This article addresses the role of ‘employee voice’ in workplace
partnership. Drawing on two organizational case studies from the UK’s
aerospace sector, it analyses employee experiences of two key dimensions of worker
participation in partnership environments: joint consultation and union
representation. Specifically, it investigates what consultation and union
representation actually mean for employees in the context of different union
responses to employer-driven partnership agendas. The article finds predominantly
negative patterns of employee experience and attributes this partly to management
control strategies and the short-termist dynamic of British manufacturing capital.
Appelbaum, E.
,
T. Bailey
,
P. Berg
and
A.L. Kalleberg
(2000) Manufacturing Advantage: Why High Performance Work
Systems Pay Off.
Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
.
2.
Belanger P.R.
,
P.A. Lapointe
and
B. Levesque
(2002) ‘Workplace Innovation and the Role of
Institutions’, pp. 150-180 in
G. Murray
,
J. Belanger
,
A. Giles
and
P.A. Lapointe
(eds) Work and Employment Relations in the High-Performance
Workplace.
London and New York: Continuum
.
3.
Black, S.
and
L. Lynch
(1999) What’s Driving the New Economy: The Benefits
of Workplace Innovation, NBER Working Paper 7479.
Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research
.
4.
Boxall, P.
and
J. Purcell
(2003) Strategy and Human Resource Management.
Basing-stoke: Palgrave Macmillan
.
5.
Broad, G.
(1994)
‘Japan in Britain: The Dynamics of Joint Consultation’
, Industrial Relations Journal25(1):
26-38
.
6.
Brown, W.
(2000)
‘Putting Partnership into Practice in Britain’
, British Journal of Industrial Relations38(2):
299-316
.
7.
Bryson, A.
(2000) Have British Workers Lost their Voice, or Have They
Gained a New One?, PSI Research Discussion Paper No. 2.
London: PSI
.
8.
Bryson, A.
(2003) Employee Desire for Unionization in Britain and its
Implications for Union Organising, Policy Studies Institute Discussion Paper No.
12.
London: PSI
.
9.
Coupar, W.
and
B. Stevens
(1998) ‘Towards a New Model of Partnership:
Beyond the “HRM versus Industrial Relations”
Argument’, pp. 145-160 in
P. Sparrow
and
M. Marchington
(eds) Human Resource Management: The New Agenda.
London: FT Pitman Publishing
.
10.
Cully, M.
,
S. Woodland
,
A. O’Reilly
and
G. Dix
(1999) Britain at Work.
London: Routledge
.
11.
Danford A.
,
M. Richardson
,
P. Stewart
,
S. Tailby
and
M. Upchurch
(2004)
‘High Performance Work Systems and Workplace Partnership: A Case
Study of Aerospace Workers’
, New Technology, Work and Employment19(1):
14-29
.
12.
DTI (Department of Trade and Industry)
(2003) High Performance Workplace: Informing and Consulting
Employees, Consultation Document.
London: DTI
.
13.
Findlay, P.
and
A. McKinlay
(2003) ‘Organising in Electronics: Recruitment,
Recognition and Representation-Shadow Shop Stewards in Scotland’s
“Silicon Glen” ’, pp.
114-133 in
G. Gall
(ed.) Union Organising: Campaigning for Trade Union Recognition.
London: Routledge
.
14.
Findlay, P.
,
A. McKinlay
,
A. Marks
and
P. Thompson
(2002)
‘Mutual Gain or Mutual Strain? Exploring Employee Attitudes to Partnership’
, paper presented at the 20th Annual Labour Process
Conference, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow,
2-4 April.
15.
Gallie, D.
,
M. White
,
Y. Cheng
and
M. Tomlinson
(1998) Restructuring the Employment Relationship.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
16.
Gospel, H.
and
A. Pendleton
(2003)
‘Finance, Corporate Governance and the Management of Labour: A
Conceptual and Comparative Analysis’
, British Journal of Industrial Relations41(3):
557-582
.
17.
Guest, D.
and
R. Peccei
(2001)
‘Partnership at Work: Mutuality and the Balance of Advantage’
, British Journal of Industrial Relations39(2):
207-236
.
18.
Guest, D.
,
J. Michie
,
N. Conway
and
M. Sheehan
(2003)
‘Human Resource Management and Corporate Performance in the UK’
, British Journal of Industrial Relations41(2):
291-314
.
19.
Haynes, P.
and
M. Allen
(2001)
‘Partnership as Union Strategy: A Preliminary Evaluation’
, Employee Relations23(2):
164-187
.
20.
Heery, E.
(2002)
‘Partnership versus Organising: Alternative Futures for British
Trade Unionism’
, Industrial Relations Journal33(1):
20-35
.
21.
Hyman, J.
and
B. Mason
(1995) Managing Employee Involvement and Participation.
London: Sage
.
22.
IPA (Involvement and Participation Association)
(1997) Towards Industrial Partnership.
London: IPA
.
23.
Lloyd, C.
(2001)
‘What Do Employee Councils Do? The Impact of Non-Union Forms of
Representation on Trade Union Organization’
, Industrial Relations Journal32(4):
313-327
.
24.
Lovering, J.
(1998) ‘Opening Pandora’s Box: De
Facto Industrial Policy and the British Defence Industry’,
pp. 151-168 in
R. Delbridge
and
J. Lowe
(eds) Manufacturing in Transition.
London: Routledge
.
25.
Marchington, M.
and
A. Wilkinson
(2003) ‘Direct
Participation’, pp. 340-365 in
S. Bach
and
K. Sisson
(eds) Personnel Management: A Comprehensive Guide to Theory and
Practice, 3rd edn.Oxford: Blackwell
.
26.
Marchington, M.
,
J. Goodman
,
A. Wilkinson
and
P. Ackers
(1992) New Developments in Employee Involvement,
ED Research Series No. 2.
Sheffield: Employment Department
.
27.
Martinez Lucio, M.
and
M. Stuart
(2002)
‘Assessing Partnership: The Prospects for, and Challenges of, Modernization’
, Employee Relations23(3):
252-261
.
28.
Richardson, M.
,
P. Stewart
,
A. Danford
,
S. Tailby
and
M. Upchurch
(2004) ‘Employees’ Experience of
Workplace Partnership’, pp. 210-226 in
M. Stuart
and
M. Martinez Lucio
(eds) Partnership and Modernization in Employee Relations.
Basingstoke: Palgrave
.
29.
Terry, M.
(2003)
‘Partnership and the Future of Trade Unions in the UK’
, Economic and Industrial Democracy24(4):
485-507
.
30.
TUC (Trades Union Congress)
(2000) Partnership: A Boost to Business.
London: TUC
.
31.
TUC (Trades Union Congress)
(2003) High Performance Workplaces, report; at: www.tuc.org.uk/economy/tuc-6995-f0.cfm
32.
Waddington, J.
(2003)
‘What Do Representatives Think of the Practices of European Works
Councils? Views from Six Countries’
, European Journal of Industrial Relations9(3):
303-325
.
