This research examines how moral values regulate the behavior of individual group members. It argues that group members behave in line with moral group norms because they anticipate receiving ingroup respect when enacting moral values that are shared by ingroup members. Data from two experimental studies offer evidence in support. In Study 1 (N = 82), morality-based (but not competence-based) ingroup norms determined whether members of a low-status group opted for individual versus collective strategies for status improvement. This effect was mediated by anticipated ingroup respect and emerged regardless of whether group norms prescribed collectivistic or individualistic behavior. These effects were replicated in Study 2 (N = 69), where no comparable effect was found as a result of moral norms communicated by a higher status outgroup. This indicates that social identity implications rather than interdependence or more generic concerns about social approval or importance of cooperation drive these effects.
Aquino, K., Freeman, D., Reed, A., II, Lim, V.K.G., & Felps, W. ( 2009). Testing a social-cognitive model of moral behavior: The interactive influence of situations and moral identity centrality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 123-141.
2.
Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. ( 1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
3.
Barreto, M., & Ellemers, N. ( 2000). You can’t always do what you want: Social identity and self-presentational determinants of the choice to work for a low-status group. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 891-906.
4.
Bettencourt, B.A., & Hume, D. ( 1999). The cognitive contents of social-group identity: Values, emotions, and relationships. European Journal of Social Psychology , 29, 113-121.
5.
Capozza, D., Bonaldo, E., & Di Maggio, A. ( 1982). Problems of identity and social conflict: Research on ethnic groups in Italy. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 299-334). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Cialdini, R.B., & Goldstein, N.J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591-621.
7.
Ellemers, N., Doosje, B., & Spears, R. ( 2004). Sources of respect: The effects of being liked by ingroups and outgroups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 155-172.
8.
Ellemers, N., Pagliaro, S., Barreto, M., & Leach, C.W. ( 2008). Is it better to be moral than smart? The effects of morality and competence norms on the decision to work at group status improvement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1397-1410.
9.
Ellemers, N., & Rink, F. ( 2005). Identity in work groups: The beneficial and detrimental consequences of multiple identities and group norms for collaboration and group performance. Advances in Group Processes, 22, 1-41.
10.
Ferrin, D.L., Kim, P.H., Cooper, C.D., & Dirks, K.T. ( 2007). Silence speaks volumes: The effectiveness of reticence in comparison to apology and denial for responding to integrity- and competence-based trust violations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 893-908.
11.
Fiske, S.T., Cuddy, A.J.C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. ( 2002). A model of (often) mixed stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902.
12.
Fiske, A.P., & Tetlock, P.E. ( 1997). Taboo trade-offs: Reactions to transactions that transgress the spheres of justice. Political Psychology,18, 255-297.
13.
Fry, D.P. ( 2006). Reciprocity: The foundation stone of morality. In M. Killen & J. G. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 399-422). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14.
Gino, F., Ayal, S., & Ariely, D. ( 2009). Contagion and differentiation in unethical behavior. Psychological Science, 20, 393-398.
15.
Haidt, J. ( 2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814-834.
16.
Haidt, J., Rosenberg, E., & Hom, H. ( 2003). Differentiating diversity: Moral diversity is not like other kinds. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 1-36.
17.
Huo, Y.J., Smith, H.J., Tyler, T.R., & Lind, E.A. ( 1996). Superordinate identification, subgroup identification, and justice concerns. Is separatism the problem, is assimilation the answer?Psychological Science, 7, 40-45.
18.
Jetten, J., Postmes, T., & McAuliffe, B.J. (2002). "We’re all individuals": Group norms of individualism and collectivism, level of identification and identity threat. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 189-207.
19.
Judd, C.M., James-Hawkins, L., Yzerbyt, V., & Kashima, Y. ( 2005). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 899-913.
20.
Kim, P.H., Dirks, K.T., Cooper, C.D., & Ferrin, D.L. ( 2006). When more blame is better than less: The implications of internal vs. external attributions for the repair of trust after a competence- vs. integrity-based trust violation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99, 49-65.
21.
Killen, M., Margie, N.G., & Sinno, S. ( 2006). Morality in the context of intergroup relationships. In M. Killen & J. G. Smetana (Eds.). Handbook of moral development (pp. 155-183). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
22.
Leach, C.W., Ellemers, N., & Barreto, M. ( 2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of ingroups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 234-249.
23.
Mullen, E., & Skitka, L.J. ( 2006). Exploring the psychological underpinnings of the moral mandate effect: Motivated reasoning, group differentiation, or anger?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 629-643.
24.
Osswald, S., Greitemeyer, T., Fischer, D., & Frey, D. ( 2010). Moral prototypes and moral behavior: Specific effects on emotional precursors of moral behavior and on moral behavior by the activation of moral prototypes. European Journal of Social Psychology , 40, 1078-1904.
25.
Phalett, K., & Poppe, E. ( 1997). Competence and morality dimensions of national and ethnic stereotypes: A study in six eastern-European countries. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 703-723.
26.
Rink, F., & Ellemers, N. ( 2009). Temporary vs. permanent group membership: How the future prospects of newcomers affect newcomer acceptance and newcomer influence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 764-775.
27.
Rodriguez Mosquera, P.M., Manstead, A.S.R., & Fischer, A.H. ( 2002). The role of honour concerns in emotional reactions to offences. Cognition and Emotion, 16, 143-163.
28.
Schwartz, S.H. ( 1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1-65). New York, NY: Academic Press.
29.
Sherif, M. ( 1966). The psychology of social norms. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
30.
Skitka, L.J., Bauman, C.W., & Sargis, E.G. ( 2005). Moral conviction: Another contributor to attitude strength or something more? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 88, 895-917.
31.
Skitka, L.J., & Mullen, E. ( 2003). The dark side of moral conviction. Analysis of Social Issues and Public Policy, 2, 35-41.
32.
Skowronski, J.J., & Carlston, D.E. (1987). Social judgment and social memory: The role of cue diagnosticity in negativity, positivity, and extremity biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 689-699.
33.
Sleebos, E., Ellemers, N., & De Gilder, D. ( 2006). The carrot and the stick: Affective commitment and acceptance anxiety as motives for discretionary group efforts by respected and disrespected group members. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 32, 244-255.
34.
Smith, H.J., & Tyler, T.R. ( 1997). Choosing the right pond: The impact of group membership on self-esteem and group-oriented behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 146-170.
35.
Spears, R., Ellemers, N., & Doosje, B. ( 2005). Let me count the ways in which I respect thee: Does competence compensate or compromise lack of liking from the group? European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 263-280.
36.
Tafarodi, R.W., & Milne, A.B. ( 2002). Decomposing global self-esteem. Journal of Personality, 70, 443-483.
37.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. ( 1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
38.
Turiel, E. ( 1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and conventions . New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Turiel, E. ( 2006). Thought, emotions, and social interactional processes . In M. Killen & J. G. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 7-35). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
40.
Turner, J.C. ( 1991). Social influence. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
41.
Tyler, T.R., & Lind, A.E. ( 1992). A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 115-191.
42.
Van Lange, P.A.M., & Kuhlman, D.M. ( 1994). Social value orientations and impressions of a partner’s honesty and intelligence: A test of the might versus morality effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 126-141.
43.
Wainryb, C., Shaw, L.A., Laupa, M., & Smith, K.R. ( 2001). Children’s, adolescents’ and young adults’ thinking about different types of disagreements. Developmental Psychology, 37, 373-386.
44.
Wojciszke, B. ( 1994). Multiple meanings of behavior: Construing actions in terms of competence or morality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 222-232.
45.
Wojciszke, B. ( 2005). Morality and competence in person- and self-perception . European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 155-188.
