The works of Lewis and Girard share several central interests but seem divided by opposite views of myth. Lewis' novelistic retelling of the myth of Cupid and Psyche, however, provides a bridge: It depicts an ancient society organized around sacrifice and myth as understood in Girard's cultural theory and tells a Girardian story of conversion, in which the narrator discovers the imitative and rivalrous nature of her desire. Her rivalry and reconciliation with the story's true god carries the novel beyond Girardian myth to a contrary kind of narrative identified with fairy stories, which can extend Girard's approach to Christian conversion.
References
1.
CalinWilliam. The Twentieth-Century Humanist Critics: From Spitzer to Frye. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 2007.
2.
CookEleanor. Enigmas and Riddles in Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2006.
3.
DonaldsonMara E.Holy Places Are Dark Places: C. S. Lewis and Paul Ricoeur on Narrative Transformation. Lanham, MD: UP of America, 1988.
4.
DoranRobert. “Editor's Introduction: Literature as Theory.” Introduction. Mimesis and Theory. By GirardRené. xi–xxvi.
5.
FarrerAustin. “The Christian Apologist.”Light on C. S. Lewis. Ed. GibbJocelyn. New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1965.
6.
GirardRené.Battling to the End: Conversations with Benoît Chantre. Trans. BakerMary. East Lansing: Michigan State UP, 2010.
7.
GirardRené.“Conversion in Literature and Christianity.”Mimesis and Theory263–73.
8.
GirardRené.Deceit, Desire, and the Novel: Self and Other in Literary Structure. Trans. FrecceroYvonne. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins, 1965.
9.
GirardRené.“Epilogue: The Anthropology of the Cross: A Conversation with René Girard.”The Girard Reader. Ed. WilliamsJames G., New York: Crossroad, 1996. 262–88.
10.
GirardRené.I See Satan Fall Like Lightning. Trans. WilliamsJames G., New York: Orbis, 2001.
11.
GirardRené.Mimesis and Theory: Essays on Literature and Criticism, 1953–2005. Ed. DoranRobert. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2008.
MackseyRichardDonatoEugenio, eds. The Structuralist Controversy: The Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man. 1970. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1972.
30.
MilbankJohn. “Fictioning Things: Gift and Narrative.”Religion & Literature37.3 (2005): 1–35.
31.
MyersDoris T.Bareface: A Guide to C. S. Lewis's Last Novel. Columbia: U of Missouri P, 2004.
32.
PanayotakisCostas. “Vision and Light in Apuleius' Tale of Psyche and Her Mysterious Husband.”Classical Quarterly51.2 (2001): 576–83.
33.
SchakelPeter J.Reason and Imagination in C. S. Lewis: A Study of Till We Have Faces. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1984.
34.
SchakelPeter J.“Till We Have Faces.” The Cambridge Companion to C. S. Lewis. Eds. MacSwainRobertWardMichael. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2010. 281–93.
35.
SchrockChad. “A Myth of Hubris in Till We Have Faces.”VII: An Anglo-American Literary Review25 (2008):13–32.
36.
StruckPeter T.Birth of the Symbol: Ancient Readers at the Limits of Their Texts. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2004.
37.
TolkienJ. R. R.“On Fairy-Stories.”The Monsters and the Critics and Other Essays. Ed. TolkienChristopher. 1983. London: HarperCollins, 1997. 109–61.
38.
WilliamsCharles. “The Way of Exchange.”The Image of the City and Other Essays. Ed. RidlerAnne. London: Oxford UP, 1958. 147–54.
