Evolutionary scientists propose that exaggerated secondary sexual characteristics are cues of genes that increase offspring viability or reproductive success. In six studies the hypothesis that muscularity is one such cue is tested. As predicted, women rate muscular men as sexier, more physically dominant and volatile, and less committed to their mates than nonmuscular men. Consistent with the inverted-U hypothesis of masculine traits, men with moderate muscularity are rated most attractive. Consistent with past research on fitness cues, across two measures, women indicate that their most recent short-term sex partners were more muscular than their other sex partners (ds = .36, .47). Across three studies, when controlling for other characteristics (e.g., body fat), muscular men rate their bodies as sexier to women (partial rs = .49-.62) and report more lifetime sex partners (partial rs = .20-.27), short-term partners (partial rs = .25-.28), and more affairs with mated women (partial r = .28).
Alcock, J. (2005). Animal behavior: An evolutionary approach. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
2.
Anderson, K.G. (2006). How well does paternity confidence match actual paternity? Evidence from worldwide nonpaternity rates. Current Anthropology, 47, 435-461.
3.
Andersson, M. (1994). Sexual selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4.
Bhasin, S. (2003). Regulation of body composition by androgens. Journal of Endocrinological Investigation, 26, 814-822.
5.
Boyd, R., & Richerson, P.J. (2005). The origin and evolution of cultures. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
6.
Buchanan, K.L., Evans, M.R., Goldsmith, A.R., Bryant, D.M., & Rowe, L.V. (2001). Testosterone influences basal metabolic rate in male house sparrows: A new cost of dominance signaling. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 268, 1337-1344.
7.
Buss, D.M., & Schmitt, D.P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204-232.
8.
Campbell, B.C., Pope, H.G., & Filliault, S. (2005). Body image among Ariaal men from Northern Kenya . Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 371-379.
9.
Cassidy, C.M. (1991). The good body: When big is better. Medical Anthropology, 13, 181-213.
10.
Dixson, A.F., Halliwell, G., East, R., Wignarajah, P., & Anderson, M. (2003). Masculine somatotype and hirsuteness as determinants of sexual attractiveness to women. Archives of Sexual Behavior , 32, 29-39.
11.
Fallon, A.E., & Rozin, P. (1985). Sex differences in perceptions of desirable body shape. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 94, 102-105.
12.
Fink, B., Grammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (2001). Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness in relation to skin texture and color. Journal of ComparativePsychology, 115, 92-99.
13.
Folstad, I., & Karter, A. (1992). Parasites, bright males, and the immunocompetence handicap. American Naturalist, 139, 603-622.
14.
Franzoi, S.L., & Herzog, M.E. (1987). Judging physical attractiveness: What body aspects do we use?Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 19-33.
15.
Frederick, D.A., Buchanan, G.M., Berezovskaya, A., Peplau, L.A., Haselton, M.G., & Lipinski, R.E. (in press). Desiring the muscular ideal: Men's body satisfaction in the United States, Ukraine, and Ghana. Psychology of Men and Masculinity.
16.
Frederick, D.A., Fessler, D.M.T., & Haselton, M.G. (2005). Do representations of male muscularity differ in men's and women's magazines? Body Image: AnInternational Journal of Research, 2, 81-86.
17.
Frederick, D.A., Haselton, G.M., Buchanan, G.M., & Gallup, G.G., Jr. (2003). An evolved preference for muscularity? Evidence from women's preferences for short-term and long-term partners. Paper presented at the Human Evolution and Behavior Conference , Lincoln, NE.
18.
Gangestad, S.W., Garver-Apgar, C.E., Simpson, J.A., & Cousins, A.J. (2007). Changes in women's mate preferences across the ovulatory cycle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 92, 151-163.
19.
Gangestad, S.W., & Simpson, J.A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 23, 573-644.
20.
Gangestad, S.W., & Thornhill, R. (1998). Menstrual cycle variation in women's preference for the scent of symmetrical men. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 265, 927-933.
21.
Gangestad, S.W., Thornhill, R., & Garver-Apgar, C.E. (2005). Adaptations to ovulation . In D. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 292-343). New York: John Wiley.
22.
Getty, T. (2002). Signalling health versus parasites. American Naturalist, 159, 364-371.
23.
Getty, T. (2006). Sexually selected signals are not similar to sports handicaps. Trends inEcology and Evolution, 21, 83-88.
24.
Haselton, M.G., & Gangestad, S.W. (2006). Conditional expression of women's desires and men's mate guarding across the ovulatory cycle. Hormones and Behavior, 49, 509-518.
25.
Hughes, S.M., & Gallup, G.G., Jr. (2003). Sex differences in morphological predictors of sexual behaviors: Shoulder to hip and waist to hip ratios. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 173-178.
26.
Johnston, V.S., Hagel, R., Franklin, M., Fink, B., & Grammer, K. (2001). Male facial attractiveness. Evidence for hormone-mediated adaptive design. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 251-267.
27.
Kaplan, H.S., & Gangestad, S.W. (2005). Life history theory and evolutionary psychology. In D. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 68-95). New York: John Wiley.
28.
Kenrick, D.T., Sundie, J.M., Nicastle, L.D., & Stone, G.O. (2001). Can one ever be too wealthy or too chaste? Searching for nonlinearities in mate judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 462-471.
29.
Kokko, H., Brooks, R., Jennions, M.D., & Morley, J. (2003). The evolution of mate choice and mating biases . Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 270, 653-664.
30.
Li, N.P., & Kenrick, D.T. (2006). Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: What, whether, and why. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 468-489.
31.
Lipinski, J.P., & Pope, H.G., Jr. (2002). Body ideals in young Samoan men: A comparison with men in North America and Europe. International Journal of Men's Health, 1, 163-171.
32.
Loos, R., Thomis, M., Maes, H.H., Beunen, G., Claessens, A.L., Derom, C., et al. (1997). Gender-specific regional changes in genetic structure of muscularity in early adolescence. Journal of Applied Physiology, 82, 1802-1810.
33.
Maisey, D.S., Vale, E.L., Cornelissen, P.L., & Tovee, M.J. (1999). Characteristics of male attractiveness for women . Lancet, 353, 1500.
34.
McIntyre, M., Gangestad, S.W., Gray, P.B., Chapman, J.F., Burnham, T.C., O'Rourke, M.T., et al. (2006). Romantic involvement often reduces men's testosterone levels—but not always. The moderating role of extrapair sexual interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 91, 642-651.
35.
Moller, A.P. (1997). Developmental stability and fitness: A review . American Naturalist, 149, 916-932.
36.
Olivardia, R., Pope, H.G., Borowiecki, J.J., & Cohane, G.H. (2004). Biceps and body image: The relationship between muscularity and self-esteem, depression, and eating disorder symptoms. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 5, 112-120.
37.
Pawlowski, B., & Dunbar, R.I. (1999). Impact of market value on human mate choice decisions . Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 266, 281-285.
38.
Penton-Voak, I.S., & Perrett, D.I. (2000). Female preference for male faces changes cyclically: Further evidence. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 39-48.
Peters, A. (2000). Testosterone treatment is immunosuppressive in superb fairy-wrens, yet free-living males with high testosterone are more immunocompetent. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 267, 883-889.
41.
Pillsworth, E.G., & Haselton, M.G. (2006). Male sexual attractiveness predicts differential ovulatory shifts in female extra-pair attraction and male mate retention. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 247-258.
42.
Platek, S.M., Critton, S.R., Burch, R.L., Frederick, D.A., Myers, T.E., & Gallup, G.G., Jr. (2003). How much paternal resemblance is enough? Sex differences in hypothetical investment decisions but not in the detection of resemblance. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 81-87.
43.
Pope, H.G., Gruber, A.J., Mangweth, B., Bureau, B., deCol, C., Jouvent, R., et al. (2000). Body image perception among men in three countries. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 1297-1301.
44.
Rantala, M.J., Vainikka, A., & Kortet, R. (2003). The role of juvenile hormone in immune function and pheromone production trade-offs: A test of the immunocompetence handicap principle. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 270, 2257-2261.
45.
Rhodes, G., Zebrowitz, L.A., Clark, A., Kalick, S.M., Hightower, A., & McKay, R. (2001). Do facial averageness and symmetry signal health ? Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 31-46.
46.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
47.
Scutt, D., Manning, J.T., Whitehouse, G.H., Leinster, S.J., & Massey, C.P. (1997). The relationship between breast asymmetry, breast size and the occurrence of breast cancer. British Journal ofRadiology, 70, 1017-1021.
48.
Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 293-307.
49.
Storer, T.W., Magliano, L., Woodhouse, L., Lee, M.L., Dzekov, C., Dzekov, J., et al. (2003). Testosterone dose-dependently increases maximal voluntary strength and leg power, but does not affect fatigability or specific tension. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 88, 1478-1485.
50.
Sugiyama, L.S. (2005). Physical attractiveness in adaptationist perspective . In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 292-343). New York: John Wiley.
51.
Swami, V., & Tovee, M.J. (2005). Male physical attractiveness in Britain and Malaysia: A cross-cultural study. Body Image: An International Journal of Research, 2, 383-393.
52.
Symons, D. (1995). Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder: The evolutionary psychology of human female sexual attractiveness. In P. R. Abramson & S. D. Pinkerton (Eds.), Sexual nature, sexual culture (pp. 80-119). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
53.
Thomis, M.A., Beunen, G.P., Maes, H.H., Cameron, J., Van Leemputte, M., Claessens, A.L., et al. (1998). Strength training: Importance of genetic factors. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 30, 724-731.
54.
Thomis, M.A., Beunen, G.P., Van Leemputte, M., Maes, H.H., Blimkie, C.J., Claessen, A.L., et al. (1998). Inheritance of static and dynamic arm strength and some of its determinants. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica , 163, 59-71.
55.
Thomis, M.A., Van Leemputte, M.V., Maes, H.H., Blimkie, C.J., Claessens, A.L., Marchal, G., et al. (1997). Multivariate genetic analysis of maximal isometric force at different elbow angles. Journal of Applied Physiology, 82, 959-967.
56.
Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S.W. (1994). Human fluctuating asymmetry and sexual behavior. Psychological Science, 5, 297-302.
57.
Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man: 1871-1971 (pp. 136-179). Chicago: Aldine.
58.
Wang, C., Wang, C., Swerdloff, R.S., Iranmanesh, A., Dobs, A., Snyder, P.J., et al. (2000). Transdermal testosterone gel improves sexual function, mood, muscle strength, and body composition parameters in hypogonadal men. American Journal of Physiology, Endocrinology, andMetabolism , 85, 2839-2853.
59.
Wong, B.B.M., & Candolin, U. (2005). How is female mate choice affected by male competition . Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , 80, 559-571.
60.
Yang, C.F.J., Gray, P., & Pope, H.G., Jr. (2005). Male body image in Taiwan versus the West: Yangghang Zhiqi meets the Adonis Complex. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 263-269.
61.
Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection—A selection for a handicap. Journal of TheoreticalBiology, 53, 205-214.
