Pyrolysis of cherry laurel ( Prunus Laurocerasus L.) seed in the presence of sodium carbonate

Abstract

The aim of this study was to obtain pyrolysis products from cherry laurel seed in the presence of Na₂CO₃. Bio-liquid, solid, and gaseous products were obtained from pyrolysis of cherry laurel seed samples. Cherry laurel seed samples were heated at a rate of 15 K/min from 298 K to a maximum temperature of 775 K. The nominal heating time was 30 min. The highest yield of bio-liquid product was 39.3%, which can be obtained from the pyrolysis with 5% Na₂CO₃. It was observed that the yield of bio-liquid product decreases with further increase of catalyst ratio.

Keywords

Cherry laurel seed pyrolysis bio-liquid bio-char gaseous products

Introduction

Biomass is a substantial renewable resource that can be used as a source of electricity, liquid, solid and gaseous fuels, heat, and chemicals (Ozturk, 2014; Peres et al., 2013; Qin et al., 2009). The methods available for energy production from biomass can be classified into two principal categories: (a) thermochemical conversion and (b) biological conversion processes. There are three main types of thermochemical conversion processes to producing biofuels and chemicals from biomass materials: pyrolysis, gasification, and combustion (Babu and Sheth, 2007; Kumar et al., 2009).

Pyrolysis is known to be a precursor to other thermo-chemical processes and is simply defined as the chemical changes occurring when heat is applied to biomass in the absence of oxygen (Demirbas, 2009a). It is a promising route to produce solid (bio-char), bio-liquid (bio-oil), and gaseous products (mainly CO₂, CO, CH₄, H₂, C₂H₆, C₂H₄, and minor amounts of higher gaseous organics) from biomass as alternative energy sources (Demirbas and Balat, 2007). Pyrolysis is the most effective method for producing bio-fuel with high fuel-to-feed ratios (Jahirul et al., 2012). The liquid and gaseous products can be used in engine and turbine for power generation. Bio-char product is useful as a source of renewable energy or for other applications, such as metal reductant, soil amendment, and the production of activated carbon and biocarbon electrodes (Blasi, 2008).

Temperature and residence time are two main factors for the product distribution of pyrolysis. Low temperatures and longer residence times favor the production of bio-char, whereas the high temperatures and short residence times lead to high yields of bio-liquid product (Balat et al., 2009). The most interesting temperature range for biofuel production from biomass pyrolysis is between 625 and 775 K (Demirbas, 2009b). Depending on the operating conditions (temperature, residence time, heating rate, and particle size), the pyrolysis process can be divided into three different categories: (a) conventional pyrolysis (carbonization), (b) fast pyrolysis, and (c) flash pyrolysis (Balat et al., 2009). If the aim is the production of mainly bio-liquid and gaseous products, a fast pyrolysis is recommended (Demirbas, 2005a). Fast pyrolysis is associated with tar at low temperature (675–775 K) (Bridgwater, 2003). At higher fast pyrolysis temperatures, the major product is gas. Depending on the feedstock characteristics, the process can produce 60–75 wt% of bio-liquid product, 15–25 wt% of bio-char, and 10–20 wt% of gas product (Mohan et al., 2006).

The production of bio-liquid and other products by pyrolysis of biomass species has been extensively studied during the past years (Demiral, 2014; Demirbas et al., 2013; Ertas and Alma, 2010; Özbay and Pütün, 2014). The aim of this study was to determine the yields of bio-liquid, bio-char, and gaseous products obtained from pyrolysis of cherry laurel (Prunus Laurocerasus L.) seed in the presence of Na₂CO₃.

Experimental

In this study, cherry laurel (karayemis or taflan in Turkish) seeds were used as biomass feedstocks. Cherry laurel is a popular fruit in the East Black Sea region of Turkey. The samples of cherry laurel were collected from Bozlu village of Besikduzu, Trabzon, Turkey. Before experiments, the air dried cherry laurel seed samples were grounded by grinder and sieved with a sieve shaker to obtain particle size between 1.5 and 2.3 mm.

The samples were subjected to pyrolysis in the presence of Na₂CO₃ with various percentages: 2, 5, and 7%. Cherry laurel seed samples were heated over a range of temperature from 298 to 775 K with a heating rate of 15 K/min.

The pyrolysis experiments were carried out in a laboratory scale apparatus. The scheme of the pyrolysis is shown in Figure 1. The main element of this device was a vertical reactor of stainless-steel. Figure 2 shows pyrolysis reactor. The reactor was inserted vertically into an electrically heated furnace and provided with an electrical heating system power source. The nominal heating time was 30 min. For each run, the heater was started at 298 K and terminated when the desired temperature.

Figure 1.

Schematic representation of pyrolysis unit: (1) heater, (2) glass container, (3) thermometer, (4) heat exchanger, and (5) container.

Figure 2.

The pyrolysis reactor.

Prior to the pyrolysis experiments, the samples were oven-dried for 2 h at a temperature of 376 ± 2 K until a constant weight. All the yields were expressed as wt% of the dry and ash-free (daf) basis. The bio-liquid products from pyrolysis of cherry laurel seed samples passing into the condenser were collected in an Erlenmeyer flask at atmospheric pressure.

Results and discussion

For structural analysis, the cherry laurel seed samples were prepared according to TAPPI standard (TAPPI T 11 m-45). The percent lignin of the ground sample was determined as the insoluble residue after hydrolysis with 72% sulfuric acid at 293 K. Table 1 shows the average analysis of cherry laurel seed samples. As can be seen from Table 1, lignin content of cherry laurel seed samples is 39.8 wt% daf. The pyrolysis of biomass with a high percentage of lignin content can produce better bio-liquid yields (Jahirul et al., 2012).

Table 1.

The average analyses of cherry laurel seed samples.

Analysis	wt% of used sample
Moisture content	9.8
Lignin content	39.8
Holocellulose content	50.4

The proximate and ultimate analysis results of the cherry laurel seed are presented in Table 2. Proximate analysis of cherry laurel seed samples were conducted using ASTM standards to obtain moisture content, volatile matter, and ash content. The moisture content was determined according to ASTM E1871-82 standard method (ASTM, 2006a). The volatile matter was determined using standard test methods ASTM E872-82 (ASTM, 2006b). For the volatile matter, 1 g of the oven-dried sample in powder form was placed in crucible of known weight. This was ignited in the furnace for 10 min at 873 K. The crucible was cooled and weighed and the percentage of volatile matter was expressed as the percentage of loss in weight to the oven-dried weight of the original sample. The ash content was determined according to ASTM E1755-01 standard method (ASTM, 2007). Before determining the ash content, moisture was removed from the cherry laurel seed sample as mentioned previously ASTM E1871-82. For the ash content, 2 g of the oven-dried sample was heated in the furnace for 3 h at 923 K. The crucible was cooled in a desiccator and ash content was expressed in terms of the oven-dried weight of the original sample. The fixed carbon was obtained from equation (1) (Garcia et al., 2012):

FC = 100 - (VM + AC)

(1)

where FC is the percentage of fixed carbon, VM is the percentage of volatile matter, and AC is the percentage of ash content.

Table 2.

Proximate and ultimate analysis of cherry laurel seed.

Characteristics	Cherry laurel seed
Proximate analysis (wt% daf basis)
Fixed carbon	19.6
Volatile matter	78.6
Ash content	1.8
Ultimate analysis (wt% dry basis)
Carbon content	49.8
Hydrogen content	6.2
Oxygen content	42.3
HHV (MJ kg⁻¹)	17.96

HHVs of biomass materials can be calculated from the proximate analysis data such as fixed carbon and volatile matter given in the literature (Demirbas, 1997; Yin, 2011). Higher heating values of cherry laurel seed samples as a function of fixed carbon was calculated from equation (2) (Demirbas, 1997):

HHV = 0.196 (FC) + 14.119

(2)

where HHV is higher heating value and FC is the percentage of fixed carbon.

Volatile matter refers to the part of biomass material that is released when the biomass is heated up to 673 to 773 K (Mitchual et al., 2014). Biomass generally contains a high level of volatile matter (up to 80%). Biomass, with high volatile matter content, generally produces high quantities of bio-oil and syngas (Demirbas, 2005b). Volatile matter content of cherry laurel seed was recorded as 78.6 wt% daf (Table 2). It has a fixed carbon percentage of 19.6 wt% daf (Table 2). With high volatile matter content and low fixed carbon content, cherry laurel seed samples have a typical biomass structure.

Woody biomass has a low ash content ranging from 1 to 5% (National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS), 2014). Cherry laurel seed has low ash content of around 1.8% (Table 2). The low ash content of biomass gives high volatile yield and bio-liquid yield increase, and it decreases gaseous yield (Lou et al., 2013).

The higher heating value (HHV in MJ/kg) includes the latent heat of vaporization of water in the combustion products, because the water vapor was allowed to condense to liquid water.

The higher heating value for cherry laurel seed was recorded as 17.96 MJ/kg (Table 2). The ultimate analysis gives the elemental composition of the samples in the dry basis. The major components of biomass fuel are carbon (30–60% of dry matter), oxygen (30–40% of dry matter), and hydrogen (5–6% of dry matter) (Chaney, 2010). It also contains a small proportion of nitrogen and sulfur (<1% of dry matter) (Chaney, 2010). The average contents of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen for cherry laurel seed were found to be 49.8%, 6.2%, and 42.3%, respectively.

Figure 3 shows the plot for total weight loss versus time by pyrolysis of cherry laurel seed sample in the presence of Na₂CO₃. The total weight loss was defined as,

Total weight loss = \frac{Pyrolyzed part of sample}{Mass of sample loaded into reactor} \times 100

(3)

Figure 3.

Plots for total weight loss versus time by pyrolysis of cherry laurel seed.

Total weight loss versus time by pyrolysis of cherry laurel seed sharply increased between 10 and 20 min for all runs. Then, it approached to the plateau value after 25 min for all runs. The yield of bio-char depends on the heating rate, residence time, and pyrolysis temperature (Cora Bulmău et al., 2010). The temperature-time history is an important parameter for pyrolysis of biomass. The temperature was raised from 298 to 775 K until 30 min. The average heating rate was 15 K/min during pyrolysis. The bio-char yields from non-catalytic run decreased from 82.5% to 30.2% between 10 and 30 min, respectively. At the same time, the bio-char yields from 5% Na₂CO₃ run decreased from 79.4% to 23.5% (Figure 3). The decrease in the bio-char yield could be due to the greater primary decomposition of cherry laurel seed samples at higher pyrolysis temperatures. The need for increased supplies of bio-char produced from improved and efficient pyrolytic processes is urgent (Balat and Demirbas, 2009).

Figure 4 shows the plots for yields of bio-liquid products versus time by pyrolysis of cherry laurel seed. The yield of bio-liquid products was defined as,

Yield of bio-liquid products = \frac{Condensed bio-liquids from pyrolysis}{Mass of sample loaded into reactor} \times 100

(4)

Figure 4.

Plots for yields of bio-liquid products versus time by pyrolysis of cherry laurel seed.

The yields of bio-liquid products sharply increases between 9 and 15 min with non-catalyst run, whereas 10 and 20 min with all catalyst runs. Then, the yields approach to the plateau value after 20 min for non-catalyst run, whereas 25 min for all catalyst runs. The yields of bio-liquid product increase with use of catalyst. It was observed that the yield of bio-liquid product increases slightly in conjunction with increasing catalyst ratio and reaches its maximum value with 5% Na₂CO₃ catalyst run. The yields of bio-liquid product from cherry laurel seed (wt% daf basis of the sample) for non-catalytic and 5% Na₂CO₃ catalytic runs were 29.5% and 39.3% for 30 min, respectively (Figure 4). It was observed that the yield of bio-liquid product decreases with further increase of catalyst ratio.

The bio-liquid products from cherry laurel seed pyrolysis are dark brown viscous oils. In general, at the beginning of the pyrolysis, the most of the bio-liquid products obtained from pyrolysis were water-rich fractions. They have a high water content (15–30 wt%) derived from the original moisture in the biomass feedstock and the product of the dehydration reactions occurring during pyrolysis (Lappas et al., 2008). Bio-liquid product typically has high oxygen content (40–50%) (Steele et al., 2009), burns smoothly and cleanly, and has a potential for alternative fuel source (Agarwal and Agarwal, 1999). Combustion tests have shown that bio-liquids could be burnt efficiently in standard or in slightly modified burners (Agarwal and Agarwal, 1999). According to Mullen and Boateng (2008), bio-liquids from wood agricultural feedstocks have a HHV about 50% and 75% that of heavy fuel oil, respectively. In generally, HHV of bio-liquid is below 26 MJ/kg (compared with 42–45 MJ/kg for conventional fuel oils) (Demirbas, 2007). Poor volatility, high viscosity, coking, corrosiveness, and cold flow properties are possibly the most challenging and have so far limited the range of their applications (Bridgwater, 2004).

Figure 5 shows the plots for yields of conversion versus time by pyrolysis of cherry laurel seed. The yield of conversion was defined as,

Yield of conversion = \frac{Condensed bio-liquids and gases from pyrolysis}{Mass of sample loaded into reactor} \times 100

(5)

Figure 5.

Plots for yields of conversion versus time by pyrolysis of cherry laurel seed.

The yields of conversion versus time by pyrolysis of cherry laurel seed samples were sharply increased from 10 to 20 min from 17.5 to 65.4% for non-catalytic run and from 20.6 to 74.4% for 5% Na₂CO₃ catalytic run, respectively. Then, it was approached to the plateau value after 25 min for all runs (Figure 5).

The gaseous products identified during the pyrolysis of cherry laurel seed samples were mainly CO₂, CO, CH₄, and H₂ and some low molecular weight hydrocarbons such as C₂H₆ and C₂H₄. The highest gaseous yield from cherry laurel seed samples was obtained without catalyst (40.3%) at 775 K for 30 min. The higher increase of gaseous yields at higher temperature range could be due to the cracking of the bio-liquids present in the vapor to gas and secondary decomposition of bio-chars into gas at higher temperature (Natarajan et al., 2009).

Conclusion

This study was conducted to determine the yields of bio-char, bio-liquid, and gaseous products obtained from cherry laurel seed in the presence of Na₂CO₃. Pyrolytic products can be used as fuels for heating or power generation. They can also be used as feedstocks for chemicals and material industries. Cherry laurel seed is an agricultural residue. The use of present agricultural residues can play an important role in reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions relative to burning fossil fuels. Cherry laurel seed, as agricultural residue, is very favorable in biofuel production.

The highest yield of bio-liquid product was 39.3%, which can be obtained from the pyrolysis with 5% Na₂CO₃. The yield of bio-liquid product is decreased with further increase of catalyst ratio. The bio-char yield reduced from 82.5% without catalyst to 30.2% between 10 and 30 min. The highest gaseous yield from samples was obtained without catalyst (40.3%) at 775 K for 30 min.

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

Agarwal

(1999) Recent technologies for the conversion of biomass into energy, fuels, and useful. TERI Information Monitor on Environmental Science 4: 1–12.

ASTM E1871-82 (2006a) Standard Test Method Moisture Analysis of Particulate Wood Fuels, West Conshohocken, PA: Annual Book of ASTM Standards.

ASTM E872-82 (2006b) Standard Test Method for Volatile Matter in the Analysis of Particulate Wood Fuels, West Conshohocken, PA: Annual Book of ASTM Standards.

ASTM E1755-01 (2007) Annual Book of ASTM Standards. Standard Test Method for Ash in Biomass, West Conshohocken, PA: Annual Book of ASTM Standards.

Babu

Sheth

(2007) Modeling and simulation of reduction zone of downdraft biomass gasifier: Effect of char reactivity factor. Journal of Engineering and Technology 47(15–16): 2602–2611.

Balat

Kırtay

(2009) Main routes for the thermo-conversion of biomass into fuels and chemicals. Part 1: Pyrolysis systems. Energy Conversion and Management 50(12): 3147–3157.

Balat

Demirbas

(2009) Bio-oil from pyrolysis of black alder wood. Energy Sources Part A 31(19): 1719–1727.

Blasi

(2008) Modeling chemical and physical processes of wood and biomass pyrolysis. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 34(1): 47–90.

Bridgwater

(2003) Renewable fuels and chemicals by thermal processing of biomass. Chemical Engineering Journal 91(2–3): 87–102.

10.

Bridgwater

(2004) Biomass fast pyrolysis. Thermal Science 8: 21–49.

11.

Chaney J (2010) Combustion characteristics of biomass briquettes. PhD Thesis, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK, pp.235.

12.

Cora Bulmău

Cosmin

Adrian

(2010) Pyrolysis parameters influencing the biochar generation from wooden biomass. UPB Scientific Bulletin, Series C 72(1): 29–38.

13.

Demiral

(2014) Pyrolysis of sugar beet bagasse for production of liquid fuels. Energy Sources Part A 36(24): 2684–2690.

14.

Demirbas

(1997) Calculation of higher heating values of biomass fuels. Fuel 76(5): 431–434.

15.

Demirbas

(2004) Combustion characteristics of different biomass fuels. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 30(2): 219–230.

16.

Demirbas

(2005a) Pyrolysis of ground beech wood in irregular heating rate conditions. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 73(1): 39–43.

17.

Demirbas

(2005b) Biodiesel production from vegetable oils via catalytic and non-catalytic supercritical methanol transesterification methods. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 31(5–6): 466–487.

18.

Demirbas

(2007) The influence of temperature on the yields of compounds existing in bio-oils obtained from biomass samples via pyrolysis. Fuel Processing Technology 88(6): 591–597.

19.

Demirbas

Balat

(2007) Review on pyrolysis of biomass for liquid fuels and chemicals. Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research 66(10): 797–804.

20.

Demirbas

(2009a) Biorefineries: Current activities and future developments. Energy Conversion and Management 50(11): 2782–2801.

21.

Demirbas

(2009b) Pyrolysis of biomass for fuels and chemicals. Energy Sources Part A 31(12): 1028–1037.

22.

Demirbas

Acar

(2013) Effect of initial moisture content on the yield of hydrogen from pyrolysis of beech wood. Energy Education Science and Technology Part C 5: 75–81.

23.

Ertas

Alma

(2010) Slow pyrolysis of chinaberry (Melia azedarach L.) seeds: characterization of bio-oils and bio-chars. Energy Education Science and Technology Part C 2: 149–170.

24.

Garcia

Pizarro

Lavin

(2012) Characterization of Spanish biomass waste for energy use. Bioresource Technology 103(1): 249–258.

25.

Jahirul

Rasul

Chowdhury

(2012) Biofuels production through biomass pyrolysis—A technological review. Energies 5(12): 4952–5001.

26.

Kumar

Jones

Hanna

(2009) Thermochemical biomass gasification: A review of the current status of the technology. Energies 2(3): 556–681.

27.

Lappas

Dimitropoulos

Antonakou

(2008) Design, construction, and operation of a transported fluid bed process development unit for biomass fast pyrolysis: Effect of pyrolysis temperature. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 47(3): 742–747.

28.

Lou

(2013) Factors related o minerals and ingredients influencing the distribution of pyrolysates derived from herbaceous biomass. Bioresources 8(1): 1345–1360.

29.

Mitchual

Frimpong-Mensah

Darkwa

(2014) Evaluation of fuel properties of six tropical hardwood timber species for briquettes. Journal of Sustainable Bioenergy Systems 4(1): 1–9.

30.

Mohan

Pittman

Steele

(2006) Pyrolysis of wood/biomass for bio-oil: A critical review. Energy Fuels 20(3): 848–889.

31.

Mullen

Boateng

(2008) Fast pyrolysis and bio-oil production from agricultural residues and energy crops. Energy Fuels 22(3): 2104–2109.

32.

Natarajan

Ganapathy Sundaram

(2009) Pyrolysis of rice husk in a fixed bed reactor. International Scholarly and Scientific Research and Innovation 56(3): 467–471.

33.

National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS) (2014) Biomass for Heat. Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP), Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy.

34.

Ozturk

(2014) Energy analysis for biodiesel production from rapeseed oil. Energy Exploration & Exploitation 32(6): 1031–1057.

35.

Özbay

Pütün

(2014) Pyrolysis of peach pulp: effect of chemical additives. Energy Sources Part A 36(23): 2546–2554.

36.

Peres

Lunelli

Maciel

(2013) Application of biomass to hydrogen and syngas production. Chemical Engineering Transactions 32: 589–594.

37.

Qin

Sun

Yao

(2009) Homogeneous production of biodiesels from vegetable oils. World Journal of Engineering 6(1): 139–142.

38.

Steele PH, Yu F and Gajjela S (2009) Past, present and future production of bio-oil. In: FPS conference on woody biomass utilization, Starkville, MS, pp.17–22.

39.

Yin

(2011) Prediction of higher heating values of biomass from proximate and ultimate analyses. Fuel 90(3): 1128–1132.