The contribution of individual differences in physiological arousal to intellective assessment in learning disabled children was studied. Arousal was measured by salivary response and intellective function (receptive vocabulary) by the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. It was predicted that best performance would be found at intermediate levels of arousal. Peabody scores of learning disabled subjects of high, middle, and low arousal showed a non-significant trend in the predicted direction. Reasons for the lack of significance of this hypothesized trend were proposed and needed research outlined.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BerlyneD. E.Conflict, arousal and curiosity.New York: McGraw-Hill, 1960
2.
BremerF.The neurophysiological problem of sleep. In DelafresnayeJ. F. (Ed.), Brain mechanisms and consciousness.Oxford, Eng.: Blackwell, 1954. Pp. 137–158
3.
DavisF. B.The measurement of mental capability through evoked-potential recordings. Educational Records Research Bulletin Number 1, Educational Records Bureau, Greenwich, Connecticut, 1971
4.
DuffyE.Activation and behavior.New York: Wiley, 1962
5.
ErtlJ. P.Evoked potentials, neural efficiency and I. Q. Paper presented at the International Symposium for Biocybernetics, Washington, D. C., 1968
6.
FarleyF. H.The threshold of fusion of paired light flashes as a function of age in normal adults. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1969, 114, 143–148
7.
FarleyF. H.Short- and long-term retention in the paired-associate and connected-discourse learning of children and adults as a function of individual differences in intrinsic arousal. Paper presented at Midwestern Psychological Association Annual Meeting, Cincinnati, May, 1970
8.
FarleyF. H.A theoretical-predictive model of creativity. Paper presented at annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, New Orleans, September, 1974
