The Psychological Effects of Solitary Confinement: An Early Instance of Psychology in South African Courts

Abstract

Solitary confinement has a long and appalling history in South Africa, since its introduction in the 1950s. The general history of the relationship between psychology and law in this country tends to overlook the way in which solitary confinement under the so-called 90-day Act provided an early instance of psychological expertise being called upon in legal trials. Two psychologists in particular, Ronald Albino at the University of Natal and Kurt Danziger at the University of Cape Town, became embroiled as expert witnesses in political trials about the psychological effects of solitary confinement on detainees under security legislation. Albino's work has been published (to some extent), but very little is known about the testimony of Danziger, and its effects. This article discusses the evidence that Danziger gave in the trial of Cape Town academic Neville Alexander, and its place in the history of forensic psychology in this country.

Keywords

expert witnesses forensic psychology history history of psychology law solitary confinement

References

Allan

(2005). The psychologist as expert witness. In Tredoux

Foster

Allan

Cohen

Wassenaar

(Eds.), Psychology and law (pp. 287–320). Cape Town: Juta

American Psychological Association. (2004). American Psychologist, 59(6) Special issue

Australian commie? (1964, June 24). Varsity.

Ban solitary confinement. (1963, December 17). Cape Times, p. 1

Bartol

C. R.

Bartol

A. M.

(1999). History of forensic psychology. In Hess

A. K.

Weiner

I. B.

(Eds.), The handbook of forensic psychology (2nd ed) (pp. 3–23). New York: Wiley

Danziger

(November 12, 1963). How solitary confinement affects prisoners.Cape Times, p. 12

Danziger

(May, 1964). Solitary confinement.Forum, pp. 2–3

Danziger

(1976). Interpersonal communication. New York: Pergamon

Fine

(1984). Re-examining the validity of detainee evidence: A psycho-legal approach. South African Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 8, 156–194

10.

Foster

(1990). Expert testimony on collective violence. In Hansson

van Zyl Smit

(Eds.), Towards justice? Crime and state control in South Africa (pp. 154–172). Cape Town: Oxford University Press

11.

Foster

Davis

Sandler

(1987). Detention and torture in South Africa. London: James Currey

12.

Frankel

(1999). Rivonia's children. Johannesburg: Jonathan Ball

13.

Grisso

(1991). A developmental history of the American Psychology-Law Society. Law and Human Behaviour, 15, 213–231

14.

Haney

(2003). Mental health issues in long-term solitary and ‘Supermax’ confinement. Crime & Delinquency, 49, 124–156

15.

Hess

A. K.

Weiner

I. B.

(1999). The handbook of forensic psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley

16.

Jackson

J. P.

(1998). Creating a consensus: Psychologists, the Supreme Court, and school desegregation, 1952–1955. Journal of Social Issues, 54, 143–177

17.

Jackson

J. P.

(2000). The triumph of the segregationists? A historiographical inquiry into psychology and the Brown Litigation. History of Psychology, 3, 239–261

18.

Louw

D. A.

Allan

(1996). Forensic psychology in South Africa. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 14, 49–61

19.

Mathews

A. S.

Albino

(1966). The permanence of the temporary: An examination of the 90- and 180-day detention laws. South African Law Journal, 83, 16–43

20.

Roesch

Hart

S. D.

Ogloff

J. R. P.

(Eds.) (1999). Psychology and law: The state of the discipline (Vol. 10). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum

21.

Roux

A. S.

(1967). Sensory and perceptual deprivation. The South African Psychologist, 69, 1–16

22.

State v. Alexander and Others, 1 SA. 249 (1964)

23.

State v. Alexander and Others, 2 SA. 796 (1965a)

24.

State v. Alexander and Others, 2 SA. 818 (1965b)

25.

Tredoux

Foster

Allan

Cohen

Wassenaar

(Eds.) (2005). Psychology and law. Cape Town: Juta

26.

Zubek

J. P.

(1964). Effect of prolonged sensory and perceptual deprivation. British Medical Bulletin, 20, 38–42