Socioeconomic Disadvantage as a Social Determinant of Teen Childbearing in the U.S.

Abstract

Objective.

We reviewed the literature focused on socioeconomic influences on teen childbearing and suggested directions for future research and practice related to this important indicator of teen sexual health.

Methods.

We conducted an electronic search of Medline, ERIC, PsychLit, and Sociological Abstracts databases for articles published from January 1995 to November 2011. Selected articles from peer-reviewed journals included original quantitative analyses addressing socioeconomic influences on first birth among teen women in the U.S. Articles were abstracted for key information, ranked for quality according to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines, assessed for bias, and synthesized.

Results.

We selected articles with a range of observational study designs. Risk for bias varied across studies. All 12 studies that considered socioeconomic factors as influences on teen childbearing (vs. moderators or mediators of other effects) reported at least one statistically significant association relating low socioeconomic status, underemployment, low income, low education levels, neighborhood disadvantage, neighborhood physical disorder, or neighborhood-level income inequality to teen birth. Few reports included any associations contradicting this pattern.

Conclusions.

This review suggests that unfavorable socioeconomic conditions experienced at the community and family levels contribute to the high teen birth rate in the U.S. Future research into social determinants of sexual health should include multiple levels of measurement whenever possible Root causes of teen childbearing should be evaluated in various populations and contexts Interventions that address socioeconomic influences at multiple levels could positively affect large numbers of teens and help eliminate disparities in teen childbearing.

References

Hamilton

Martin

Ventura

. Births: preliminary data for 2010. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2011 Nov 17;60:1–25.

Kearney

. Teen pregnancy prevention. In: Levine

Zimmerman

, editors. Targeting investments in children: fighting poverty when resources are limited. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2010. p. 221–47.

Korenman

Fales

. The socioeconomic effects of teenage childbearing: a review of the recent literature. Report to the Bureau of Maternal, Infant, and Reproductive Health, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. New York: Baruch College, City University of New York, School of Public Affairs; 2011.

Mathews

MacDorman

. Infant mortality statistics from the 2006 period linked birth/infant death data set. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2010 Apr 30;58:1–32.

Martin

Hamilton

Sutton

Ventura

Mathews

Osterman

MJK

. Births: final data for 2008. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2010 Dec 8;59:1–72.

World Health Organization. Health topics: sexual health [cited 2012 Nov 18]. Available from: URL: http://www.who.int/topics/sexual_health/en

Mathews

Sutton

Hamilton

Ventura

. State disparities in teenage birth rates in the United States. NCHS Data Brief No. 46. Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics (US); 2010.

Ventura

Mathews

Hamilton

Sutton

Abma

. CDC health disparities and inequalities report—United States, 2011: adolescent pregnancy and childbirth—United States, 1991–2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2011; 60(Suppl):105–8.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US). Establishing a holistic framework to reduce inequities in HIV, viral hepatitis, STDs, and tuberculosis in the United States: an NCHHSTP white paper on social determinants of health, 2010 Atlanta: CDC, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention (US) stablishing a holistic framework to reduce inequities in HIV, viral hepatitis, STDs, and tuberculosis in the United States: an NCHHSTP white paper on social determinants of health, 2010 Atlanta: CDC, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention (US); 2010.

10.

Wilson

. When work disappears: the world of the new urban poor. New York: Knopf; 1996.

11.

Wilson

. The truly disadvantaged: the inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1987.

12.

Sucoff

Upchurch

. Neighborhood context and the risk of childbearing among metropolitan-area black adolescents. Am Soc Rev 1998; 63:571–85.

13.

Massey

Shibuya

. Unraveling the tangle of pathology: the effect of spatially concentrated joblessness on the well-being of African Americans. Soc Sci Res 1995; 24:352–66.

14.

South

Baumer

. Deciphering community and race effects on adolescent premarital childbearing. Social Forces 2000; 78:1379–407.

15.

South

Crowder

. Neighborhood effects on family formation: concentrated poverty and beyond. Am Soc Rev 1999; 64:113–32.

16.

Moore

Miller

Glei

Morrison

. Adolescent sex, contraception, and childbearing: a review of recent research. Washington: Child Trends, Inc.; 1995.

17.

Leventhal

Brooks-Gunn

. The neighborhoods they live in: the effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes. Psychol Bull 2000; 126:309–37.

18.

Harris

Helfand

Woolf

Lohr

Mulrow

Teutsch

Current methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force: a review of the process. Am J Prev Med 2001; 20(3 Suppl):21–35.

19.

MANILA Consulting Group, Inc. Family planning methodology—outreach. Report prepared for the Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US). McLean (VA): MANILA Consulting Group, Inc.; 2011.

20.

Dormire

Yarandi

. Predictors of risk for adolescent childbearing. Appl Nurs Res 2001; 14:81–6.

21.

Liao

Wang

Laymon

. Predicting teen live birth rates using selected census-derived indicators, Lancaster County, South Carolina, 1990. J Public Health Manag Pract 1999; 5:21–2.

22.

Bickel

Weaver

Williams

Lange

. Opportunity, community, and teen pregnancy in an Appalachian state. J Educ Res 1997; 90:175–81.

23.

Dehlendorf

Marchi

Vittinghoff

Braveman

. Sociocultural determinants of teenage childbearing among Latinas in California. Matern Child Health J 2010; 14:194–201.

24.

Blake

Bentov

. Geographical mapping of unmarried teen births and selected sociodemographic variables. Public Health Nurs 2001; 18:33–9.

25.

Driscoll

Sugland

Manlove

Papillo

. Community opportunity, perceptions of opportunity, and the odds of an adolescent birth. Youth Soc 2005; 37:33–61.

26.

Hogan

Sun

Cornwell

. Sexual and fertility behaviors of American females aged 15–19 years: 1985, 1990, and 1995. Am J Public Health 2000; 90:1421–5.

27.

Kirby

Coyle

Gould

. Manifestations of poverty and birthrates among young teenagers in California zip code areas. Fam Plann Perspect 2001; 33:63–9.

28.

Manlove

. The influence of high school dropout and school disengagement on the risk of school-age pregnancy. J Res Adolesc 1998; 8:187–220.

29.

Gold

Kawachi

Kennedy

Lynch

Connell

. Ecological analysis of teen birth rates: association with community income and income inequality. Matern Child Health J 2001; 5:161–7.

30.

Wei

Hipwell

Pardini

Beyers

Loeber

. Block observations of neighbourhood physical disorder are associated with neighbourhood crime, firearm injuries and deaths, and teen births. J Epidemiol Community Health 2005; 59:904–8.

31.

Campa

Eckenrode

. Pathways to intergenerational adolescent childbearing in a high-risk sample. J Marriage Family 2006; 68:558–72.

32.

Gest

Mahoney

Cairns

. A developmental approach to prevention research: configural antecedents of early parenthood. Am J Community Psychol 1999; 27:543–65.

33.

Stevens

Cho

. Socioeconomic indexes and the new 1980 census occupational classification scheme. Soc Sci Res 1985; 14:142–68.

34.

Adams

Weakliem

August

. Hollingshead's “four-factor index of social status”: from unpublished paper to citation classic. Yale J Sociol 2011; 8:11–20.

35.

Burton

. Teenage childbearing as an alternative life-course strategy in multigeneration black families. Human Nature 1990; 1:123–43.

36.

Furstenberg

Jr . As the pendulum swings—teenage childbearing and social concern. Family Relations 1991; 40:127–38.

37.

Douglas

Jr . Advancing a public health approach to improve sexual health in the United States: a framework for national efforts. Paper presented at the International Perspectives on Sexual Health National HIV Prevention Conference; 2011 Aug 16; Atlanta.

38.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US). A public health approach for advancing sexual health in the United States: rationale and options for implementation. Meeting report of an external consultation. Atlanta: CDC; 2010.

39.

Frieden

. A framework for public health action: the health impact pyramid. Am J Public Health 2010; 100:590–5.

40.

Braveman

Cubbin

Egerter

Chideya

Marchi

Metzler

Socioeconomic status in health research: one size does not fit all. JAMA 2005; 294:2879–88.

41.

Wingo

Lesesne

Smith

de Ravello

Espey

Arambula

Solomon TG

Geographic variation in trends and characteristics of teen childbearing among American Indians and Alaska natives, 1990–2007. Matern Child Health J 2011; 16:1779–90.

42.

Adimora

Auerbach

. Structural interventions for HIV prevention in the United States. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2010; 55 Suppl 2:S132–5.

43.

Gavin

Catalano

David-Ferdon

Gloppen

Markham

. A review of positive youth development programs that promote adolescent sexual and reproductive health. J Adolesc Health 2010; 46(3 Suppl):S75–91.

44.

Sexual experience and contraceptive use among female teens—United States, 1995, 2002, and 2006–2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2012; 61(17):297–301.

45.

Foster

Biggs

Rostovtseva

de Bocanegra

Darney

Brindis

. Estimating the fertility effect of expansions of publicly funded family planning services in California. Womens Health Issues 2011; 21:418–24.

46.

Kearney

Levine

. Subsidized contraception, fertility, and sexual behavior. Rev Econ Stat 2009; 91:137.

47.

Lindrooth

McCullough

. The effect of Medicaid family planning expansions on unplanned births. Womens Health Issues 2007; 17:66–74.