Regulatory focus theory (Higgins, 1997, 1998) suggests that individuals in a promotion focus emphasize a congruence between an action and an intended outcome, which may foster illusions of control (IOC) even in the absence of an objective relationship between action and outcome. Individuals in a prevention focus should demonstrate a reverse bias that buffers against the development of IOC. Three studies were conducted to test this hypothesis, which either measured chronic individual differences in regulatory focus (Study 1) or manipulated regulatory focus (Studies 2 and 3). All studies found evidence that promotion-focused individuals report higher IOC concerning an uncontrollable outcome than prevention-focused individuals. In addition, Study 3 showed that IOC developed in a promotion focus buffer against the emotional consequences of failure. The results suggest that IOC evolve in a way that increases regulatory fit (Higgins, 2000).
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
Alloy, L. B., & Abramson, L. Y. (1979). Judgment of contingency in depressed and non-depressed students: Sadder but wiser?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 441-485.
3.
Alloy, L. B., & Clements, C. M. (1992). Illusions of control: Invulnerability to negative affect and depressive symptoms after laboratory and natural stressors. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 101, 234-245.
4.
Bandura, A. (1998). Self-efficacy (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
5.
Cohen, P., Cohen, J., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
Colvin, C. R., & Block, J. (1994). Do positive illusions foster mental health? An examination of the Taylor and Brown formulation. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 3-20.
7.
Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 117-132.
8.
Fazio, R. H. (1990). A practical guide to the use of response latency in social psychological research. In C. Hendrick & M. S. Clark (Eds.), Research methods in personality and social psychology: Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 74-97). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9.
Förster, J., Grant, H., Idson, L. C., & Higgins, E. T. (2001). Success/failure feedback, expectancies, and approach/avoidance motivation: How regulatory focus moderates classic relations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 253-260.
10.
Friedman, R., & Förster, J. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1001-1013.
11.
Heltzer, R., & Vyse, S. A. (1994). Intermittent consequences and problem solving: The experimental control of “superstitious” beliefs. Psychological Record, 44, 155-169.
12.
Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280-1300.
13.
Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 1-46). New York: Academic Press.
14.
Higgins, E. T. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 52, 1280-1300.
15.
Higgins, E. T., Roney, C., Crowe, E., & Hymes, C. (1994). Ideal versus ought predilections for approach and avoidance: Distinct self-regulatory systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 276-286.
16.
Higgins, E. T., Shah, J., & Friedman, R. (1997). Emotional responses to goal attainment: Strength of regulatory focus as moderator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 515-525.
17.
Houghton, G., & Tipper, S. P. (1998). A model of selective attention as a mechanism of cognitive control. In J. Grainger & A. M. Jacobs (Eds.), Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition (pp. 39-74). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 311-328.
19.
Liberman, N., Molden, D. C., Idson, L. C., & Higgins, E. T. (2001). Promotion and prevention focus on alternative hypotheses: Implications for attributional functions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 5-18.
20.
Matthews, G., Jones, D. M., & Chamberlain, A. G. (1990). Refining the measurement of mood: The UWIST Mood Adjective Checklist. British Journal of Psychology, 81, 17-42.
21.
McKenna, F. P. (1993). It won’t happen to me: Unrealistic optimism or illusion of control?British Journal of Psychology, 84, 39-50.
22.
Robins, R. W., & Beer, J. (2001). Positive illusions about the self: Their correlates and consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 340-352.
23.
Roese, N. J., Hur, T., & Pennington, G. L. (1999). Counterfactual thinking and regulatory focus: Implications for action versus inaction and sufficiency versus necessity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1109-1120.
24.
Shah, J., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Expectancy × Value Effects: Regulatory focus as a determinant of magnitude and direction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 447-458.
25.
Spiegel, S., Grant-Pillow, H., & Higgins, E. T. (2004). How regulatory fit enhances motivational strength during goal pursuit. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 39-54.
26.
Tanner, W. P., & Swets, J. A. (1954). A decision-making theory of visual detection. Psychological Review, 61, 401-409.
27.
Taylor, S. E. (1989). Positive illusions: Creative self-deception and the healthy mind. New York: Basic Books.
28.
Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193-210.
29.
Thompson, S. C. (2004). Illusions of control. In R. Pohl (Ed.), Cognitive illusions (pp. 113-126). New York: Taylor & Francis.
30.
Thompson, S. C., Armstrong, W., & Thomas, C. (1998). Illusions of control, underestimation and accuracy: A control heuristics explanation. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 143-161.
31.
Van-Dijk, D., & Kluger, A. N. (2004). Feedback sign effect of motivation: Is it moderated by regulatory focus?Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53, 113-135.
32.
Weinstein, N. D., & Lyon, J. E. (1999). Mindset, optimistic bias about personal risk and health-protective behaviour. British Journal of Health Psychology, 4, 289-300.
