Social network analysis can enrich school-based research on children's peer relationships. Unfortunately, accurate network analysis requires near-complete data on all students and is underutilized in school-based research because of low rates of parental consent. This article advocates Krackhardt's cognitive social structures (CSS) as a solution to the problem of missing data in social network research. It compares CSS to other common strategies for dealing with missing data and shows how CSS can be used to yield more complete and precise network data. The article also uses an example of a sixth-grade classroom network to demonstrate the application of CSS and potential analyses.
References
1.
BatchelderWilliam H.KumbasarEceBoydJohn P.. 1997. “Consensus Analysis of Three-Way Social Network Data”. Journal of Mathematical Sociology22:29–58.
2.
BernardH. RussellKillworthPeterKronenfieldDavidSailorLee. 1984. “The Problem of Informant Accuracy: The Validity of Retrospective Data”. Annual Review of Anthropology13:495–517.
3.
BondonioDaniele. 1998. “Predictors of Accuracy in Perceiving Informal Social Networks”. Social Networks20:301–30.
ButtsCarter T.2003. “Network Inference, Error, and Informant (In)accuracy: A Bayesian Approach”. Social Networks25:103–40.
6.
CairnsRobert B.CairnsBeverley D.. 1994. Lifelines and Risks. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
7.
CairnsRobert B.CairnsBeverley D.NeckermanHolly J.GestScott D.GariepyJean-Louis. 1988. “Social Networks and Aggressive Behavior: Peer Support or Peer Rejection?”. Developmental Psychology24:815–23.
8.
CairnsRobert B.GariepyJean-LouisKindermannThomas. 1990. “Identifying Social Clusters in Natural Settings.”Unpublished manuscript, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
9.
CairnsRobert B.LeungMan-ChiBuchananLisaCairnsBeverley D.. 1995. “Friendships and Social Networks in Childhood and Adolescence: Fluidity, Reliability, and Intercorrelations”. Child Development66:1330–45.
10.
CairnsRobert B.PerrinJane E.CairnsBeverley D.. 1991. “Social Structure and Social Cognition in Early Adolescence: Affiliative Patterns”. Journal of Early Adolescence5:339–55.
11.
CampbellDonald T.FiskeDonald W.. 1959. “Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix”. Psychological Bulletin56:81–105.
12.
CasciaroTiziana. 1998. “Seeing Things Clearly: Social Structure, Personality, and Accuracy in Social Network Perception”. Social Networks20:331–51.
13.
DavidCorrine F.KistnerJanet A.. 2000. “Do Positive Self Perceptions Have a ‘Dark Side”’ Examination of the Link Between Perceptual Bias and Aggression”. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology28:327–37.
14.
EnnettSusan T.BaumanKarl E.. 1993. “Peer Group Structure and Adolescent Cigarette Smoking: A Social Network Analysis”. Journal of Health and Social Behavior34:226–36.
15.
EnnettSusan T.BaumanKarl E.. 1994. “The Contribution of Influence and Selection to Adolescent Peer Group Homogeneity: The Case of Adolescent Cigarette Smoking”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology67:653–63.
16.
EnnettSusan T.BaumanKarl E.. 1996. “Adolescent Social Networks: School, Demographic, and Longitudinal Considerations”. Journal of Adolescent Research11:194–215.
17.
FreemanLinton C.1978–79. “Centrality in Social Networks: Conceptual Clarification”. Social Networks1:215–39.
18.
FreemanLinton C.RomneyA. KimballFreemanSue C.. 1987. “Cognitive Structure and Informant Accuracy”. American Anthropologist89:310–25.
19.
GeorgeThomas P.HartmannDonald P.. 1996. “Friendship Networks of Unpopular, Average, and Popular Children”. Child Development67:2301–16.
20.
HallinanMaureen T.1979. “Structural Effects on Children's Friendships and Cliques”. Social Psychology Quarterly42:43–54.
21.
HannemanRobert A.RiddleMark. 2005. Introduction to Social Network Methods. Riverside, CA: University of California, Riverside (published in digital form at http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman).
22.
HymelShelleyBowkerAnneWoodyErik. 1993. “Aggressive versus Withdrawn Unpopular Children: Variations in Peer and Self-Perceptions in Multiple Domains”. Child Development64:879–96.
23.
KiesnerJeffPoulinFrançoisNicotraEraldo. 2003. “Peer Relations Across Contexts: Individual-Network Homophily and Network Inclusion in and After School”. Child Development74:1328–43.
24.
KindermannThomas. 1998. “Children's Development Within Peer Groups: Using Composite Social Maps to Identify Peer Networks and to Study their Influences.” Pp. 55–82 in Sociometry Then and Now: Building on Six Decades of Measuring Children's Experiences with the Peer Group, New Directions for Child Development No. 80, edited by BukowskiWilliam M.CillessenAntonius H.. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25.
KlovdahlAlden S.2005. “Social Network Research and Human Subject Protection: Toward More Infectious Disease Control”. Social Networks27:119–37.
26.
KrackhardtDavid. 1987. “Cognitive Social Structures”. Social Networks9:109–34.
27.
KrackhardtDavid. 1990. “Assessing the Political Landscape: Structure, Cognition, and Power in Organizations”. Administrative Science Quarterly35:342–69.
28.
KrackhardtDavidPorterLyman W.. 1985. “When Friends Leave: A Structural Analysis of the Relationship between Turnover and Stayers' Attitudes”. Adminstrative Science Quarterly30:242–61.
29.
MoodyJames. 2001. “Race, School Integration, and Friendship Segregation in America”. American Journal of Sociology107:679–716.
30.
National Bureau of Standards. 1950. Tables of the Binomial Probability Distribution. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
31.
PattersonCharlotte J.KupersmidtJanis B.GrieslerPamela C.. 1990. “Children's Perceptions of Self and of relationships with Others as a Function of Sociometric Status”. Child Development61:1335–49.
32.
RogersEverett M.KincaidD. Lawrence. 1982. Communication Networks: Toward a New Paradigm for Research. New York: Free Press.
33.
RomneyA. KimballWellerSusan C.BatchelderWilliam H.. 1986. “Culture as Consensus: A Theory of Culture and Informant Accuracy”. American Anthropologist88:313–38.
34.
RyanAllison M.2001. “The Peer Group as a Context for the Development of Young Adolescent Motivation and Achievement”. Child Development72:1135–50.
35.
ShrumWesleyCheekNeil H.. 1987. “Social Structure during the School Years: Onset of the Degrouping Process”. American Sociological Review52:218–23.
36.
ShrumWesleyCheekNeil H.HunterSaundra M.. 1988. “Friendship in School: Gender and Racial Homophily”. Sociology of Education61:227–39.
37.
SimmelGeorg. 1922/1955. “The Web of Group-Affiliations.” Pp. 127–95 in Conflict and the Web of Group Affiliations, translated by WolffKurt H.BendixReinhard. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
38.
SingletonRoyce A.StraitsBruce C.. 1999. Approaches to Social Research (3rd ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
39.
StorkDianaRichardsWilliam D.. 1992. “Nonrespondents in Communication Network Studies: Problems and Possibilities”. Group and Organization Management17:193–209.
40.
UrbergKathyrn A.DegirmenciogluSerdarTolsonJerry M.Halliday-ScherKathy. 1995. “The Structure of Adolescent Peer Networks”. Developmental Psychology31:540–47.
41.
WassermanStanleyFaustKatherine. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
42.
WellmanBarry. 1988. “Structural Analysis: From Method and Metaphor to Theory and Substance”. Pp. 19–61 in Social Structures: A Network Approach, edited by WellmanBarryBerkowitzS. D.. New York: Cambridge University Press.
43.
XieHonglingCairnsRobert B.CairnsBeverley D.. 2002. “The Development of Social Aggression and Physical Aggression: A Narrative Analysis of Interpersonal Conflicts”. Aggressive Behavior28:341–55.
44.
XieHonglingFarmerThomas W.CairnsBeverley D.. 2003. “Different Forms of Aggression among Inner-City African-American Children: Gender, Configurations and School Social Networks”. Journal of School Psychology41:355–75.
45.
XieHonglingSwiftDylan J.CairnsBeverley D.CairnsRobert B.. 2002. “Aggressive Behaviors in Social Interaction and Developmental Adaptation: A Narrative Analysis of Interpersonal Conflicts During Early Adolescence”. Social Development11:205–24.
46.
ZakriskiAudrey L.ColeJohn D.. 1996. A Comparison of Aggressive-Rejected and Nonaggressive-Rejected Children's Interpretations of Self-Directed and Other-Directed Rejection. Child Development67:1048–70.
