Conflicting results in the involvement literature arise from differences in the definitions and operationalizations applied to the term. This study argues that the construct should be treated as encompassing a number of related concepts and should be broken into its component forms. Two of these components, attention and perceptions of message relevance, were manipulated in an experiment designed to assess the impact of a message on heart disease risk reduction. Results indicate that attention to the message had primarily cognitive effects, leading to greater message recall, whereas perceptions of relevance influenced attitudes and behavior.
References
1.
Batra, R.
, & Ray, M. (1983). Operationalizing involvement as depth and quality of cognitive response. In R. Bagozzi & A. Tybout (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 10, pp. 309-313). Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.
2.
Batra, R.
, & Ray, M. (1985). How advertising works at contact. In L. Alwitt & A. Mitchell (Eds.), Psychological processes and advertising effects: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 13-43). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
Buller, D.
(1986). Distraction during persuasive communication: A meta-analytic review. Communication Monographs, 53, 91-114.
4.
Cardillo, B. (1983). The relationship between involvement, mass media habits, and health information seeking. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, CA.
5.
Chaffee, S.
, & Roser, C. (1986). Involvement and the consistency of knowledge, attitudes, and behavior. Communication Research, 13, 373-400.
6.
Chaffee, S.
, & Schleuder, J. (1986). Measurement and effects of attention to media news. Human Communication Research, 13, 76-107.
7.
Cohen, J.
(1983). Involvement and you: 1000 great ideas. In R. Bagozzi & A. Tybout (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 10, pp. 325-328). Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.
8.
Dunwoody, S.
, & Neuwirth, K. (1988, July). The impact of information on AIDS judgments and behavioral change among young adults. Paper presented to the Communication Theory and Methodology Division of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Portland, OR.
9.
Festinger, L.
, & Maccoby, N. (1964). On resistance to persuasive communications. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68, 359-366.
10.
Freedman, J.
, & Sears, D. (1965). Warning, distraction, and resistance to influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 262-265.
11.
Grunig, J.
(1978). Defining publics in public relations: The case of a suburban hospital. Journalism Quarterly, 55, 109-118.
12.
Grunig, J.
(1982). The message-attitude-behavior relationship: Communication behaviors of organizations. Communication Research, 9, 163-200.
13.
Grunig, J.
, & Childers, L. (1988, July). Reconstruction of a situational theory of communication: Internal and external concepts as identifiers of publics for AIDS. Paper presented to the Communication Theory and Methodology Division of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Portland, OR.
14.
Gunther, A.
(1988). Attitude extremity and trust in media. Journalism Quarterly, 65, 279-287.
15.
Houston, M.
, & Rothschild, M. (1978). Conceptual and methodological perspectives on involvement. In S. Jain (Ed.), Research frontiers in marketing: Dialogues and directions (pp. 184-187). Chicago: American Marketing Association.
16.
Hovland, C.
, Janis, I., & Kelley, J. (1953). Communication and persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
17.
Janis, I.
, & Feshbach, S. (1953). Effects of fear-arousing communications. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48, 78-92.
18.
Jöreskog, K.
, & Sörbom, D. (1984). LISREL VI: Analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.
19.
Krugman, H.
(1965). The impact of television advertising: Learning without involvement. Public Opinion Quarterly, 29, 349-356.
20.
Levy, M.
, & Windahl, S. (1984). Audience activity and gratifications: A conceptual clarification and exploration. Communication Research, 11, 51-78.
21.
McGuire, W.
(1968). Personality and susceptibility to social influence. In E. Borgatta & W. Lambert (Eds.), Handbook of personality theory and research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
22.
McGuire, W.
(1989). Theoretical foundations of campaigns. In R. Rice & C. Atkin (Eds.), Public communication campaigns (pp. 43-65). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23.
McLeod, J.
, & McDonald, D. (1985). Beyond simple exposure: Media orientations and their impact on political processes. Communication Research, 12, 3-34.
24.
Mitchell, A.
(1979). Involvement: A potentially important mediator of consumer behavior. In W. Wilkie (Ed.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 6, pp. 191-196). Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.
25.
Mulder, R.
(1979). The effects of televised political ads in the 1975 Chicago mayoral election. Journalism Quarterly, 56, 336-340.
26.
Osterhouse, R.
, & Brock, T. (1970). Distraction increases yielding to propaganda by inhibiting counterarguing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 344-358.
27.
Pavlik, J.
, with Finnegan, J., Jacobs, D., Strickland, D., & Viswanath, K. (1987, August). Campaign planning in public relations: Learning from the Minnesota Heart Health Program. Paper presented to the Public Relations Division of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, San Antonio, TX.
28.
Perloff, R.
(1985). Personal relevance and campaign information seeking: A cognitive response-based approach. In S. Kraus & R. Perloff (Eds.), Mass media and political thought: An information-processing approach (pp. 177-200). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
29.
Perse, E.
(1988, May). A conceptualization and test of media involvement. Paper presented to the Mass Communication Division of the International Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.
30.
Petty, R.
, & Cacioppo, J. (1979). Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1915-1926.
31.
Petty, R.
, & Cacioppo, J. (1984). The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 69-81.
32.
Petty, R.
, & Cacioppo, J. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
33.
Petty, R.
, Cacioppo, J., & Goldman, R. (1981). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 847-855.
34.
Petty, R.
, Cacioppo, J., & Heesacker, M. (1981). Effects of rhetorical questions on persuasion: A cognitive response analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 432-440.
35.
Petty, R.
, Ostrom, T., & Brock, T. (Eds.). (1981). Cognitive responses in persuasion. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36.
Petty, R.
, Wells, G. L., & Brock, T. (1976). Distraction can enhance or reduce yielding to propaganda: Thought disruption versus effort justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 874-884.
37.
Ray, M.
, with Sawyer, A., Rothschild, M., Heeler, R., Strong, E., & Reed, J. (1973). Marketing communication and the hierarchy-of-effects. In P. Clarke (Ed.), New models for communication research (pp. 147-176). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
38.
Roberts, D.
, & Maccoby, N. (1973). Information processing and persuasion: Counterarguing behavior. In P. Clarke (Ed.), New models for mass communication research (pp. 269-307). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
39.
Rosenblatt, P.
(1966). Persuasion as a function of varying amounts of distraction. Psychonomic Science, 5, 85-86.
40.
Rothschild, M.
(1983). Perspectives on involvement: Current problems and future directions. In T. Kinnear (Ed.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 11, pp. 216-217). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
41.
Rothschild, M., & Ray, M. (1974). Involvement and political advertising effect: An exploratory experiment. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University, CA.
42.
Salmon, C. (1985). The role of involvement in health information acquisition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.
43.
Salmon, C.
(1986). Perspectives on involvement in consumer and communication research. In B. Dervin & M. Voigt (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences (pp. 243-269). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
44.
Sherif, C.
, & Sherif, M. (1967). Attitude, ego-involvement and change. New York: Wiley.
45.
Sherif, C.
, Sherif, M., & Nebergall, R. (1965). Attitude and attitude change: The social judgment-involvement approach. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.
46.
Sherif, M.
, & Cantril, H. (1947). The psychology of ego-involvements. New York: Wiley.
47.
Slovic, P.
, Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1981). Perceived risk: Psychological factors and social implications. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 376, 17-34.
48.
Tesser, A.
(1978). Self-generated attitude change. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 11). New York: Academic Press.
49.
Tesser, A.
, & Conlee, M. (1975). Some effects of time and thought on attitude polarization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 262-270.
50.
Tesser, A.
, & Leone, C. (1977). Cognitive schemas and thought as determinants of attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 340-356.
51.
Thorson, E.
, Salmon, C., & Nowak, G. (1988, July). Determinants of attitude change on issues of social significance. Paper presented to the Communication Theory and Methodology Division of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Portland, OR.
52.
Zimmer, T. A.
(1981). Media exposure to campaigns: Public anticipation and involvement in elections. Communication Research, 8, 189-204.
