Juvenile justice systems have widely adopted risk assessment instruments to support judicial and administrative decisions about sanctioning severity and restrictiveness of care. A little explored property of these instruments is the extent to which their predictive validity generalizes across gender. The article reports on a meta-analysis of risk assessment predictive validity with male and female offenders. Nineteen studies encompassing 20 unique samples met inclusion criteria. Findings indicated that predictive validity estimates are equivalent for male and female offenders and are consistent with results of other meta-analyses in the field. The findings also indicate that when gender differences are observed in individual studies, they provide evidence for gender biases in juvenile justice decision-making and case processing rather than for the ineffectiveness of risk assessment with female offenders.
*Baker, K., Jones, S., Roberts, C., & Merrington, S. (2003). The evaluation of the validity and reliability of the Youth Justice Board's assessment for young offenders: Findings from the first two years of ASSET. Oxford, UK: Centre for Criminological Research, University of Oxford.
3.
Bloom, B., Owen, B., Deschenes, E.P., & Rosenbaum, J. (2002). Moving toward justice for female juvenile offenders in the new millennium: Modeling gender-specific policies and programs. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 18, 37-56.
4.
Bonta, J. (1996). Risk-needs: Assessment and treatment. In A. T. Harland (Ed.), Choosing correctional options that work: Defining the demand and evaluating the supply (pp. 18-32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
Chesney-Lind, M., & Sheldon, R.G. (1998). Girls, delinquency, and juvenile justice (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: West/Wadsworth .
6.
Cottle, C.C., Lee, R.L., & Heilbrun, K. (2001). The prediction of criminal recidivism in juveniles: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 367-394.
7.
Dawes, R.M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P.E. (1989). Clinical vs. actuarial judgment. Science, 243, 1668-1674.
Ferguson, J.L. (2002). Putting the "what works" research into practice: An organizational perspective. Criminal Justice and Behavior , 29, 472-492.
10.
*Flores, A.W., Travis, L.F., & Latessa, E.J. (2004). Case classification for juvenile corrections: An assessment of the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (YLS/CMI), final report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
11.
Fraser, M.W., Kirby, L.D., & Smokowski, P.R. (2004). Risk and resilience in childhood. In M. W. Fraser (Ed.), Risk and resilience in childhood: An ecological perspective (2nd ed., pp. 13-66). Washington, DC : NASW Press.
12.
Funk, S.J. (1999). Risk assessment for juveniles on probation: A focus on gender. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26, 44-68.
13.
Gaarder, E., Rodriguez, N., & Zatz, M. (2004). Criers, liars, and manipulators: Probation officers' views of girls. Justice Quarterly, 21, 547-578.
14.
Gavazzi, S.M. (2006). Gender, ethnicity, and the family environment: Contributions to assessment efforts within the realm of juvenile justice. Family Relations, 55, 190-199.
15.
Gavazzi, S.M., Yarcheck, C.M., & Chesney-Lind, M. (2006). Global risk indicators and the role of gender in a juvenile detention sample. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33, 597-612.
16.
Goodkind, S. (2005). Gender-specific services in the juvenile justice system: A critical examination. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work, 20, 52-70.
17.
Goodkind, S., Ng, I., & Sarri, R.C. (2006). The impact of sexual abuse in the lives of young women involved or at risk of involvement with the juvenile justice system . Violence Against Women, 12, 456-477.
18.
Gottfredson, D. M., & Tonry, M. (Eds.). (1987). Prediction and classification: Criminal justice decision making. Chicago: The Chicago University Press.
19.
Griffin, P., & Bozynski, M. (2003). National overviews: State juvenile justice profiles . Retrieved November 5, 2003, from http://www.ncjj.org/stateprofiles/
20.
Grove, W.M., & Meehl, P.E. (1996). Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 293-323.
21.
Hall, S.M., & Brannick, M.T. (2002). Comparison of two random-effects methods of meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 28, 377-389.
22.
Hipwell, A.E., & Loeber, R. (2006). Do we know which interventions are effective for disruptive and delinquent girls? Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 9, 221-255.
23.
Hoge, R.D. (2002). Standardized instruments for assessing risk and need in youthful offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior , 29, 380-396.
24.
Hoge, R.D., & Andrews, D.A. (2003). The youth level of service/case management inventory (YCS/CMI): Intake manual and item scoring key. Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
25.
Howell, J.C. (1995). Guide for implementing the comprehensive strategy for serious, violent, and chronic juvenile offenders. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
Huff, D., & Prell, L. (n.d.). The proposed Iowa juvenile court intake risk assessment. Retrieved January 30, 2007, from http://www.state.ia.us/government/dhr/cjjp/images/pdf/before99/riskrpt6.pdf
28.
Hunter, J.E., & Schmidt, F. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
29.
Hunter, J.E., & Schmidt, F.L. (2000). Fixed effects vs. random effects meta-analysis models: Implications for cumulative research knowledge. International Journal of Selection and Research, 8, 275-292.
30.
*Ilacqua, G.E., Coulson, G.E., Lombardo, D., & Nutbrown, V. (1999). Predictive validity of the Young Offender Level of Service Inventory for criminal recidivism of male and female young offenders . Psychological Reports, 84, 1214-1218.
31.
*Johnson, K., Wagner, D., & Matthews, T. (2002). Missouri juvenile risk assessment revalidation report. Madison, WI: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
32.
*Jung, S., & Rawana, E.P. (1999). Risk and need assessment of juvenile offenders . Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26, 69-89.
33.
*Krysik, J., & LeCroy, C.W. (2002). The empirical validation of an instrument to predict risk of recidivism among juvenile offenders. Research on Social Work Practice, 12, 71-81.
34.
*LeCroy, C.W., Krysik, J., & Palumbo, D. (1998). Empirical validation of the Arizona risk/needs instrument and assessment process. Tucson, AZ: LeCroy & Milligan Associates.
35.
Leiber, M.J., & Mack, K.Y. (2003). The individual and joint effects of race, gender, and family status on juvenile justice decision-making. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40, 34-70.
36.
Lipsey, M.W. (2003). Those confounded moderators in meta-analysis: Good, bad, and ugly. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 587, 69-81.
37.
Lipsey, M.W., & Derzon, J.H. (1998). Predictors of violent or serious delinquency in adolescence and early adulthood. In R. L. D.P. Farrington (Ed.), Serious & violent juvenile offenders (pp. 86-105). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38.
MacDonald, J.M., & Chesney-Lind, M. (2001). Gender bias and juvenile justice revisited: A multiyear analysis. Crime and Delinquency , 47, 173-195.
39.
McGuire, M.D., & Kuhn, K.E. (2003). Gender and the likelihood of being securely detained for contempt. Juvenile & Family Court Journal, 54, 17-32.
40.
Mears, D.P., Ploeger, M., & Warr, M. (1998). Explaining the gender gap in delinquency: Peer influence and moral evaluations of behavior. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 35, 251-266.
41.
Miller, J., & Lin, J. (2007). Applying a generic juvenile risk assessment instrument to a local context: Some practical and theoretical lessons. Crime & Delinquency, 53, 552-580.
42.
*Nccd. (2000). Alameda County placement risk assessment validation: Draft of final report . Oakland, CA: Author.
43.
Odgers, C.L., Moretti, M.M., & Reppucci, N.D. (2005). Examining the science and practice of violence risk assessment with female adolescents. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 7-27.
44.
Piquero, N.L., Gover, A.R., MacDonald, J.M., & Piquero, A.R. (2005). The influence of delinquent peers on delinquency: Does gender matter? Youth & Society, 36, 251-275.
45.
*Putnins, A.L. (2005). Assessing recidivism risk among young offenders . Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 38, 324-339.
46.
Rice, M.E., & Harris, G.T. (1995). Violent recidivism: Assessing predictive validity . Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 737-748.
47.
Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
48.
Rosenthal, R., & DiMatteo, M.R. (2001). Meta-analysis: Recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 59-82.
49.
*Rowe, R.C. (2002). Predictors of criminal offending: Evaluating measures of risk/needs, psychopathy, and disruptive behaviour disorders. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
50.
SAS Institute, Inc. (2007). SAS 9.1. Cary, NC: Author.
51.
*Schmidt, F., Hoge, R.D., & Gomez, L. (2005). Reliability and Validity Analyses of the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32, 329-344.
52.
Schwalbe, C.S. (2007). A meta analysis of juvenile justice risk assessment predictive validity. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 449-462.
53.
*Schwalbe, C.S. (in press). Risk assessment stability: A revalidation study of the Arizona Risk/Needs Assessment Instrument. Research on Social Work Practice.
54.
*Schwalbe, C.S., Fraser, M.W., & Day, S.H. (2007). Predictive validity of the Joint Risk Matrix with juvenile offenders: A focus on gender and race/ethnicity. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 348-361.
55.
*Schwalbe, C.S., Fraser, M.W., Day, S.H., & Arnold, E.M. (2004). North Carolina Assessment of Risk (NCAR): Reliability and Predictive Validity with Juvenile Offenders. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 40, 1-22.
56.
Schafer, J.L. and Graham, J.W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art . Psychological Methods, 7, 147-177.
57.
*Schwalbe, C.S., Fraser, M.W., Day, S.H., & Cooley, V. (2006). Classifying juvenile offenders according to risk of recidivism: Predictive validity, race/ethnicity, and gender. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33, 305-324.
58.
Schwalbe, C.S., Hatcher, S.S., & Maschi, T.M. (in press). The effects of treatment needs and prior social services utilization on juvenile court decision making. Social Work Research.
59.
*Sharkey, J.D. (2003). Examining the relationship between risk and protective factors and juvenile recidivism for male and female probationers. Doctoral dissertation, University of California at Santa Barbara .
60.
*Sharkey, J.D., Furlong, M.J., Jimerson, S.R., & O'Brien, K.M. (2003). Evaluating the utility of a risk assessment to predict recidivism among male and female adolescents. Education and Treatment of Children, 26, 467-494.
61.
Simkins, S., & Katz, S. (2002). Criminalizing abused girls. Violence Against Women, 8, 1474-1499.
62.
Snyder, H.N., & Sickmund, M. (2006). Juvenile offenders and victims: 2006 National Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
63.
Steel, P.D., & Kammeyer-Mueller, J.D. (2002). Comparing meta-analytic moderator estimation techniques under realistic conditions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 96-111.
64.
Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Loeber, R., Homish, D.L., & Wei, E. (2001). Maltreatment of boys and the development of disruptive and delinquent behavior. Development and Psychopathology, 13, 941-955.
65.
*Thompson, A.P., & Pope, Z. (2005). Assessing juvenile offenders: Preliminary data for the Australian Adaptation of the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (Hoge & Andrews, 1995). Australian Psychologist , 40, 207-214.
66.
Towberman, D.B. (1992). A national survey of juvenile risk assessment . Family & Juvenile Court Journal, 43, 61-67.
67.
Wiebush, R.G. (2002). Graduated sanctions for juvenile offenders: A program model and planning guide. Reno, NV: Juvenile Sanctions Center: National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges .
68.
*Wiebush, R., Wagner, D., & Ehrlich, J. (1999). Development of an empirically-based risk assessment instrument: For the Virginia Department of Juvenile Justice final report. Madison, WI: National Council on Crime and Delinquency .
