A Value-Theoretic Approach to Childbirth and Reproductive Engineering

Abstract

Social and technical changes in reproduction are drawing childbirth into the marketplace. People are creating new relations that separate genetic, gestational and social parentage. Reproductive engineering makes options of in vitro fertilization, embryo transfer, surrogacy, and fetal tissue transplants. This paper explores an analogy between childbearing and social labor, arguing that the labor theory of value gives insight into the social functions of childbirth under capitalism. The valorization of childbearing is consistent with other ways of socializing the reproduction of labor power despite the capitalists' need for an autonomously functioning private household sector. A value-theoretic approach is necessary to reveal how childbearing is being placed in material relation with other forms of labor under capitalism. Neither reproductive engineering nor biological difference are themselves sources of oppression for women, but when found in a historical context where value can be extracted, childbearing can become a form of alienated labor.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Al-Hibri

Azizah

. 1983. “Reproduction, Mothering, and the Origins of Patriarchy.” In Trebilcot, 1983.

Allen

Jeffner

. 1983. “Motherhood: The Annihilation of Women.” In Trebilcot, 1983.

American Fertility Society. 1986. “Ethical Considerations of the New Reproductive Technologies.” Fertility and Society, supplement 1 46:3 (September).

Andrews

Lori B.

1986. “My Body, My Property.” Hastings Center Report (October), 28–38.

Arditti

Rita

, Renate

Duelli Klein

and Shelley

Minden

, eds. 1984. Test Tube Women: What Future for Motherhood? London: Pandora Press.

Arthur

Chris

. 1979. “Dialectics and Labour.” In John

Mepham

and Ruben

D.-H.

, eds., Issues in Marxist Philosophy I: Dialectics and Method. New York: Humanities Press.

Atwood

Margaret

. 1985. The Handmaid's Tale. New York: Fawcett Crest Books.

Begley

Sharon

. 1993. “Cures from the Womb.” Newsweek (February 22).

Davis

Angela

. 1981. Women, Race and Class. New York: Random House.

10.

De Beauvoir

Simone

. 1953. The Second Sex. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

11.

Dickinson

James

and Bob

Russell

. 1986. Family, Economy and State: The Social Reproduction Process Under Capitalism. New York: St. Martin's Press.

12.

Engels

Frederick

. 1972. The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State. New York: International Publishers.

13.

Firestone

Shulamith

. 1970. The Dialectic of Sex. New York: William Morrow and Company.

14.

Gordon

Linda

. 1976. Woman's Body, Woman's Right: A Social History of Birth Control in America. New York: Grossman Publishers.

15.

Himmelfarb

Gertrude

. 1983. The Idea of Poverty: England in the Early Industrial Age. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

16.

Hull

Richard

. 1990. Ethical Issues in the New Reproductive Technologies. Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

17.

Kimbrell

Andrew

. 1993. The Human Body Shop. New York: Harper and Row,

18.

Kittay

Eva Feder

. 1983. “Womb Envy: An Explanatory Concept.” In Trebilcot, 1983.

19.

Kulikoff

Allan

. 1986. Tobacco and Slaves: The Development of Southern Cultures in the Chesapeake 1680-1800. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

20.

Leacock

Eleanor Burke

. 1981a. Myths of Male Dominance: Collected Articles on Women Cross-Culturally. New York: Monthly Review Press.

21.

Leacock

Eleanor Burke

. 1981b. “History, Development, and the Division of Labor by Sex: Implications for Organization.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 7:2 (Winter).

22.

Marx

Karl

. 1977a. Capital, Vol. I. New York: Vintage Books.

23.

Marx

Karl

. 1977b. “On James Mill.” In David

McLellan

, ed., Karl Marx: Selected Writings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

24.

Marx

Karl

. 1973. Grundrisse. New York: Vintage Books.

25.

Mies

Maria

. 1986. Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale: Women in the International Division of Labour. London: Zed Books.

26.

Mies

Maria

. 1988. “From the Individual to the Dividual: In the Supermarket of ‘Reproductive Alternatives.'” Reproductive and Genetic Engineering, 1:3, 225–237.

27.

O'Brien

Mary

. 1982. The Politics of Reproduction. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

28.

Pollitt

Katha

. 1990. “A New Assault on Feminism.” The Nation (March 26).

29.

Rubin

Isaak Illich

. 1972. Essays on Marx's Theory of Value. Detroit: Black and Red.

30.

Russell

Kathryn

. 1984. “The Internal Relation Between Production and Reproduction: Reflections on the Manipulation of Family Life in South Africa.” Journal of Social Philosophy, XV:2 (Summer), 14–25.

31.

Sayers

Janet

, Mary

Evans

, and Nanneke

Redclift

, eds. 1987. Engels Revisited. New York: Tavistock Publications.

32.

Shaikh

Anwar

. 1990. “Abstract and Concrete Labor.” In John

Eatwell

, Murray

Milgate

and Peter

Newman

, eds., Marxian Economics. New York: W. W. Norton.

33.

Smith

Paul

. 1978. “Domestic Labour and Marx's Theory of Value.” In Annette

Kuhn

and Annemarie

Wolpe

, eds., Feminism and Materialism: Women and Modes of Production. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

34.

Trebilcot

Joyce

, ed. 1983. Mothering: Essays in Feminist Theory. Totowa, New Jersey: Rowman and Allanheld.

35.

Vogel

Lise

. 1983. Marxism and the Oppression of Women: Toward a Unitary Theory. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.

36.

Vogel

Lise

. 1993. Mothers on the fob: Maternity Policy in the U. S. Workplace. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.