The acquisition of temporal relations in the narratives of Thai children (aged 4 years, 6 years and 9 years) and of adults as control was investigated. Narratives were elicited using the `frog story'. Results revealed common and language-specific developmental patterns: (1) a developmental progression from relating events at a local to a more global level; (2) use of fewer forms that have a broader range of functions in the younger children; (3) acquisition of least restricted forms prior to more restricted forms; (4) qualified support for the acquisition of sequentiality prior to simultaneity. In the youngest children there was a greater reliance on usage of grammatical aspect; subsequently, as children acquired the ability to use bi-referential reference, temporal connectives played a more significant role. Eventually mature narrators are able to use a combination of explicit and implicit linguistic devices.
Aarssen, J. (2001). Development of temporal relations in narratives by Turkish-Dutch bilingual children. In L. Verhoeven & S. Strömqvist (Eds), Narrative development in a multilingual context (pp. 209—231). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2.
Aksu-Koç, A. & von Stutterheim, J. (1994). Temporal relations in narrative: Simultaneity. In R. A. Berman & D. I. Slobin (Eds), Different ways of relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study (pp. 393—455). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3.
Andersen, R.W. (1991). Developmental sequences: The emergence of aspect marking in second language acquisition. In T. Huebner & C. A. Ferguson (Eds), Crosscurrents in second language acquisition and linguistic theories (pp. 305—324). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
4.
Andersen, R.W. & Shirai, Y. (1994). Discourse motivations for some cognitive acquisition principles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 133—156.
5.
Andersen, R.W. & Shirai, Y. (1996). Primacy of aspect in first and second language acquisition: The pidgin/creole connection. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 527—570). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
6.
Bamberg, M.G.W. (1986). A functional approach to the acquisition to anaphoric relationships. Linguistics, 24(1/2), 227—284.
7.
Bennett, M. & Partee, B. (1972). Toward the logic of tense and aspect in English . Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
8.
Berman, R.A. (1996). Form and function in developing narrative abilities . In D. I. Slobin, J. Gerhardt, A. Kyratzis & G. Jiansheng (Eds), Social interaction, social context and language: Essays in honor of Susan Ervin-Tripp (pp. 343—367). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9.
Berman, R.A. (1998). Typological perspectives on connectivity. In N. Dittmar & Z. Penner (Eds), Issues in the theory of language acquisition (pp. 203—224). Bern, Germany: European Academic Publishers.
10.
Berman, R. A. & Slobin, D. I. (Eds) (1994). Different ways of relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
11.
Bloom, L., Lahey, M., Lifter, K. & Fiess, K. (1980). Complex sentences: Acquisition of syntactic connectives and the semantic relations they encode. Journal of Child Language7, 235—261.
12.
Boonyatispark, T. (1983). A study of aspect in Thai. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of London.
13.
Burusphat, S. (1991). The structure of Thai narrative. Dallas, TX: The Summer Institute of Linguistics.
14.
Chan, Y.-C. (1996). A semantic and cross-linguistic study of imperfective aspect in narrative discourse. Research Papers in Linguistics and Literature, 5, 49—68.
15.
Cholchitha, S. (2005). Temporal information in Thai. Unpublished Master's thesis, University of Texas at Austin.
16.
Clancy, P., Jacobsen, T. & Silva, M. (1976). The acquisition of conjunction: A cross-linguistic study. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 12, 71—80.
17.
Clark, E.V. (1970). How young children describe events in time. In G. B. Flores d'Arcais & W. J. M. Levelt (Eds), Advances in psycholinguistics (pp. 275—284). New York: Elsevier .
18.
Dasinger, L. & Toupin, C. (1994). The development of relative clause functions in narrative. In R. A. Berman & D. I. Slobin (Eds), Different ways of relating events in narratives: A crosslinguistic developmental study (pp. 457—514). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19.
Feagans, L. (1980). Children's understanding of some temporal terms denoting order, duration and simultaneity. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 9, 41—57.
20.
Hickmann, M. (1997). Information status and grounding in children's narratives: A crosslinguistic perspective. In J. Costermans & M. Fayol (Eds), Processing interclausal relationships: Studies in the production and comprehension of text (pp. 221—243). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21.
Hickmann, M. (2003). Children's discourse: Person. space and time across languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Hickmann, M. (2004). Coherence, cohesion, and context. Some comparative perspectives in narrative. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 281—306). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
23.
Hood, L., Lahey, M., Lifter, K. & Bloom, L. (1978). Observational descriptive methodology in studying child language: Preliminary results on the development of complex sentences . In G. P. Sackett (Ed.), Observing behaviour, Vol. 1, Theory and application in mental retardation (pp. 239—263). Baltimore : University Park Press.
24.
Hopper, P.J. (1979). Aspect and foregrounding in discourse. In T. Givon (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics 12: Discourse and Syntax (pp. 213—241). New York: Academic Press.
25.
Howard, K. (2000). The notion of current relevance in the Thai perfect . Linguistics, 38(2), 373—407.
26.
Kanchanawan, N. (1978). Expression for time in the Thai verb and its application to Thai-English machine translation. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
27.
Keller-Cohen, D. (1981). Elicited imitation in lexical development: Evidence from a study of temporal reference. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 10(3), 273—288.
28.
Koenig, J.P. & Muansuwan, N. (in press). The syntax of aspect in Thai. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory.
29.
Labov, W. & Waletzky, J. (1968). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts (pp. 12—14). Seattle : University of Washington Press.
30.
Li, P. & Shirai, Y. (2000). The acquisition of lexical and grammatical aspect . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
31.
Luksaneeyanawin, S. (1993). Speech computing and speech technology in Thailand . Proceedings of the Symposium on Natural Language Processing in Thailand, Chulalongkorn University, 17—21 March, 276—321.
32.
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
33.
Mayer, M. (1967). Frog where are you?New York : Dial Press.
34.
Meepoe, T.A. (1998). The interaction between lexical aspect and progressive imperfective in Thai: A discourse analysis of kamlaŋ and yùu. Journal of Language andLinguistics, 16(2), 56—66.
35.
Moens, M. & Steedman, M.J. (1986). Temporal information and natural language processing. (Edinburgh Research Papers in Cognitive Science: Research Paper EUCCS/RP-2). Edinburgh: Centre for Cognitive Science, Edinburgh University .
36.
Morgan, G. (2002). Children's encoding of simultaneity in British Sign Language narratives. Sign Language andLinguistics, 5(2), 131—165.
37.
Schmidt, T.P. (1992). A non-linear analysis of aspect in Thai narrative discourse. In K. L. Adams & T. J. Hudak (Eds), Papers from the second annual meeting of the South-East Asian Linguistics Society. (pp. 327—342). Tempe, Arizona: Arizona State University.
38.
Scovel, T. (1970). A grammar of time in Thai. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Michigan.
39.
Shirai, Y. (1998). The emergence of tense-aspect morphology in Japanese: Universal predisposition?First Language, 18, 281—309.
40.
Shirai, Y., Slobin, D.I. & Weist, R.E. (1998). Introduction to Special Issue `The acquisition of tense-aspect morphology'. First Language, 18, 245—253.
41.
Silva, M.N. (1991). Simultaneity in children's narratives: The case of when, while and as. Journal of Child Language, 18, 641—662.
42.
Slobin, D.I. (1985). Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. II: The data (pp. 1157—1256). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
43.
Slobin, D.I. (1996). From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”. In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 195—220). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
Slobin, D.I. (2003). Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds), Language in mind: Advances in the investigation of language and thought (pp. 157—191). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45.
Smith, C.S. & Erbaugh, M. (2005). Temporal interpretation in Mandarin Chinese, Linguistics, 43(4), 713—756.
46.
Strömqvist, S. & Verhoeven, L. (2004). Typological and contextual perspectives on narrative development. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 3—14). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
47.
Thepkanjana, K. (1986). Serial verb constructions in Thai. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.
48.
Vendler, Z. (1967). Verbs and times. Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
49.
Weist, R.M., Atanassova, M., Wysocka, J. & Pawlak, A. (1999). Spatial and temporal systems in child language and thought: A cross-linguistic study. First Language, 19, 267—311.
50.
Weist, R.M., Kaczmarek, A. & Wysocka, J. (1993). The function of aspectual configurations in the conversational and narrative discourse of Finnish, Polish and American children. Papers and Studies in ContrastiveLinguistics, 27, 79—106.
51.
Weist, R.M., Lyytinen, P., Wysocka, J. & Atanassova, M. (1997). The interaction of language and thought in children's language acquisition: A crosslinguistic study. Journal of Child Language, 24, 81—121.
52.
Winskel, H. (2003). An investigation into the acquisition of temporal event sequencing: A cross-linguistic study using an elicited imitation task . First Language, 23, 65—95.
53.
Zlatev, J. & Yangklang, P. (2003). Frog stories in Thai: Transcription and computerised analysis of 50 Thai narratives from 5 age groups [from CHILDES database].
