Power-control theory states that relative power in the workplace conditions patterns of parental control of children in two-parent families, resulting in gender differences in rates of nonserious delinquency. Additionally, single mothers, regardless of their occupational power, control and socialize their sons and daughters similarly and effect a small delinquency gender gap. In the present study, the authors applied the traditional power-control theory and an extended power-control theory to two data sets on single-mother families to empirically test these assertions. As predicted by power-control theory, they found no gender difference in delinquency once the relevant variables were controlled for in the analysis. Consistent with the extended revise model, however, delinquent offending increased for females who associate with delinquent peers. This relationship also appears to be conditioned by structural factors.
References
1.
Agnew, R. (1991). The interactive effects of peer variables on delinquency. Criminology, 29, 47-72.
2.
Akers, R. (1989). A social behaviorists' perspective on integration of theories of crime and deviance. In S. Messner, M. Krohn, & A. Liska (Eds.), Theoretical integration in the study of deviance and crime: Problems and prospects (pp. 23-36). Albany: State University of New York Press.
3.
Amato, P. R. (1987). Family processes in one-parent, stepparent, and intact families: The child's point of view. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 327-337.
4.
Bernard, T. (1990). Twenty years of testing theories: What have we learned and why?Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 27, 325-347.
5.
Cernkovich, S. , & Giordano, P. (1987). Family relationships and delinquency. Criminology, 25, 295-321.
6.
Chodorow, N. (1978). The reproduction of mothering: Psychoanalysis and the sociology of gender. Berkeley: University of California Press.
7.
Conger, R. (1976). Social control and social learning models of delinquency: A synthesis. Criminology, 14, 17-40.
8.
Dahrendorf, R. (1959). Class and class conflict in industrial society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
9.
Dornbusch, S. , Carlsmith, J., Bushwall, S., Ritter, P., Leiderman, H., Hastorf, A., & Gross, R. (1985). Single parents, extended households, and the control of adolescents. Child development, 56, 326-341.
10.
Elliott, D. (1994). Serious violent offenders—Onset, developmental course, and termination: The American Society of Criminology 1993 presidential address. Criminology, 32, 1-21.
11.
Elliott, D. , Huizinga, D., & Ageton, S. (1985). Explaining delinquency and drug use. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
12.
Farnworth, M. (1984). Family structure, family attributes, and delinquency in a sample of low-income, minority males and females. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 13, 349-364.
13.
Farnworth, M. (1989). Theory integration versus model building. In S. Messner, M. Krohn, & A. Liska (Eds.), Theoretical integration in the study of deviance and crime: Problems and prospects (pp. 93-100). Albany: State University of New York Press.
14.
Farnworth, M. , & Leiber, M. (1989). Strain theory revisited: Economic goals, educational means, and delinquency. American Sociological Review, 54, 263-274.
15.
Farnworth, M. , Thornberry, T., Krohn, M., & Lizotte, A. (1994). Measurement in the study of class and delinquency: Integrating theory and research. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 31, 32-61.
16.
Furstenberg, F. , & Cherlin, A. (1991). Divided families: What happens to children when parents part. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17.
Free, M. (1991). Clarifying the relationship between the broken home and juvenile delinquency: A critique of the current literature. Deviant Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 109-167.
18.
Giordano, P. , Cernkovich, S., & Pugh, M. (1986). Friendships and delinquency. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 1170-1202.
19.
Glueck, S. , & Glueck, E. (1950). Unraveling juvenile delinquency. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20.
Glueck, S. , & Glueck, E. (1968). Delinquents and nondelinquents in perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
Gove, W. , & Crutchfield, R. (1982). The family and juvenile delinquency. Sociological Quarterly, 23, 301-319.
22.
Grasmick, H. , Sims Blackwell, B., & Bursik, R. (1993). Changes in the sex patterning of perceived threats of sanctions. Law and Society, 27, 679-705.
23.
Greenberg, D. (1977). Delinquency and the age structure. Contemporary Crises, 1, 189-223.
24.
Hagan, J. (1989). Structural criminology. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
25.
Hagan, J. , Gillis, A., & Simpson, J. (1985). The class structure of gender and delinquency: Toward a power-control theory of common delinquent behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 90, 1151-1178.
26.
Hagan, J. , Gillis, A., & Simpson, J., (1990). Clarifying and extending power-control theory. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 1024-1037.
27.
Hagan, J. , Simpson, J., & Gillis, A. (1987). Class in the household: A power-control theory of gender and delinquency. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 788-816.
28.
Hill, G. , & Atkinson, M. (1988). Gender, familial control, and delinquency. Criminology, 26, 127-149.
29.
Hindelang, M. , Hirschi, T., & Weis, J. (1981). Measuring delinquency. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
30.
Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
31.
Hirschi, T. (1979). Separate and unequal is better. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 16, 34-38.
32.
Jensen, G. , & Thompson, K. (1990). What's class got to do with it? A further examination of power-control theory. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 1009-1023.
33.
Konopka, G. (1966). The adolescent girl in conflict. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
34.
LaGrange, R. , & White, H. (1985). Age differences in delinquency: A test of theory. Criminology, 23, 19-45.
35.
Leiber, M. (1993). The disproportionate overrepresentation of minority youth in secure facilities: A survey of decision-makers and delinquents. Report prepared for the Office of Criminal and Juvenile Justice Planning, Des Moines, Iowa, in cooperation with the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
36.
Leiber, M. , Farnworth, M., Jamieson, K., & Nalla, M. (1994). Bridging the gender gap in criminology: Liberation and gender-specific strain effects on delinquency. Sociological Inquiry, 64, 56-68.
37.
Leonard, E. (1982). Women, crime, and society. New York: Longman.
38.
Little, C. (1989). Strategies for cross-level theorizing: Comments on the Meier and Hagan papers. In S. Messner, M. Krohn, & A. Liska (Eds.), Theoretical integration in the study of deviance and crime: Problems and prospects (pp. 229-240). Albany: State University of New York Press.
39.
Monahan, T. (1957). Family status and the delinquent child: A reappraisal and some new findings. Social Forces, 35, 250-258.
40.
Morash, M. , & Chesney-Lind, M. (1991). A reformulation and partial test of the power control theory of delinquency. Justice Quarterly, 8, 347-377.
41.
Morris, R. (1964). Female delinquency and relational problems. Social Forces, 49, 83-89.
42.
Nye, F. I. (1958). Family relationships and delinquent behavior. New York: John Wiley.
43.
Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific inquiry. New York: Harper & Row.
44.
Rankin, J. , & Wells, L. E. (1990). The effect of parental attachments and direct controls on delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 27, 140-165.
45.
Rosen, L. (1970). The broken home and male delinquency. In M. Wolfgang, L. Savitz, & N. Johnson (Eds.), The sociology of crime and delinquency. New York: John Wiley.
46.
Sampson, R. , & Laub, J. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47.
Singer, S. , & Levine, M. (1988). Power-control theory, gender, and delinquency: A partial replication with additional evidence on the effects of peers. Criminology, 26, 627-647.
48.
Smith, D. , & Paternoster, R. (1987). The gender gap in theories of deviance: Issues and evidence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 24, 140-172.
49.
Steinberg, L. (1987). Single parents, stepparents, and the susceptibility of adolescents to antisocial peer pressure. Child Development, 58, 269-275.
50.
Thomson, E. , McLanahan, S., & Curtin, R. (1992). Family structure, gender, and parental socialization. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 368-378.
51.
Thornberry, T. (1987). Toward an interactional theory of delinquency. Criminology, 25, 863-891.
52.
Tittle, C. , & Meier, R. (1990). Specifying the SES/delinquency relationship. Criminology, 28, 271.
53.
Van Voorthis, P. , Cullen, F., Mathers, R., & Garner, C. (1988). The impact of family structure and quality on delinquency: A comparative assessment of structural and functional factors. Criminology, 26, 235-261.
54.
Wagner, D. , & Berger, J. (1985). Do sociological theories grow?American Journal of Sociology, 90, 697-728.
55.
Wells, L. , & Rankin, J. (1985). Broken homes and juvenile delinquency: An empirical review. Criminal Justice Abstracts, 17, 249-272.
56.
Wells, L. , & Rankin, J. (1988). Direct parental controls and delinquency. Criminology, 26, 263-285.
