and Canada discussed their need for support, which was limited and difficult to access. They offered their perspectives of peer support groups and professional mental health counseling. Participants also provided their recommendations to help health professionals improve supportive care for bereaved fathers. Findings from this study advance the state of the science by incorporating fathers’ voices on what bereavement support was meaningful and important for them.
Bereavement support is a required practice standard for comprehensive pediatric palliative care (National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care, 2018, National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization, 2022). Yet, research remains insufficient to guide best practices that promote health and support bereaved parents’ well-being (Feudtner et al., 2019). According to Mulheron (2025), there is “a scarcity of research that incorporates bereaved people’s voices…without input from those living with grief, researchers cannot know what kinds of care models and interventions should be developed and studied” (para. 6). This is especially true for bereaved fathers since the majority of samples in bereavement research are comprised of mothers leading to significant underrepresentation of fathers (Dutta et al., 2019; Haylett & Tilley, 2021; McNeil et al., 2021; Postavaru et al., 2023).
Literature on men’s perspective of supportive bereavement care is sparse (Aho et al., 2011; Badenhorst et al., 2006; Schoonover et al., 2022). Bereavement support varies and is not always easily accessible (Lichtenthal et al., 2015; Morris & Block, 2015; Morris et al., 2019). Systematic reviews find few studies with methodological limitations, which make it difficult to draw meaningful conclusions on the effectiveness of support interventions (Ahluwalia et al., 2025; Ainscough et al., 2022; Endo et al., 2015; Rowa-Dewar, 2022).
In a scoping review of 52 studies exploring bereaved parents’ perceptions of helpful and unhelpful characteristics of informal support, Schoonover et al. (2022) identified only three articles focused solely on bereaved fathers. These articles generally found that bereaved fathers perceived peer support groups as helpful and fading social support unhelpful (Aho et al., 2009; Samuelsson et al., 2001; Wood & Milo, 2001). In a systematic review of 219 studies exploring interventions to improve care for bereaved people who experienced distinct types of loss, Ahluwalia et al. (2025) found moderate positive effects of psychotherapy and expert-facilitated support groups on grief symptoms. Few studies explored peer support interventions and consequential harms of interventions and Ahluwalia et al. (2025) concluded more research is needed.
Due to the shortage of targeted research on fathers, as opposed to mothers, experiencing loss, there is opportunity to better understand fathers’ perspectives of their bereavement support needs following a child’s death. Emerging from a larger phenomenological study which described fathers’ lived bereavement experience, an essential theme arose related to fathers’ need for a supportive community (Denhup, 2024a, 2024b). This article presents selected findings pertaining to that essential theme of bereaved fathers’ need for support.
Method
This qualitative study, grounded in Heideggerian hermeneutic phenomenology (Heidegger, 1962), aimed to describe and interpret the meaning of fathers’ lived experience of bereavement. The research question was: “What is the lived experience of bereavement among fathers who have experienced the death of a child?”. Phenomenology is the appropriate qualitative method to use when exploring the meaning of a phenomenon as it is experienced (Munhall, 2012). Phenomenology is used to understand people’s perspectives of their life experiences, uncover the essences of the experience, and ascertain the meaning of the experience in terms of what was experienced and how it was experienced (Doucette & Lane, 2025; Neubauer et al., 2019; Renjith et al., 2021).
Heidegger (1962) believed description and interpretation are necessary to understanding the meaning of people’s lived experiences. Consistent with ontological assumptions of interpretive phenomenology, lived experience contains multiple realities and is unique to every individual (Doucette & Lane, 2025; Heidegger, 1962). Heideggerian phenomenology seeks to understand what people experience in their daily lives, in their lifeworlds (Heidegger, 1962; Neubauer et al., 2019).
Heidegger (1962) does not provide specific methodological steps for researchers to conduct phenomenological research. Rather, he offers a philosophical perspective from which research methods could be derived. Thus, the researcher turned to van Manen’s (1997) method framed by Heideggerian philosophy. van Manen’s (1997) method consists of six research activities: (1) turn to the nature of lived experience and commit to a concern; (2) investigate the experience as it is lived; (3) reflect on essential themes that emerge from a three-fold approach to theme identification (wholistic reading, selective highlighting, detailed reading); (4) write and rewrite; (5) maintain a strong and orientated relation; and (6) balance the research while considering parts and whole.
The researcher plays a key role in any interpretive phenomenological inquiry (Neubauer et al., 2019). Heidegger (1962) presented the concept of the hermeneutic circle, whereby understanding arises in a circular fashion in which the researcher brings their own pre-understandings, or fore-conception, about a given phenomenon to the research; seeks to understand the phenomenon by making pre-understandings known; and studies the whole and parts of a phenomenon moving towards an interpretive understanding of lived experience (Earle, 2010; Koch, 1995; McConnell-Henry et al., 2009). The researcher’s lifeworld, including education, knowledge, and past experiences are valuable to the inquiry (Neubauer et al., 2019). Accordingly, the author provides this reflexivity statement: As a PhD-prepared advanced practice registered nurse (APRN), the author came to this research study because of her commitment to advance palliative care nursing science and education to improve quality outcomes and minimize suffering of patients and families. After nearly two decades of clinical nursing practice directly caring for children with serious illnesses and 17 years as an academic nurse educator teaching students to care for children and families, she has dedicated her program of research on bereavement and palliative care scholarship to improve outcomes and minimize suffering. The historical blind spot in nursing practice and education related to fathers’ bereavement, the gap in the literature on fathers’ bereavement, and comments from bereaved fathers, such as “you need to come talk to us”, motivated this authentic exploration of fathers’ lived experience. The author/researcher is not a bereaved parent, nor had any prior relationship with study participants. The author/researcher’s professional qualifications and experience conducting qualitative bereavement research enhance study rigor and trustworthiness of findings.
The researcher’s University granted IRB approval for this study (IRB protocol #3973). All participants provided written informed consent prior to participating in this research. Readers are referred to a prior publication (Denhup, 2024a) for a detailed explanation of the sample, data collection/analysis, and approaches used to ensure trustworthiness. A summary of which follows.
Sample
The researcher used purposive and snowball sampling to recruit a diverse cross-section of 11 fathers through various community-based peer support groups to holistically explore the essence of their bereavement experience. The majority were non-Hispanic/Latino white (10 white, 1 black), college-educated (3 with bachelors, 5 masters, 1 doctoral degree), married (10 married, 1 divorced) men, aged 30-70 (mean 50 years), of different faith/religious backgrounds (3 Jewish, 2 Christian, 1 Mormon, 5 Unaffiliated) from the United States and Canada. Each participant experienced a young child’s death at least one year prior to participation (range 1–22 years prior; mean 9 years prior). One of the 11 participants experienced the death of two children. Participants’ children (8 boys, 4 girls) ranged in age from stillborn-17 years of age at the time of death. The majority (n = 8) were illness-related deaths; six children had cancer and two infants had prematurity complications. One was stillborn at 38 weeks due to placental abruption. The three other children died following a sudden unexpected event; one adolescent with a long-stable cardiac history died during sleep, one child incurred an accidental injury during play, and one adolescent died in a motor vehicle accident. Six participants had surviving children (aged 7–38 years); five did not. All participants were receiving grief support through community-based bereavement peer support groups when interviews were conducted.
Data Collection and Analysis
The researcher engaged in deep phenomenological reflection, documented field notes, and wrote analytic memos while utilizing van Manen’s (1997) method, inclusive of its six research activities and three-fold thematic approach to uncover the essences of fathers’ lived bereavement experience.
The researcher conducted conversational phone interviews privately with each participant on 1–2 occasions (1.15–3.35 h in length/participant, yielding 22 cumulative hours). After introductions to establish rapport and trust, the researcher asked participants: “Please tell me what it has been like for you since your child died”. The researcher probed with silence and neutral sounds, while moving the conversation along with such comments as “Go on”, “Please say more about what it was like for you”, and “Can you think of anything else that would help me to understand what it’s been like for you since your child died?”. The researcher transcribed each audio-recorded interview verbatim and reviewed them for accuracy. Several participants voluntarily shared songs, journal entries, and social media posts that they felt would help the researcher better understand their bereavement experience.
Trustworthiness
The criterion of credibility establishes a “match between the constructed realities of respondents (or stakeholders) and those realities as represented by the evaluator and attributed to various stakeholders” (Lincoln & Guba, 1989, p. 237). Multiple strategies, including prolonged engagement in the field, use of participants’ verbatim quotes, triangulation, and a member-checking process were used to ensure trustworthiness and credibility of this study’s findings.
During prolonged engagement in the field, the researcher was deeply immersed and engaged in phenomenological reflection and writing. Participants’ verbatim quotations were used to accurately capture what the fathers said. Triangulation was used to cross check data and identify findings that converged across time, space, and persons (Denzin, 1989; Kawar et al., 2024). Member-checking further validated credibility of findings. Using informal member-checks in real-time during interviews, the researcher reflected with the participants about what they said to confirm understanding. Participants had the opportunity to read the comprehensive analytic summary and provide feedback through a formal member-checking process, whereby the researcher asked participants “Does the summary resonate with you?” and “Do you see enough of your own experience in the summary that you think could be helpful for other fathers?”. Participants felt the summary deeply resonated with their experience; thus, no changes to the final representation of data were necessary.
Findings
A wholistic structure of the meaning of fathers’ lived bereavement experience emerged:
Bereavement is a life-long journey along which a father navigates through devastating and traumatic loss with great strength; has profound grief that mirrors the profound love he has for his child; chooses to live life with intention and engages in meaningful activities that create purpose aimed at honoring his child, continuing his child’s legacy, and using his own suffering for the good of others; is anchored by a continuing bond of love that fuels an ongoing relationship with his child; and needs a supportive community to sustain him as he travels down the healing road where it is possible to find faith, hope, and love while being forever transformed by loss. (Denhup, 2024a, p. 10)
This interpretive structure includes six essential themes; one of which pertains to fathers’ need for a supportive community. This essential theme includes the following subthemes: (a) fathers need support, (b) support is limited and difficult to access, (c) peer support, (d) support from professional mental health providers, and (e) participants’ recommendations to healthcare providers on how to best support fathers through their bereavement journey.
Participating fathers discussed their need for support and the challenges they faced. Participants shared their perspectives of peer support groups and professional mental health counseling. Participants provided their recommendations to help nurses and other health professionals improve supportive bereavement care, emphasizing what was meaningful and important for them.
Fathers Need Support
Participants discussed their need to express their grief within a supportive community; one which acknowledges fathers’ grief, bears witness to fathers’ grief, and holds a safe space for fathers to grief as they travel on their lifelong bereavement journey. Ryan explained: “Men need support. Men need venues in which to express their grief. It is really, really important to have your feelings, and express your feelings, and get them out of your system. Men need that support; whether that’s therapy, whether that’s peer groups, whether that’s counseling, or all the above. Somewhere where they can have their feelings, and where they can cry, and they can grieve, and they can tell their stories. That is the only thing that can help with healing over time is to be able to do that, to be able to grieve, and to be able to get it out of your system. That is tremendously important. Having somewhere where they can have the safe space to tell their story and can get their feelings out is huge. That is especially huge with men. Post- pandemic, I appreciate there is all this sensitivity about mental health but still we just deal with it so shabbily in the mainstream. It is really about yeah, go to a therapist, take some medication, feel better basically. And fine go to a therapist, but going to a therapist is only like an hour or two a week! There is the rest of the week that you have to deal with”.
Michael agreed that fathers need long-term support, stating: “Recognition of the severe effects that occur to parents, both male and female, [and] supports needed over a long period of time is an important acknowledgment in and of itself. Historically, that hasn’t been recognized as much in the psychological literature. I really strongly believe that setting time limits on proper healing is counterproductive. It really depends on what the person’s experience was in the relationship. The trauma effects magnify everything”.
Support is Limited and Difficult to Access
Participating fathers found bereavement support to be scarce and difficult to access. Eric stated, “There is a lot of support for women. My wife is in a lot of support groups that are women and then next to them, there is nothing for men. There is not enough!”. Michael stated: “I had a difficult time trying to find a grieving parents’ group. It was not easy to find!” Tim stated: “When I was initially going through everything, I didn’t come across a whole lot of resources about how men go through this.”
Matthew explained: “I had just started searching the internet, just everywhere. Going to bookstores, church libraries, anywhere I would think there would be a resource for it. It took a lot of deep diving to finally come across [a book for dads]. I did [a search] in Google. [I] would put information in there, and there would be medical journals or articles, and it would be gravitated towards the moms. Even when you put ‘grieving dads’, or ‘how to grieve as a dad’, or anything like that and it still would default back to mothers. Ten years later still, I look around and still don’t see much out there for dads”. The book that Matthew referred to, entitled Grieving Dads: To the Brink and Back (Farley, 2012), was a breakthrough for him. Matthew explained: “It really wasn’t until I read Kelly’s book on Grieving Dads: To the Brink and Back that I realized there are some fathers out there that went through the same things, especially Kelly himself. I ordered the book immediately [and] read through it a couple times. [I] actually reached out to him. That was really the first time in that process where there was that open ear and curiosity and really the want to help and [from someone who] went through the same thing I was [going through]. When I read the book, [I] felt better. I felt okay. I’m not alone. I can do better. That was the most bonding I had with anyone at that point. So, three years in and finally bonding with other dads. But three years later and [this is] still the only [book] one to deal with that topic”.
Steven stated: “How do you find these things? How do you curate these things? How do you know? You can’t go to everything, but you can’t google these things and easily find them. Nobody’s aggregating in a way that gives you all the information that you need on this journey, and it happens after death. Bereavement only happens after death”. Eric explained: “I know there are dads out there that are very vocal and come together, but there’s not the infrastructure in place to do it because there’s not organization to do it”.
Peer Support
Because supports were not readily available for participants, they spent significant time in frustration before finally stumbling upon a way to connect with other bereaved parents. Once they eventually did, they were finally able to start building a supportive community. It is telling that once a participant was able to make a connection, they were able to start building a supportive community. Participants discussed their experience with several types of peer support, including in-person support group meetings, virtual online support groups, social media/Facebook chats, newsletters, conferences, bereavement retreats, and individually on a 1:1 basis.
Frequency of Peer Support Varies
Daniel attended peer support group meetings regularly after Mateo died; every other week at first, then once a month. Steven attended an online support group once a month. Steven liked this because there are other fathers who were active in this small group. Steven explained: “There is a bunch of people I can call if I was ever in crisis, but it’s hard to find that. It’s a small group and it’s hard to find that. There is a bunch of dads in that small group, which is nice. You don’t find that necessarily anywhere else”. Steven also attended a virtual retreat held three hours per day for two days on a weekend, as well as in-person retreat for bereaved parents. About the bereavement retreat, Steven stated: “The retreat itself it was weird for us because we were there as parents without another child. Everybody else had other children there, and there’s a lot of children’s activities and all that. That was a little bit weird, but [my wife] and I can deal with it and face it”.
Adam went to a peer grief support group for a few months soon after Olivia died, and then stopped attending for a period when he decided to do individual counseling. Adam recently went back to regularly attending the peer grief support group because, as he explained: “I was getting to points where I was learning from my grief. I wanted to get out and talk to people more, and so that led me to the grief group. I’ve been going for about the last 5, 6 months”.
Nick attends two peer support groups, one with his wife and the other by himself. About the latter, Nick stated: “I still have my [support group] that’s all by myself. At first, I wanted [my wife] to come, but now there’s a piece that I’m actually fine with this one like being mine. I haven’t missed a single meeting. I love it”.
Need for Pre-Bereavement Peer Support
Some participants whose child’s death was cancer-related identified a need for peer support prior to their child’s death when they were experiencing anticipatory grief. For example, Steven needed support when he was experiencing anticipatory guidance before Jeremy’s death due to osteosarcoma. Peer support was only available to Steven after Jeremy died, not before when he needed it. Steven stated: “People just don’t understand the need to get support before grief is happening, before the child passes away. You need support then. It’s not that just you grieve after. People don’t understand that, and don’t realize that. I also looked for other dads to talk to. What is this like? How do you deal with this? How do you face this? What do you do with it? How does it feel? What do you do at the funeral? All those questions I had. I couldn’t find anybody. There was actually some people, but nobody would really help me the way I wanted to. I wanted a friend, a peer to go through it. Not really having that support from somebody who could really talk to me about it was really tough! I had a therapist and that was good, but he lost his wife to cancer. He wasn’t a bereaved dad. There wasn’t anybody to really talk with and commiserate. It just really doesn’t exist. I just struggled to find somebody to identify with. There are no pre-bereavement groups. There are only bereavement groups”. Kevin also sought out peer support prior to his child’s death due to osteosarcoma. Unlike Steven, Kevin attended a peer support group that his wife recommended. Kevin shared: “It’s kind of unusual, but I actually went to one meeting when Mason was in his terminal diagnosis. Went out for about 2 h one night because my wife recommended it. I went to that one meeting. It was a little bit of a shock for some people that my child was still living, but they all understood because they were all on the other side of the fence. And sure enough, about two months after Mason died, we started going to the monthly meetings”. Kevin continued to attend in-person peer support group meetings monthly for the first 10 years of his bereavement journey.
Need to Explore Different Types of Peer Support
Some participating fathers felt a need to explore different types of peer support offered by different organizations before they chose the one that was most helpful for them. For example, Daniel sought out peer support through in-person meetings and conferences that were offered by different organizations before he decided to stay with one organization. Daniel explained: “I went to several conferences. You’ll find people going back and forth between groups. They both service the same community. It’s just their model is different. [One is] more business model, and [the other] is more of a volunteer donations model”.
Some participants found peer support through a particular organization to be more helpful than others because it closely aligned with their personal spiritual beliefs. For example, James explained: “This organization really clicked. There are probably thousands of others, but [this organization] really clicked for me because it aligned with the beliefs that I had, and it lets me continue my relationship with my daughter”. About his peer support group, Ryan explained: “They focus on more of a spiritual aspect. They have belief in afterlife. If you’re not open to that, which I am, but if you’re not open to that then that’s not going to work for you”.
Some participants found peer support amongst other parents who experienced the same type of child loss to be most helpful. Steven explained it was most helpful to attend a peer support group for parents who experience a child’s cancer-related death, as opposed to a sudden loss stating: “After [Jeremy] passed, I started to seek out bereavement groups. [I] found [one] that didn’t really help me because there wasn’t really anyone who lost a child to cancer. There were people who lost their kids to accidents, like someone had their kid fall. Some had their kid die from drug overdoses. One kid had a boulder fall on him and crush him. These are all horrible things, but they are different because they didn’t have anticipatory grief. I didn’t find that very meaningful”. Similarly, Eric found peer support with other parents who had a similar child loss experience to be most helpful and explained: “Where I find comfort with other people who lost a child is when it was to cancer. I could wear their shoes, and vice versa”.
Peer Support Benefits and Disadvantages
Peer Support Benefits
Peer Support Disadvantages
Helpful and Unhelpful Peer Support Group Activities
Participants also shared examples of helpful and unhelpful peer support group activities. Helpful peer support group activities included an informational newsletter and a symbolic butterfly release. For example, Michael found his peer support group’s informational newsletter helpful because it provided anticipatory guidance about how to navigate holidays that trigger grief intensity. Michael stated, “They put out a newsletter that was so right on target. Here’s what you need to know. Here’s what you need to do for your holidays. Newsletters [are] very, very helpful”. Tim found a butterfly release to be helpful, stating: “When you don’t have your kids to hold on to or [you can’t] create new things together, something symbolic like a butterfly release that can actually be really helpful”.
Other participants did not find specific group activities helpful, such as reading grief literature, yoga, or creative art projects. For example, Steven shared: “I don’t really personally prescribe to all the different bereavement exercises. I’m not really a big fan of like exercises, like do this reading or whatever. That’s not my thing. That works for some people. I do meditate; but, like music or yoga or art projects, I don’t really see dads doing a lot of that”.
In addition to peer support groups, some participating fathers shared their perspective of professional mental health counseling as another component of a supportive community.
Support from Professional Mental Health Providers
Some participants sought support from professional mental health providers. The amount of professional support varied, from a short-term temporary basis to more sustained long-term support. Some participants perceived professional support to be helpful, while others did not perceive it to be helpful. A few examples follow to illustrate the contrasting individual perspectives of professional support.
Nick attempted to seek professional grief counseling from a therapist; however, none of the therapists to whom he was referred followed up with him. Nick explained: “I tried to get a therapist after I called many. I was referred to many, but none of them called me back. They didn’t call me back. I called my primary care physician to get referrals, and they referred me to them. I called them and left messages and called them and left messages. I guess it’s not meant to be.”
Eric did not perceive professional support from a therapist to be helpful, stating: “I had done some therapy and then I quit it because they don’t get me. I’m just talking, talking, talking. I’ve talked enough. I was out of breath at that point. I don’t know what kind of support I could get on a daily basis. It’s not like there’s a daily support that I need. It’s not like I’m going to go for dialysis or something. It’s not like there’s a magic pill that you could take to cure you. There is Xanax or drugs of that sort, but that doesn’t cure you. All that does is just mask it.”
Ryan perceived professional support to be helpful as he, recalled his therapist’s explanation of therapy: “He said, ‘Having those feelings and really consciously reaching out and sitting with them is like you’re dipping your finger into boiling water. Your hand is in that boiling water anyways, so you might as well notice it and have it in a controlled way through therapy.” Ryan’s therapy included talk therapy, emotional freedom technique (EFT), and eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR), about which he says: “It’s been completely life saving for me”. Ryan also received professional support from a hospice bereavement counselor for two years after Mia’s death. Although this was helpful, Ryan felt two years was not long enough stating: “Having a bereavement counselor for two years who came over to our house every week and was there for us was amazing, but honestly, two years isn’t that long. It was really helpful to have the bereavement counselor”.
Adam shared his perception of professional support he received from a grief counselor, stating: “I think I had expectations that there should be some rapid realization or understanding of why [Olivia died]. At one of my last visits with the counselor it was like 2, 3 months out and then I pulled the plug on it because I [was thinking] ‘I’ve got to focus on work. My wife and I are doing okay. It’s hard. I don’t think I’m getting anything out of this’. I was a little frustrated, but not angry. I think I had expectations that I was supposed to have some epiphany to understand the why behind this already, and here its 2, 3 months out. [The counselor] told me blankly during one of my visits: ‘That is not to come. It may not come for a long time. It’s way, way too early’. I was thinking ‘Oh, he’s just a lazy ass. He doesn’t want to do anything’. That’s where I was at the time, and [now] it’s almost the 6-year point. It was early and things needed to play out more [in] those early months”. Adam’s perception of counseling changed when he resumed professional support two years later, for as he explained: “I realized that counselor was pivotal. He helped sort out a lot of files in my mental cabinet, things that he pointed out. He said, ‘Your daughter’s life was not that 11 months [of cancer]. You had almost nine years with her. There was a lot more to it. If you reduce her life to those 11 months, you sort of reduce her. Even in those 11 months, there were times where you laughed’.” Adam also shared that the counselor helped to reframe his thinking about hope, explaining: “[The counselor said] ‘You had hope’. ‘Hope is a powerful thing.’ I learned not to be angry about hope. I was able to start to shift. I was able to shape a different perspective. He recognized how arrogant was I that I would outlive my daughter. I think that just because I gave birth to her, and that the doctor said she was beautiful, and everything was great, you just live under the assumption that that’s how it will play out. I was able to work through that. I was able to see the death more broadly”.
Steven received professional support from a therapist before and after Jeremy died. Steven shared: “Thank God I found my therapist who said ‘It’s okay. This is what you have. This is how you should feel. What you’re doing is totally fine’ and validating that. It’s hard for men to want to engage with a therapist, who might not necessarily be a male. To find somebody who takes your insurance and is available is really hard. I didn’t know that he had lost his wife to cancer. He didn’t tell me that till later, but just having had that experience made it so much easier for him to share advice of common things”.
Recommendations from Participants to Health Professionals
Participants’ Recommendations to Health Professionals
With an altruistic aim, participants offered their recommendations to help health professionals improve supportive care for bereaved fathers. It was their belief that implementing their suggested recommendations could be helpful for other bereaved fathers. Kevin urged all health professionals to “Listen. Pay attention. Learn. Show compassion. That’s what the world needs”.
Discussion/Implications
By applying interpretive phenomenology using van Manen’s (1997) method, this study provides one interpretation of fathers’ lived bereavement experience associated with child loss. This exploration broadens understanding of the meaning that fathers attribute to their bereavement experience. Understanding meaning can help health professionals gain new appreciation of and learn from fathers’ bereavement experience as they strive to positively influence person-centered supportive bereavement care.
Eleven fathers provided rich descriptions of their lived bereavement experience, articulating their need for a supportive community. However, they had difficulty finding and obtaining support. Literature suggests that societal stereotypes of masculinity and expectations of men’s grief expression, coupled with a general lack of social recognition of men’s grief and ensuing needs create stigma (McKenzie et al., 2022; Obst et al., 2020, 2021; Zinner, 2000). This, in turn, may negatively impact support-seeking and fathers’ overall bereavement experience. Additionally, studies suggest societal expectations and sociocultural patterns of fathers’ role as primary provider for the family, such as caring for and working to financially support their family, may influence grieving (Alam et al., 2012; Arach et al., 2022; Cook, 1988; Denhup, 2024a; Donovan et al., 2021; Grout & Romanoff, 2000; McNeil et al., 2021; Obst et al., 2020; Olson-Garriott et al., 2015). Scholars propose that gender does not determine the way people grieve, but rather that grieving styles are influenced by a myriad of factors, including gender, culture, socialization, temperament, and developmental experiences (Doka and Martin; 2021; Martin & Doka, 2011). Further, the societal assumptions may contribute to sparse accessible support infrastructure as participants themselves identified a lack thereof. There is opportunity to enhance the supportive infrastructure and curate existing support venues which health professionals can then provide to fathers. For example, nurses could compile a list of peer support groups for fathers who are experiencing anticipatory grief before and grief after their child’s death. By proactively providing contact information for and facilitating connections with peer support groups, nurses could relieve the burden placed on fathers to search for support themselves.
Findings reaffirm literature indicating fathers view peer support groups favorably (Aho et al., 2011; Samuelsson et al., 2001; Schoonover et al., 2022; Wood & Milo, 2001). Participants in this study perceived peer support groups to be beneficial because they received support directly from other parents with a shared child-loss experience. They felt understood. They found companionship and formed meaningful relationships with peers. They learned from other parents and were able to support other parents in return.
Findings expand understanding of peer support groups. While participants noted several advantages, they also identified disadvantages including the fact that it is primarily mothers who attend, fathers are less actively engaged when they do attend, and exposure to other bereaved parents who are grieving can intensify fathers’ distress. This aligns with literature suggesting peer support groups that are not facilitated by expert health professionals have unintended consequences, including negative experiences of group participation being emotionally draining, reemphasis on what was lost, feeling like an outsider when other stories are perceived as worse than the participant, and other members talking too much, being negative, or giving advice (Ahluwalia et al., 2025).
Participating fathers also shared their individual perceptions of professional support they received from mental health providers. Professional support was perceived as helpful for some participants, while not helpful for others. Some literature suggests bereaved fathers perceive professional support to be insufficient and provided by uninterested health professionals (Aho et al., 2009, 2011; McCreight, 2004; Wood & Milo, 2001). The contrasting perceptions about professional support among the participating fathers in this study make it difficult to draw inferences and limit generalizability. Future research is exploring fathers’ perceptions of professional support from mental health providers would be beneficial.
This study also generated insight into participating fathers’ recommendations to health professionals, based upon what was meaningful and important to them. While care must be taken to not broadly generalize participants’ recommendations to other populations, health professionals can reflect upon these and consider how they might apply when supporting fathers in their clinical practice setting.
Strengths and Limitations
This study has strengths and limitations that warrant consideration. This study provides one interpretation of the meaning of fathers’ lived experience of bereavement, as richly described by 11 participants to address a gap due to underrepresentation of fathers in the literature. Participants validated the study’s findings through a member-checking process; this is a noted strength. However, as is true of all hermeneutic research, there may be other plausible interpretations (Van Manen, 1997). Findings are representative of the participants, which limits generalizability to other populations of bereaved fathers.
Eleven participants reflected upon their lived experience at one point in time. The study did not aim to explore fathers’ perceptions of bereavement support specifically. Rather, participants’ need for a supportive community emerged as an essential theme of their bereavement experience. Future studies investigating fathers’ perceptions of bereavement support effectiveness, both peer support groups and professional support, is warranted.
As is typical of qualitative research (Kawar et al., 2024), the sample was small but adequate to achieve data saturation. The sample was homogeneous, with the majority being white, college-educated, married men from Western culture who actively participated in peer support groups. The study would have benefited from a greater representation of fathers from diverse racial, cultural, and socio-economic backgrounds. The study would have also benefited from fathers who do not participate in support groups. At the time of their interview, these well-educated men had support systems in place to help them grieve. It is possible that the bereavement experience and associated grief could be different for fathers who do not have the means nor access to peer support groups and/or professional support. While there are advantages to recruiting participants from support groups, including that participants have already begun to tell their stories to others, are likely personally invested in the research topic, and likely to find the research topic to be of importance (Cacciatore et al., 2013), doing so excludes fathers who are not in support groups from research studies. This is an underrepresented population of bereaved fathers that warrants further exploration. Further, cultural norms can influence perspectives of death and grief expression (Aeschlimann et al., 2024). Thus, further research exploring bereavement as it is lived by culturally diverse fathers and to explore culturally sensitive support needs is warranted. Support needs of marginalized and underrepresented fathers remain unknown. Future studies should investigate the support needs of fathers from minority ethnic backgrounds, fathers of low socioeconomic status, non-married fathers, fathers in the LGBTQIA + community, as well as fathers of adult children. It is likely such lifeworld factors could influence the meaning of their lived bereavement experience and how they grieve as a bereaved father.
The sample was also heterogeneous with regards to participants’ faith/religion, time since child’s death, and cause of child’s death. Studies suggest grief is experienced differently depending on factors, such as time post loss and death circumstances (Alam et al., 2012; Champion & Kilcullen, 2023; Lichtenthal et al., 2013; McNeil et al., 2021; Meij et al., 2008; Morris & Block, 2012; Prigerson et al., 2009). In this study which explored the phenomenon of bereavement, the nature of the lived bereavement experience with essential themes resonated with each participant regardless of the cause of their child’s death or length of time post loss. This unique triangulation is a noted strength.
Conclusion
By sharing what was meaningful and important to them, participating fathers hoped health professionals could learn from them and thought their input could be helpful for other fathers who experience child loss. This input from bereaved fathers who are living with grief helps to address Mulheron’s (2025) call for research that includes the voices and input of bereaved people. While more targeted research is needed for bereaved fathers, including greater diversity among participants and viewpoints during their grief and bereavement journey, this study amplifies fathers’ voice in the literature, deepens understanding of the nature of fathers’ lived bereavement experience, and illuminates fathers’ perceived needs for a supportive community.
Footnotes
Informed Consent
All participants provided written informed consent prior to participating to conduct and publish the research.
Ethical Considerations
Fairfield University approved the study via expedited review (3973) on 5/4/2022.
Funding
The author received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Data Availability Statement
It is not possible to share data because it could identify research participants.
