The present study explores the influence of need for closure as well as authoritarian submission (Right-Wing Authoritarianism [RWA]) and authoritarian dominance (Social Dominance Orientation [SDO]) on the genesis of conservative beliefs and racism. For this purpose, two structural equation models were compared. In Model 1, RWA and SDO were entered as independent variables and the need for closure facets Decisiveness and Need for Simple Structure acted as mediator variables. In Model 2, the need for closure facets served as independent variables and RWA and SDO acted as mediators. In two student samples (Sample 1, N = 399, Sample 2, N = 330) and one adult sample (Sample 3, N = 379), Model 2 showed superior fit to the data. These results corroborate the hypothesis that authoritarianism should be interpreted in terms of generalized beliefs rather than in terms of personality characteristics. In addition, analyses show that the effects of Need for Simple Structure on conservative beliefs and racism are fully mediated by RWA but only partly by SDO. These results suggest a differential genesis of RWA and SDO.
References
1.
Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.
2.
Akaike, H. (1973). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In B. N. Petrov & F. Csaki (Eds.), Second international symposium on information theory (pp. 267-281). Budapest, Hungary: Academiei Kiado.
3.
Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Manitoba, Canada: University of Manitoba Press.
4.
Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other “authoritarian personality”. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 47-92). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
5.
Alwin, D. F., & Krosnick, J. A. (1991). Aging, cohorts, and the stability of sociopolitical orientations over the life span. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 169-195.
6.
Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software.
7.
Billiet, J., & De Witte, H. (1991). Naar racisme neigende houdingen in Vlaanderen: Typologie en maatschappelijk achtergronden [Attitudes tending towards racism in Flanders (Belgium): Typology and societal backgrounds]. Leuven, Belgium: Sociologisch Onderzoeksinstituut (SOI).
8.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Research and Methods, 16, 492-503.
9.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-161). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
10.
Budner, S. (1962). Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable. Journal of Personality, 30, 29-50.
11.
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131.
12.
Chirumbolo, A. (2002). The relationship between need for cognitive closure and political orientation: The mediating role of authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 603-610.
13.
Cratylus. (1995). Need for closure (Nederlandse versie). Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit, Vakgroep Sociale Psychologie.
14.
Davies, M. F. (1998). Dogmatism and belief formation: Output interference in the processing of supporting and contradictory cognitions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 456-466.
15.
De Witte, H. (1990). Conformisme, radicalisme en machteloosheid: Een onderzoek naar de sociaal-culturele en sociaal-economische opvattingen van arbeiders in Vlaanderen [Conformism, radicalism and powerlessness: In search of socio-cultural and socio-economical attitudes among workers in Flanders]. Leuven, Belgium: K.U. Leuven, HIVA.
16.
Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideologyand prejudice. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 41-113). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
17.
Duckitt, J., Wagner, C., du Plessis, I., & Birum, I. (2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 75-93.
18.
Dunning, D. (1999). A newer look: Motivated social cognition and the schematic representation of social concepts. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 1-11.
19.
Duriez, B. (in press). A research note on the relation between religiosity and racism: The importance of the way in which religious contents are being processed. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion.
20.
Duriez, B., Fontaine, J. R. J., & Hutsebaut, D. (2000). A further elaboration of the Post-Critical Belief Scale: Evidence for the existence of four different approaches to religion in Flanders-Belgium. Psychologica Belgica, 40, 153-181.
21.
Duriez, B., & Hutsebaut, D. (2000). The relation between religion and racism: The role of post critical beliefs. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 3, 85-102.
22.
Duriez, B., Luyten, P., Snauwaert, B., & Hutsebaut, D. (2002). The importance of religiosity and values in predicting political attitudes: Evidence for the continuing importance of religion in Flanders (Belgium). Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 5, 35-54.
23.
Duriez, B., & Van Hiel, A. (2002). The march of modern fascism: A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1199-1213.
24.
Duriez, B., VanHiel, A., & Kossowska, M. (in press). Authoritarianism and social dominance in Western and Eastern Europe: The importance of the socio-political context and of political interest and involvement. Political Psychology.
25.
Durrheim, K. (1997). Theoretical conundrum: The politics and science of theorizing authoritarian cognition. Political Psychology, 18, 625-647.
26.
Eysenck, H. J. (1954). The psychology of politics. London: Routledge, Keegan Paul.
27.
Frenkel-Brunswik, E. (1949). Intolerance of ambiguity as an emotional and perceptual personality variable. Journal of Personality, 19, 108-143.
28.
Greenberg, J., Simon, L., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., & Chatel, D. (1992). Terror management and tolerance: Does mortality salience always intensify negative reactions to others who threaten one’s worldview? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 212-220.
29.
Guimond, S., Dambrun, M., Michinov, N., & Duarte, S. (2003). Does social dominance generate prejudice? Integrating individual and contextual determinants of intergroup cognitions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 697-721.
30.
Harvey, O. J. (1963). Authoritarianism and conceptual functioning in varied conditions. Journal of Personality, 31, 462-470.
31.
Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 1-45.
32.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
33.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996a). LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
34.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996b). PRELIS 2: User’s reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
35.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339-375.
36.
Kemmelmeier, M. (1997). Need for closure and political orientation among German university students. Journal of Social Psychology, 137, 787-789.
37.
Kinder, D. R., & Sears, D. O. (1981). Prejudice and politics: Symbolic racism versus racial threats to the good life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 414-431.
38.
Klein, T. F., & Webster, D. M. (2000). Individual differences in argument scrutiny as motivated by need for cognitive closure. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 22, 119-129.
39.
Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.
40.
Kossowska, M., & Van Hiel, A. (2003). The relationship between need for closure and conservative beliefs in Western and Eastern Europe. Political Psychology, 24, 501-518.
41.
Kossowska, M., Van Hiel, A., Chun, W. Y., Kruglanski, A. W. (2002). The need for cognitive closure scale: Structure, cross-cultural invariance, and comparison of mean ratings between European American and East Asian samples. Psychologica Belgica, 42, 267-286.
42.
Kruglanski, A. W., DeGrada, E., Mannetti, L., Atash, M. N., & Webster, D. M. (1997). Psychological theory testing versus psychometric nay-saying: Comment on Neuberg et al.’s (1997) critique of the Need for Closure Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1005-1016.
43.
Kruglanski, A. W., & Freund, T. (1983). The freezing and un-freezing of lay-inferences: Effects of impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping and numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 448-468.
44.
Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: Seizing and freezing. Psychological Review, 103, 263-283.
45.
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480-498.
46.
Lippa, R., & Arad, S. (1999). Gender, personality, and prejudice: The display of authoritarianism and social dominance in interviews with college men and women. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 463-493.
47.
Lipset, S. (1981). Political man: The social basis of politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
48.
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., Balla, J. R., & Grayson, D. (1998). Is more ever too much? The number of indicators per factor in confirmatory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33, 181-220.
49.
McFarland, S. G. (1998, July). Toward a typology of prejudiced persons. Paper presented at the annual convention of the International Society for Political Psychology, Montreal, Canada.
50.
McFarland, S. G. (1999, July). Personality, values, and latent prejudice: A test of a causal model. Paper presented at the annual convention of the International Society for Political Psychology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
51.
McFarland, S. G., & Adelson, S. (1996, July). An omnibus study of personality, values, and prejudice. Paper presented at the annual convention of the International Society for Political Psychology, Vancouver, British Columbia.
52.
Meloen, J. D. (1991). Inventarisatie Nederlandse F-schalen 1959-1990 [Inventorization of Dutch F-scales]. In P. Scheepers & R. Eisinga (Eds.), Onderdanig en Intolerant. Lacunes en controverses in autoritarisme-studies [Submissive and intolerant. Lacunae and controversies in studies on authoritarianism] (pp. 186-222). Nijmegen, the Netherlands: ITS.
53.
Meloen, J. D. (1993). The F-scale as a predictor of fascism: An overview of 40 years of authoritarianism research. In W. F. Stone, G. Lederer, & R. Christie (Eds.), Strength and weakness: The Authoritarian Personality Today (pp. 47-69). New York: Springer Verlag.
54.
Middendorp, C. (1978). Progressiveness and conservatism: The fundamental dimensions of ideological controversy and their relationship to social class. New York: Mouton.
55.
Neuberg, S. L., Judice, T. N., & West, S. G. (1997). What the Need for Closure Scale measures and what it does not: Toward differentiating among related epistemic motives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1396-1412.
56.
Neuberg, S. L., West, S. G., Judice, T. N., & Thompson, M. M. (1997). On dimensionality, discriminant validity, and the role of psychometric analyses in personality theory and measurement: Reply to Kruglanski et al.’s (1997) defense of the Need for Closure Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1017-1029.
57.
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social Dominance Orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763.
58.
Reynolds, K. J., Turner, J. C., Haslam, S. A., & Ryan, M. K. (2001). The role of personality and group factors in explaining prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 427-434.
59.
Rokeach, M. (1948). Generalized mental rigidity as a factor in ethnocentrism. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 43, 259-277.
60.
Rokeach, M. (1960). The open and closed mind. New York: Basic Book Publishers.
61.
Rudin, S. A., & Stagner, R. (1958). Figure-ground perception of physical and social stimuli. Journal of Psychology, 45, 213-225.
62.
Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variable analysis: Applications in developmental research (pp. 399-419). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
63.
Saucier, G. (2000). Isms and the structure of social attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 366-385.
64.
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1-65). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
65.
Shah, J. Y., Kruglanski, A. W., & Thompson, E. P. (1998). Membership has its (epistemic) rewards: Need for closure effects on ingroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 383-393.
66.
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
67.
Skitka, L. J., Mullen, E., Griffin, T., Hutchinson, S., & Chamberlin, B. (2002). Dispositions, scripts, or motivated correction? Understanding ideological differences in explanations for social problems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 470-487.
68.
Sniderman, P., & Tetlock, P. E. (1986). Symbolic racism: Problems of motive attribution in political analysis. Journal of Social Issues, 42, 129-150.
69.
Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1982 (pp. 290-312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
70.
Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. C. (1980, May). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA.
71.
Tetlock, P. E. (1983). Cognitive style and political ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 118-126.
72.
Tetlock, P. E. (1993). Cognitive structural analysis of political rhetoric: Methodological and theoretical issues. In S. Iyengar & W. J. McGuire (Eds.), Explorations in political psychology (pp. 380-405). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
73.
Van Hiel, A., & Duriez, B. (2002). Een meetinstrument voor individuele verschillen in Sociale Dominantie Oriëntatie [A scale to measure individual differences in social dominance orientation]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psycholgie en haar Grensgebieden, 57, 114-116.
74.
Van Hiel, A., & Mervielde, I. (1996). Personality and current political beliefs. Psychologica Belgica, 36, 221-226.
75.
Van Hiel, A., & Mervielde, I. (2002a). Effects of ambiguity and need for closure on the acquisition of information. Social Cognition, 20, 380-408.
76.
Van Hiel, A., & Mervielde, I. (2002b). Explaining conservative beliefs and political preferences: A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 965-976.
77.
Van Hiel, A., & Mervielde, I. (2002c). Social identification among political party voters and members: An empirical test of Optimal Distinctiveness Theory. Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 202-209.
78.
Van Hiel, A., & Mervielde, I. (2003). Authoritarianism and social dominance orientation: Relationships with various forms of racism. Manuscript submitted for publication.
79.
Van Hiel, A., & Mervielde, I. (2003). The need for closure and the spontaneous use of complex and simple cognitive structures. Journal of Social Psychology, 143, 559-568.
80.
Verkuyten, M., & Hagendoorn, L. (1998). Prejudice and self-categorization: The variable role of authoritarianism and ingroup stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 99-110.
81.
Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1049-1062.
82.
White, J., Alter, R. D., & Rardin, M. (1965). Authoritarianism, dogmatism, and the usage of conceptual categories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 293-295.
83.
Wilson, G. D. (1973). The psychology of conservatism. London: Academic Press.
