The Impact of Perceived Control on the Imagination of Better and Worse Possible Worlds

Abstract

Effects of perceived control and close alternative outcomes on counterfactual generation were examined. Subjects played a computer-simulated "wheel of fortune"game along with another player (a confederate) in which two wheels spun simultaneously. Subjects had either control over spinning the wheel or control over which wheel would determine their outcome and which would determine the other player's outcome. Subjects experienced either a "near big win, " with a loss by the other player, or a "near loss, " with a big win by the other player. Results showed that (a) subjects generated counterfactuals about the aspect of the game they controlled, (b) the direction of these counterfactuals corresponded to the close outcome associated with the aspect they controlled, and (c) these counterfactuals predicted affective responses to the outcome of the spin. Cognitive and motivational implications of the influence of perceived control on counterfactual generation are discussed.

References

Ajzen, I. , & Madden, T. J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 453-474.

Bond, C. F., Jr. (1985). The next-in-line effect: Encoding or retrieval deficit Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 853-862.

Brenner, M. (1973). The next-in-line effect. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 320-323.

Brickman, P. , Rabinowitz, V. C. , Karuza, J., Jr. , Coates, D. , Cohn, E. , & Kidder, L. (1982). Models of helping and coping. American Psychologist, 37, 368-384.

Gilovich, T. , & Douglas, C. (1986). Biased evaluations of randomly determined gambling outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 228-241.

Girotto, V. , Legrenzi, P. , & Rizzo, A. (1991). Event controllability in counterfactual thinking. Acta Psychological, 78, 111-133.

Greenwald, A. G. , & Banaji, M. R. (1989). The self as a memory system: Powerful but ordinary. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 41-54.

Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.

Johnson, J. T. (1986). The knowledge of what might have been: Affective and attributional consequences of near outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 51-62.

10.

Kahneman, D. , & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136-153.

11.

Kahneman, D. , & Tversky, A. (1982). The simulation heuristic. In D. Kahneman , P. Slovic , & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 201-208). New York: Cambridge University Press.

12.

Kahneman, D. , & Varey, C. A. (1990). Propensities and counterfactuals: The loser that almost won.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1101-1110.

13.

Landman, J. (1987). Regret and elation following action and inaction: Affective responses to positive and negative outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 524-536.

14.

Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 311-328.

15.

Markman, K. D. , Gavanski, I. , Sherman, S. J. , & McMullen, M. N. (1993). The mental simulation of better and worse possible worlds. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 87-109.

16.

Roese, N. J. (1994). The functional basis of counterfactual thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 805-818.

17.

Roese, N. J. , & Olson, J. M. (1995). Outcome controllabililty and counterfactual thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 620-628.

18.

Ross, M. , & Sicoly, F. (1979). Egocentric biases in availability and attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 322-337.

19.

Slamecka, N. J. , & Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 592-604.

20.

Taylor, S. E. , & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193-210.

21.

Taylor, S. E. , Lichtman, R. R. , & Wood, J. V. (1984). Attributions, beliefs about control, and adjustment to breast cancer.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 489-502.

22.

Testa, M. , & Major, B. (1990). The impact of social comparisons after failure: The moderating effects of perceived control. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 11, 205-218.

23.

Thompson, S. C. (1981). Will it hurt less if I can control it? A complex answer to a simple question. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 89-101.

24.

Wells, G. L. , & Gavanski, I. (1989). Mental simulation of causality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 161-169.