This study evaluated the objective and predictive value of the Nebraska Department of Corrections' Inmate Classification Model, a variation of the Federal Prison System's Model. A sample of 458 male offenders was assessed on 11 predictor variables—5 classification variables and 6 demographic variables—and 5 institutional adjustment variables. The results indicated that the Nebraska model was making objective classification decisions based solely on the classification variables. However, the model was not a valid instrument for predicting the offenders' institutional adjustment problems. Age and education level—two variables not included in this model—emerged as the best predictors of adjustment. These findings suggest that the model's predictive value could be improved by incorporating valid predictor variables into the classification process.
References
1.
Afifi, A. A. , & Clark, V. (1990). Computer-aided multivariate analysis. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
2.
Austin, J. (1983). Assessing the new generation of prison classification models. Crime & Delinquency, 29, 561-577.
3.
Austin, J. (1986). Evaluating how well your classification system is operating: A practical approach. Crime & Delinquency, 32, 302-322.
4.
Baskin, D. R. , & Sommers, I. (1991). Assessing the impact of psychiatric impairment on prison violence. Journal of Criminal Justice, 19, 271-280.
5.
Buchanan, R. A. , & Whitlow, K. L. (1987). Guidelines for developing, implementing, and revising an objective prison classification system. (DGPO No. 89007970). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
6.
Buchanan, R. A. , Whitlow, K. L., & Austin, J. (1986). National evaluation of objective classification systems: The current state of the art. Crime & Delinquency, 32, 272-290.
7.
Carey, R. J. , Garske, J. P., & Ginsberg, J. (1986). The prediction of adjustment to prison by means of an MMPI-based classification system. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 13, 347-365.
8.
Clements, C. R. (1981). The future of offender classification: Some caution and prospects. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 8, 15-38.
9.
Clements, C. R. (1982). The relationship of offender classification to the problems of prison overcrowding. Crime & Delinquency, 28, 72-81.
10.
Cooper, R. P. , & Werner, P. D. (1990). Predicting violence in newly admitted inmates: A lens analysis of staff decision making. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 431-447.
11.
Ellis, D. , Grasmick, H. G., & Gilman, B. (1974). Violence in prisons: A sociological analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 80, 16-43.
12.
Hanson, R. W. , Moss, C. S., Hosford, R. E., & Johnson, M. E. (1983). Predicting inmate penitentiary adjustment: An assessment of four classificatory methods. Crime & Delinquency, 10, 293-309.
13.
Innes, C. A. (1987). Population density in state prisons. DGPO No. 87006429). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
14.
Judd, C. M. , & McClelland, G. H. (1989). Data analysis: A model comparison approach. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
15.
Kane, T. R. (1986). The validity of prison classification: An introduction to practical considerations and research issues. Crime & Delinquency, 32, 367-390.
16.
Kennedy, T. D. (1986). Trends in inmate classification: A status report of two computerized psychometric approaches. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 13, 165-184.
17.
Levinson, R. B. (1988). Developments in the classification process: Quay's AIMs approach. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 15, 24-38.
18.
MacKenzie, D. L. (1987). Age and adjustment to prison. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 14, 427-447.
19.
MacKenzie, D. L. , & Buchanan, R. A. (1990). The process of classification in prisons: A descriptive study of staff use of the system. Journal of Crime and Justice, 13, 1-24.
20.
Megargee, E. I. (1977). The need for a new classification system. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 4, 107-114.
21.
Monahan, J. (1981). Predicting violent behavior: An assessment of clinical techniques. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
22.
Morris, N. , & Miller, M. (1987). Predictions of dangerousness in the criminal law. (DGPO 87017108). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
23.
Nebraska Department of Correctional Services . (1992). Sixteenth annual report, fiscal year (1989-90). Lincoln, NE: Author.
24.
Olsen, S. E. , Barrick, D. M., & Cohen, L. E. (1983). Prison overcrowding and disciplinary problems: An analysis of the Texas prison system. Journal of Applied Behavior Science, 19, 163-176.
25.
Pugh v. Locke, 406 F. Supp. 318 (D. Alab. 1976).
26.
Ramos v. Lamm, 485 F. Supp. 122 (D. Colo. 1979).
27.
Stephen, J. (1990). Prison rule violators. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
28.
Stevens, J. (1986). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29.
Williams, F. (1986). Reasoning with statistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
