This study explores how innovations surrounding supply chain communication systems (SCCS) affect channel relationships and market performance. Drawing on the resource-based view of the firm, the study hypothesizes that certain SCCS innovations can be viewed as firm resources that enhance channel capabilities, which in turn affect a firm's market performance. The empirical research is based on 184 responses from a survey with U.S. supply chain and logistics managers using structural equation modeling as the analytic method. The results suggest that the effect of applied technological SCCS innovations on channel capabilities is mediated by interfirm systems integration. In contrast, administrative SCCS innovations enhance information exchange and coordination activities directly. Furthermore, the influence of applied technological innovations for SCCS is not strong enough to affect either responsiveness of the partnership or firm performance, whereas administrative innovations for SCCS affect both.
Anderson, Helen, Virpi Havila, and Asta Salmi. 2001. “Can You Buy a Business Relationship? On the Importance of Customer and Supplier Relationships in Acquisitions.”Industrial Marketing Management30 (7): 575-586.
2.
Anderson, James C. and David W. Gerbing. 1988. “Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach.”Psychological Bulletin103 (3): 411-423.
3.
Bagozzi, Richard P., Youjae Yi, and Lynn W. Phillips. 1991. “Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research.”Administrative Science Quarterly36 (3): 421-458.
4.
Barney, Jay. 1991. “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage.”Journal of Management17 (1): 99-120.
5.
Bello, Daniel C. and David I. Gilliland. 1997. “The Effect of Output Controls, Process Controls, and Flexibility on Export Channel Performance.”Journal of Marketing61 (1): 22-38.
6.
Bowersox, Donald J., David J. Closs, and M. Bixby Cooper. 2002.Supply Chain Logistics Management. New York: McGraw-Hill.
7.
Bowersox, Donald J., David J. Closs, and M. Bixby Cooper, and Theodore P. Stank. 1999.21st Century Logistics: Making Supply Chain Integration a Reality. East Lansing: Michigan State University and Council of Logistics Management.
8.
Brynjolfsson, Erik. 1993. “The Productivity Paradox of Information Technology.”Communications of the ACM36 (12): 67-77.
9.
Brynjolfsson, Erik. and Lorin Hitt. 1996. “Paradox Lost? Firm-Level Evidence on the Returns to Information Systems Spending.”Management Science42 (4): 541-558.
10.
Churchill, Gilbert A., Jr.1979. “A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs.”Journal of Marketing Research16 (1): 64-73.
11.
Clemons, Eric K. and Michael C. Row. 1992. “Information Technology and Industrial Cooperation: The Changing Economics of Coordination and Ownership.”Journal of Management Information Systems9 (2): 9-28.
12.
Clemons, Eric K. and Michael C. Row. 1993. “Limits to Interfirm Coordination Through Information Technology: Results of a Field Study in Consumer Packaged Goods Distribution.”Journal of Management Information Systems10 (1): 73-95.
13.
Closs, David J. and Katrina Savitskie. 2003. “Internal and External Logistics Information Technology Integration.”International Journal of Logistics Management14 (1): 63-76.
14.
Collis, David J.1994. “Research Note: How Valuable Are Organizational Capabilities?”Strategic Management Journal15 (Special Issue): 143-152.
15.
Cote, Joseph A. and M. Ronald Buckley. 1987. “Estimating Trait, Method, and Error Variance: Generalizing Across 70 Construct Validation Studies.”Journal of Marketing Research24 (3): 315-318.
16.
DiMaggio, Paul J. and Walter W. Powell. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited—Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.”American Sociological Review48 (2): 147-160.
17.
Esper, Terry L. and Lisa R. Williams. 2003. “The Value of Collaborative Transportation Management (CTM): Its Relationship to CPFR and Information Technology.”Transportation Journal42 (4): 55-65.
18.
Fornell, Claes and David F. Larcker. 1981. “Evaluating Structural Equation Models With Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error.”Journal of Marketing Research18 (1): 39-50.
19.
Gatignon, Hubert and Jean-Marc Xuereb. 1997. “Strategic Orientation of the Firm and New Product Performance.”Journal of Marketing Research34 (1): 77-90.
20.
Grant, Robert M.1996. “Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm.”Strategic Management Journal17 (Winter Special Issue): 109-122.
21.
Hernandez-Espallardo, Miguel and Narciso Arcas-Lario. 2003. “The Effects of Authoritative Mechanisms of Coordination on Market Orientation in Asymmetrical Channel Partnerships.”International Journal of Research in Marketing20 (2): 133-152.
22.
Kettinger, William J., Varun Grover, Subashish Guha, and Albert H. Segars. 1994. “Strategic Information Systems Revisited: A Study in Sustainability and Performance.”MIS Quarterly18 (1): 31-58.
23.
Lee, Dong-Jin, M. Joseph Sirgy, James R. Brown, and Monroe Murphy Bird. 2004. “Importers' Benevolence Toward Their Foreign Export Suppliers.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science32 (1): 32-48.
24.
Lewis, Ira. 2001. “Logistics and Electronic Commerce: An Interorganizational Systems Perspective.”Transportation Journal40 (4): 5-13.
25.
Lewis, Ira. and Alexander Talalayevsky. 1997. “Logistics and Information Technology: A Coordination Perspective.”Journal of Business Logistics18 (1): 141-156.
26.
Malone, Thomas W., Joanne Yates, and Robert I. Benjamin. 1987. “ Electronic Markets and Electronic Hierarchies.”Communications of the ACM30 (6): 484-497.
27.
McGinnis, Michael A. and Jonathan W. Kohn. 1993. “Logistics Strategy, Organizational Environment, and Time Competitiveness.”Journal of Business Logistics14 (2): 1-23.
28.
Mohr, Jakki and John R. Nevin. 1990. “Communication Strategies in Marketing Channels: A Theoretical Perspective.”Journal of Marketing54 (4): 36-51.
29.
Mohr, Jakki and John R. Nevin. and Ravipreet S. Sohi. 1995. “Communication Flows in Distribution Channels: Impact on Assessments of Communication Quality and Satisfaction.”Journal of Retailing71 (4): 393-416.
30.
Morgan, Robert M. and Shelby D. Hunt. 1994. “The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing.”Journal of Marketing58 (3): 20-38.
31.
Mukhopadhyay, Tridas, Surendra Rajiv, and Kannan Srinivasan. 1997. “Information Technology Impact on Process Output and Quality.”Management Science43 (12): 1645-1659.
32.
Porter, Michael E. and Victor E. Millar. 1985. “How Information Gives You Competitive Advantage.”Harvard Business Review63 (4): 149-160.
33.
Powell, Thomas C. and Anne Dent-Micallef. 1997. “Information Technology as Competitive Advantage: The Role of Human, Business, and Technology Resources.”Strategic Management Journal18 (5): 375-405.
34.
Roberts, Bob and Mike Mackay. 1998. “IT Supporting Supplier Relationships: The Role of Electronic Commerce.”European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management4 (2/3): 175-184.
35.
Rogers, Dale S., Patricia J. Daugherty, and Theodore P. Stank. 1993. “ Enhancing Service Responsiveness: The Strategic Potential of EDI.”Logistics Information Management6 (3): 27-32.
36.
Sarkar, MB, Raj Echambadi, and Jeffrey S. Harrison. 2001. “Alliance Entrepreneurship and Firm Market Performance.”Strategic Management Journal22 (6/7): 701-711.
37.
Stank, Theodore, Michael Crum, and Miren Arango. 1999. “Benefits of Interfirm Coordination in Food Industry Supply Chains.”Journal of Business Logistics20 (2): 21-41.
38.
Swanson, E. Burton. 1994. “Information Systems Innovation Among Organizations.”Management Science40 (9): 1069-1092.
39.
Swanson, E. Burton. and Neil C. Ramiller. 1997. “The Organizing Vision in Information Systems Innovation.”Organization Science8 (5): 458-474.
40.
Taylor, David A.2003. “Supply Chain vs. Supply Chain.”Computerworld37 (November 10): 44-45.
41.
Truman, Gregory E.2000. “Integration in Electronic Exchange Environments.”Journal of Management Information Systems17 (1): 209-244.
