This paper sets out to determine whether proximity constraints are more significant in new forms of production organisation in the automotive industry. An analysis is made of the extent to which new organisational technologies condition the internationalisation strategies of firms, with particular reference to whether geographical proximity requirements may condition the development of the automotive industry in the institutional and productive context of an intermediate region (such as the Basque Country) at risk from potential relocation towards central and eastern European countries (CEECs). The results derived from field work indicate that proximity constraints are not significant in the organisational configuration of the Basque automotive industry except in highly specific cases, thanks to the availability of solutions such as temporary agglomerations, new communication technologies and logistical systems.
References
1.
ACICAE (Cluster Group of Automotive Component Industries of the Basque Country) (2008) Data from the industry. Zamudio, Vizcaya.
2.
Aláez, R., Bilbao, J., Camino, V. and Longás, J.C. ( 2008) Technology and inter-firm relationships in the automotive industry, International Journal of Technology Management, 42(3), pp. 267-289.
3.
Amendola, M. and Gaffard, J.L. (1988) La dynamique économique de l’innovation. Paris: Economica.
4.
Aydalot, P. (1985) Economie regional et urbaine. Paris: Economica.
5.
Barnes, J. and Kaplinsky, R. ( 2000) Globalization and the death of the local firm? The automobile components sector in South Africa, Regional Studies, 34(9), pp. 797-812.
6.
Becattini, G. ( 1992) Italia, in: F. Pyke , G. Becattini and W. Sengenberger (Eds) Los distritos industriales y las pequeñas empresas II: El resurgimiento de la pequeña empresa . Ministerio de Trabajo y Seguridad Social [Spanish Ministry of Labour and Social Security], Madrid.
7.
Brown, R. ( 2000) Clusters, supply chains and local embeddedness in Fyrstad , European Urban and Regional Studies, 7(4), pp. 291-306.
8.
Brüllart, M., Cozet, M. and Koenig, P. ( 2004) Enlargement and the EU periphery: the impact of changing market potential, The World Economy, 27, pp. 853-875.
9.
Camagni, R. ( 1992) Empirical Identification of Innovative Milieux in European Lagging Regions. Paris: GREMI.
10.
Cantwell, J. and Piscitello, L. ( 2005) Recent location of foreign-owned research and development activities by large multinational corporations in the European regions: the role of spillovers and externalities, Regional Studies, 39(1), pp. 1-16.
11.
Carrillo, J. ( 2004) Transnational strategies and regional development: the case of GM and Delphi in Mexico, Industry and Innovation, 11(1/2), pp. 127-153.
12.
Carrincazeaux, C. and Lung, Y. ( 1997) La proximité dans l’organisation de la conception des produits de l’automobile, Actes du Gerpisa, 19, pp. 49-67.
13.
Dicken, P. ( 2003) Global Shift: Reshaping the Global Economy Map in the 21st Century, 4th edn. London : Sage.
14.
Dubin, R. and Helper, S. ( 1998) In search of agglomeration economies: the adoption of technological innovations in the automobile industry, in: M. Steiner (Ed.) Clusters and Regional Specialisation: On Geography, Technology, and Networks, ch. 8. London: Pion.
15.
Dunning, J.H. and Narula, R. ( 2004) Multinationals and Industrial Competitiveness: A New Agenda . Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
16.
Freyssenet, M., Shimizu, K. and Volpato, G. (Eds) ( 2003) Globalization or Regionalization of the European Car Industry?London: Palgrave.
17.
Galán, J.I. and González-Benito, J. ( 2001) Factores explicativos de la inversión directa española en el exterior, Información Comercial Española , 794, pp. 103-122.
18.
Garel Rhys, D. ( 2004), The motor industry in an enlarged EU, The World Economy, 27(6), pp. 877-900.
19.
Garofoli, G. ( 2002) Local development in Europe: theoretical models and international comparisons, European Urban and Regional Studies, 9(3), pp. 225-240.
20.
Head, K., Mayer, T. and Ries, J. ( 2002) On the pervasiveness of home market effects, Economica, 69, pp. 371-390.
21.
Johanson, J. and Mattsson, L.-G. ( 1987) Interorganisational relations in industrial systems: a network approach compared with the transaction-cost approach, International Studies of Management and Organisation, 17(1), pp. 34-48.
22.
Kamp, B. ( 2003) Formation and Evolution of International Business Networks . Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers .
23.
Kirat, T. and Lung, Y. ( 1999) Innovation and proximities: territories as a loci of collective learning processess, European Urban and Regional Studies, 6(1), pp. 27-38.
24.
Klepper, S. ( 2002) The capabilities of new firms and the evolution of the US automobile industry, Industrial and Corporate Change, 11, pp. 645-666.
25.
Klier, T.H. ( 1999) Agglomeration in the U.S. auto supplier industry, Economic Perspectives, 23(1), pp. 18-34.
26.
Langlois, R.N. and Robertson, P.L. ( 1995) Firms, Markets and Economic Change: A Dynamic Theory of Business Institutions. London: Routledge.
27.
Lundvall, B.-A. ( 1999) Spatial division of labour and interactive learning, Revue d’Économie Régionale et Urbaine, 3, pp. 469-488.
28.
Lung, Y. ( 2001) La coordinación de competencias y conocimientos: un reto crítico para los sistemas regionales del automóvil, Sociología del Trabajo, NS, 41, pp. 47-73.
29.
Lung, Y. and Mair, A. ( 1993) Innovation institutionnelle, apprentissage organisationnel et contrainte de proximités: les enseignements de la géographie du Juste-à-temps, Revue d’Économie Régionale et Urbaine, 3, pp. 387-403.
30.
Mair, A., Florida, R. and Kenney, M. ( 1988) The new geography of automobile production: Japanese transplants in North America, Economic Geography, 64(4), pp. 352-373.
31.
Pavlínek, P. and Janák, L. ( 2007) Regional restructuring of the Skoda auto supplier network in the Czech Republic, European Urban and Regional Studies , 14(2), pp. 133-156.
32.
Pecqueur, B. (1989) Le développment local: mode ou modèle. Paris : Syros.
33.
Pflüger, M. and Südekum, J. ( 2008) A synthesis of footloose-entrepreneur new economic geography models: when is agglomeration smooth and easily reversible?, Journal of Economic Geography, 8, pp. 39-54.
34.
Ponds, R., Oort, F.-G. van and Frenken, K. ( 2007) The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration, Papers in Regional Science, 86(3), pp. 423-443.
35.
Rallet, A. ( 1993) Choix de proximité et processus d’innovation technologique, Revue d’Economie Régionale et Urbaine, 3, pp. 365-383.
36.
Richardson, G.B. ( 1972) The organisation of industry, Economic Journal, 82, pp. 883-896.
37.
Sadler, D. ( 1994) The geographies of Just-in-time: Japanese investment and the automobile component industry in Western Europe, Economic Geography, 70(1), pp. 41-59.
38.
Sadler, D. ( 1998) Changing inter-firm relations in the European automotive industry: increased dependence or enhanced autonomy for components producers? , European Urban and Regional Studies, 5(4), pp. 317-328.
39.
Sadler, D. ( 1999) Internationalization and specialization in the European automotive components sector: implications for the hollowing-out thesis, Regional Studies, 33(2), pp. 109-119.
40.
Sternberg, R. and Arndt, O. ( 2001) The firm or the region: what determines the innovation behavior of European firms?Economic Geography, 77(4), pp. 364-382.
41.
Storper, M. ( 1998) Economías regionales como activos relacionales , Ekonomiaz-Revista vasca de economía, 41, pp. 10-45.
42.
Torre, A. and Rallet, A. ( 2005) Proximity and localization, Regional Studies , 39(1), pp. 47-60.
43.
Vieyra, A. ( 2003) El sector automotriz y el proceso de industrialización en México: aspectos históricoeconómicos de su conformación territorial, in: J. L. García Ruiz (Ed.) Sobre Ruedas: Una Historia Crítica de la Industria del Automóvil en España, pp. 213-238. Madrid: Editorial Síntesis.
44.
Williamson, O. ( 1975) Market and Hierarchies. New York: The Free Press.
