Evans, K. (2000). Reclaiming John Dewey: Democracy, inquiry, pragmatism, and public management. Administration & Society, 32 (3), 308-328.
2.
Hickman, L. (2004). On Hugh Miller on “Why old pragmatism needs an upgrade.”Administration & Society, 36 (4), 496-499.
3.
Miller, H. T. (2004). Why old pragmatism needs an upgrade. Administration & Society, 36 (2), 243-249.
4.
Rorty, R. (1999). Philosophy and social hope. New York: Penguin.
5.
Shields, P. (1996). Pragmatism: Exploring public administration’s policy imprint. Administration & Society, 28 (4), 390-411.
6.
Shields, P. (1998). Pragmatismas philosophy of science: Atool for public administration. In J. White (Ed.), Research in public administration (Vol. 4, pp. 195-226). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
7.
Shields, P. (2003). The community of inquiry: Classical pragmatism and public administration. Administration & Society, 35 (5), 510-538.
Snider, K. (1997). Pragmatism and the intellectual development of American public administration. Dissertation Abstracts International, 58, 810-810. (UMI No. 9726305)
10.
Snider, K. (1998). Living pragmatism: The case of Mary Parker Follett. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 20 (3), 274-286.
11.
Snider, K. (2000a). Expertise or experimenting? Pragmatism and American public administration: 1920-1950. Administration & Society, 32 (3), 329-354.
12.
Snider, K. (2000b). Rethinking public administration’s roots in pragmatism: The case of Charles A. Beard. American Review of Public Administration, 30 (2), 123-145.
13.
Stolcis, G. B. (2004). A view from the trenches: Comments on Miller’s “Why old pragmatism needs an upgrade.”Administration & Society, 36 (3), 362-372.
14.
Webb, J. L. (2004). Comment on Hugh T. Miller’s “Why old pragmatism needs an upgrade.”Administration & Society, 36 (4), 479-495.