The study examines the argot (jargon) of prisoners as a reflection of the norms and values comprising the inmate subculture in Israeli prisons. The phenomenological interview method was used to examine the language of a sample of long-term prisoners for the existence of an inmate argot. Having established that such an argot does exist, the data were subjected to a content analysis, and the salience of the argot terms was assessed using two measures, attention and intensity. The argot expressions were divided into categories with reference to different aspects of prison experience: prisoner status (informers, inmate rank), drugs, sexual relations in prison, violence, prisoner behaviors, nicknames for police officers, and prison staff.
References
1.
Alatis, J. E.
(1992). Language, communication and social meaning. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
2.
Andersson, L.
, & Trudgill, P. (1990). Bad language. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
3.
Bondesson, U.
(1989). Prisoners in prison societies. New-Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
4.
Bowker, L. H.
(1980). Prison victimization. New York: Elsevier.
5.
Briggs, C. L.
(1986). Learning how to ask: A sociolinguistic appraisal of the role of the interview in social science research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Clemmer, D.
(1940). The prison community. New York: Rinehart.
7.
Cordilia, A.
(1983). The making of an inmate. Cambridge, MA: Schenkmann.
8.
Dean-Brown, J.
(1992). Social meaning in language, curriculum of language and through language curriculum. In J. E. Alatis (Ed.), Language communication and social meaning. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
9.
Dietrich, R.
, & Graumann, F. C. (1989). Language processing in social context. Amsterdam: North Holland.
10.
Elaine, C.
(1982). Language: The social mirror. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
11.
Farrington, D. P.
(1994). Psychological explanations of crime. Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth.
12.
Fisher, S.
(1990). On the move: The psychology of change and transition. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
13.
Fishman, J. A.
(1972). The sociology of language: An interdisciplinary social science approach to language in society. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
14.
Gans, H. J.
(1962). The urban villages: Group and class in the life of Indian-Americans. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
15.
Giallombardo, R.
(1974). The social world of imprisoned girls. New York: Wiley
16.
Goffman, E.
(1961). Asylums. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
17.
Halliday, M.A.K.
(1977). Language structure and language function. In J. Lyons (Ed.), New horizons in linguistic structure. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
18.
Hawkins, R.
, & Alpert, P. G. (1989). American prison systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
19.
Hebdige, D.
(1985). Subculture: The meaning of style. London: Methuen.
20.
Hudson, R. A.
(1980). Sociolinguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Irwin, J.
(1980). Prisons in turmoil. Boston: Little, Brown.
22.
Irwin, J.
(1985). The jail. Berkeley: University of California Press.
23.
Irwin, J.
, & Cressey, D. (1962). Thieves, convicts and the inmate culture. Social Problems, 10, 142-155.
24.
Johnson, E. H.
(1987). Handbook on crime and delinquency prevention. New York: Greenwood Press.
25.
Jones, B. L.
(1988). Legal protection of civil liberties. London: Butterworth.
26.
Kalinich, D. B.
(1980). The inmate economy. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
27.
Kassebaum, G.
, Ward, D., & Wilner, D. (1971). Prison treatment and parole survival. New York: Wiley.
28.
Kidder, H. L.
, & Judd, C. M. (1986). Research methods in social relations. New York: CBS College.
29.
Kockelmans, J. J.
(1987). Phenomenological psychology. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: M. Nijhoff.
30.
Krippendorff, K.
(1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
31.
Lockwood, D.
(1980). Prison sexual violence. New York: Elesvier/North Holland.
32.
Lofland, J.
(1971). Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
33.
Mannheim, H.
(1965). The defenses of the weak. London: Routledge, Kegan & Paul.
34.
Matoesian, G. M.
(1993). Reproducing rape: Domination through talk in the courtroom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35.
Maurer, D.
(1955). Whiz mob. American Dialect Society, 24, 313-329.
36.
Maurer, D.
(1981). Language of the underworld. Lexington, KY: The University Press.
37.
Maykut, P.
, & Morehouse, R. (1994). Beginning qualitative research: A philosophic and practical guide. Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
38.
Nielson, A.
, & Scrapitti, T. (1995). Argot use in therapeutic community. Deviant Behavior, 16(3), 127-129.
39.
Parisi, N.
(1982). Coping with imprisonment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
40.
Partridge, E.
(1970). Slang today and yesterday. London: Routledge, Kegan & Paul.
41.
Polkinghorne, D. E.
(1989). Phenomenological research methods. In R. S. Valle & S. Halling (Eds.), Existential phenomenological perspectives in psychology. New York: Plenum.
42.
Proshansky, H. M.
(1970). Environmental psychology: Man and his physical setting. New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston.
43.
Roebuck, J.
(1963). A critique of thieves, convicts and the inmate culture. Social Problems, 11, 193-201.
44.
Sapir, E.
(1951). The study of language as a science. In D. G. Mandelbaum (Ed.), Selected writings of E. Sapir. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
45.
Silvermann, D.
(1993). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analyzing talk, text and introduction. London: Sage.
46.
Strauss, A.
, & Corbin, J. (1990). Basic of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
47.
Strong, H. A.
(1981). Introduction to the study of the history of language. London: Longmans.
48.
Suchman, L.
, & Jordan, B. (1990). International troubles in face-to-face survey interviews. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 232-241.
49.
Sykes, M. G.
(1958). The society of captives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
50.
Sykes, M. G.
, & Messinger, S. L. (1960). The inmate social code and its functions. Social Science Research Council, 15, 401-405.
51.
Thomas, C. W.
, & Pool, E. C. (1975). The consequences of incompatible goal structures in correctional settings. International Journal of Criminology and Penology, 3, 35.
52.
Tittle, C. R.
, & Tittle, D. (1965). Structural handicaps to therapeutic participation: A case study. Social Problems, 13, 81-94.
53.
Toch, H.
(1992). Mosaic of despair. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
54.
Toch, H.
, & Johnson, R. (1982). The pains of imprisonment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
55.
Weber, R. P.
(1990). Basic content analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
56.
Wooden, W. S.
(1982). Men behind bars: Sexual exploitation in prison. New York: Plenum.
57.
Wozner, Y.
(1985). Institution as community. Child and Youth Services, 7(3-4), 71-89.
