This study examines the effects of diversity faultlines stemming from educational
background and conscientiousness on team decision quality and social integration and
the moderating role of team task autonomy. Using a 2 × 2 (Weak/Strong Faultlines ×
Low/High Team Task Autonomy) factorial design, 52 four-person teams performed a
decision-making task. Diverse weak-faultline teams performed better and reported
higher levels of social integration than did strong-faultline teams. Team task
autonomy moderated these effects, showing that the differences become significant
only under high autonomy conditions. Implications for team diversity research and
design and management of work teams are discussed.
Allison, P. D.1978. Measures of inequality.
American Sociological Review, 43:
865-880.
2.
Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F.1992. Demography and design: Predictors of new product
team performance. Organization Science,
3: 321-341.
3.
Antonioni, D., & Park, H.2001. The effects of personality similarity on peer
ratings of contextual work behaviors. Personnel
Psychology, 54:
331-360.
4.
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K.1991. The big five personality dimensions and job
performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel
Psychology, 44:
1-26.
5.
Bezrukova, K., Thatcher, S. M. B., & Jehn, K. in press. Group heterogeneity and faultlines: Comparing
alignment and dispersion theories of group composition. In L. Thompson & K. Behfar (Eds.), Conflict in Teams. Evanston,
IL: Northwestern University
Press.
6.
Blau, P.1977. Inequality and composition: A primitive theory of social
structure. New York: Free
Press.
7.
Breaugh, J. A.1985. The measurement of work autonomy.
Human Relations, 38:
551-570.
8.
Brewer, M. B.1996. Managing diversity: The role of social
identities. In S. E. Jackson & M. N. Ruderman (Eds.), Diversity in work teams: Research paradigms for a changing
workplace: 47-68.
Washington, DC: American
Psychological Association.
9.
Brewer, M. B., & Miller, N.1984. Beyond the contact hypothesis: Theoretical
perspectives on desegregation. In N. Miller & M. B. Brewer (Eds.), Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation:
281-302. New York:
Academic Press.
10.
Byrne, D.1971. The attraction paradigm. New
York: Academic
Press.
11.
Campion, M. A., Papper, E. M., & Medsker, G. J.1996. Relations between work team characteristics and
effectiveness: A replication and extension. Personnel
Psychology, 49:
429-452.
12.
Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E.1997. What makes teams work? Group effectiveness research
from the shop floor to the executive suit. Journal of
Management, 23:
239-290.
13.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R.1992. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO
Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual.
Odessa, FL: Psychological
Assessment Resources.
14.
Dudley, N., Orvis, K., Lebiecki, J., & Cortina, J.2006. A meta-analytic investigation of conscientiousness
in the prediction of job performance: Examining the intercorrelations and the
incremental validity of narrow traits. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 91(1),
40-57.
15.
Evans, B. K., & Fischer, D. G.1992. A hierarchical model of participatory
decision-making, job autonomy, and perceived control.
Human Relations, 45:
1169-1189.
16.
Fiedler, K., Schenck, W., Watling, M., & Menges, J. I.2005. Priming trait inferences through pictures and
moving pictures: The impact of open and closed mindsets.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
88: 229-244.
17.
Gibson, C. B., & Vermeulen, F.2003. A healthy divide: Subgroups as stimulus for team
learning behavior. Administrative Science
Quarterly, 48:
202-239.
18.
Gladstein, D. L.1984. Groups in context: A model of task group
effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly,
29: 499-517.
19.
Gruenfeld, D. H., & Hollingshead, A. B.1993. Sociocognition in work groups: The evolution of
group integrative complexity and its relation to task performance.
Small Group Research, 24(3):
383-405.
20.
Halfhill, T., Nielsen, T. M., Sundstrom, E., & Weilbaecher, A.2005. Group personality composition and performance in
military service teams. Military Psychology,
17, 39-53.
21.
Harrison, D., Price, K. H., Gavin, J. H., & Florey, A. T.2002. Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects
of surface and deep-level diversity on group functioning.
Academy of Management Journal, 45:
1029-1045.
22.
Jackson, S. E.1996. The consequences of diversity in multidisciplinary
work teams. In M. A. West (Ed.), The psychology of groups at work:
53-76. Chichester,
UK: John Wiley &
Sons.
23.
Jackson, S. E., & Joshi, A.2004. Diversity in social context: A multi-attribute,
multi-level analysis of team diversity and performance.
Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25:
675-702.
24.
Jackson, S. E., Joshi, A., & Erhardt, N. L.2003. Recent research on teams and organizational
diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. Journal of
Management, 29:
801-830.
25.
Jehn, K. A.1995. A multimethod examination of the benefits and
detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science
Quarterly, 40:
256-282.
26.
Jehn, K. A., & Bezrukova, K.2004. A field study of group diversity, group context,
and performance. Journal of Organizational
Behavior, 25:
1-27.
27.
Jehn, K., Neale, M., & Northcraft, G.1999. Why differences make a difference: A field study of
diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 44:
741-763.
28.
Kochan, T., Bezrukova, K., Ely, R., Jackson, S., Joshi, A., Jehn, K., Leonard, J., Levine, D., & Thomas, D.2003. The effect of diversity on business performance:
Report of the diversity research network. Human Resources
Management, 42:
3-21.
29.
Kozlowski, S. W. J., Gully, S. M., Nason, E. R., & Smith, E. M.1999. Developing adaptive teams: A theory of compilation
and performance across levels and time. In D. R. Ilgen & E. D. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of work performance: Implications for
staffing, personnel actions, and development:
240-292. San
Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
30.
Kozlowski, S. W., & Klein, K. J.2000. A multilevel approach to theory and research in
organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In
K. J. Klein and S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations:
Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp.
3-90). San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
31.
Langfred, C. W.2005. Autonomy and performance in teams: The multilevel
moderating effect of task interdependence. Journal of
Management, 31:
513-529.
32.
Langfred, C. W., & Moye, N. A.2004. Effects of task autonomy on performance: An
extended model considering motivational, informational and structural
mechanisms. Journal of Applied Psychology,
89: 934-945.
33.
Lau, D., & Murnighan, J. K.1998. Demographic diversity and faultlines: The
compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy
of Management Review, 23:
325-340.
34.
Lau, D., & Murnighan, J. K.2005. Interactions within groups and subgroups: The
effects of demographic faultlines. Academy of Management
Journal, 48:
645-659.
35.
Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L.1990. Progress in small group research.
Annual Review of Psychology, 41:
585-634.
36.
Li, J. T., & Hambrick, D. C.2005. Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic
faultlines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams.
Academy of Management Journal,
48(5):
794-813.
37.
Lievens, F., De Fruyt, F., & Van Dam, K.2001. Assessors’ use of personality traits in
descriptions of assessment centre candidates: A five-factor model
perspective. Journal of Occupational and Organizational
Psychology, 74:
623-636.
38.
Maass, A., Colombo, A., Colombo, A., & Sherman, S. J.2001. Inferring traits from behaviors and behaviors from
traits: The induction-deduction asymmetry. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 81:
391-404.
39.
Marcus-Newhall, A., Miller, N., Holtz, R., & Brewer, M. B.1993. Cross-cutting category membership with role
assignment: A means of reducing intergroup bias. British
Journal of Social Psychology, 32:
125-146.
40.
McGrath, J. E.1984. Groups: Interaction and performance.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice
Hall.
41.
McGrath, J. E.1998. A view of group composition through a
group-theoretic lens. In M. A. Neale, E. A. Mannix, & D. H. Gruenfeld (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams:
255-272. Stanford,
CT: JAI.
42.
Michel, J., & Hambrick, D.1992. Diversification posture and the characteristics of
the top management team. Academy of Management
Journal, 35: 9-37
43.
Milliken, F., & Martins, L.1996. Searching for common threads: Understanding the
multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups.
Academy of Management Review, 21:
402-433.
44.
Mohammed, S., & Angell, L.2003. Personality heterogeneity in teams: Which
differences make a difference for team performance?Small Group Research, 34(6),
651-677.
45.
Mohrman, S. A., Cohen, S. G., & Mohrman, A. M.1995. Designing team-based organizations.
San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
46.
Molleman, E.2000. The modalities of self-management: The “must,”
“may,” “can” and “will” of local decision making. The
International Journal of Operations and Production Management,
20: 889-910.
47.
Molleman, E.2005. Diversity in demographic characteristics, abilities
and personality traits: Do faultlines affect team functioning?Group Decision and Negotiation, 14:
173-193.
48.
Molleman, E., Nauta, A., & Jehn, K. E.2004. Person-job fit applied to teamwork: a multi-level
approach. Small Group Research,
36: 515-539.
49.
Montoya-Weiss, M. M., Massey, A. P., & Song, M.2001. Getting it together: Temporal coordination and
conflict management in global virtual teams. Academy of
Management Journal, 44:
1251-1262.
50.
Neuman, G. A., Wagner, S., & Christiansen, N.1999. The relationship between workteam personality
composition and the job performance of teams. Group and
Organizational Management, 24(1),
28-45.
51.
O’Reilly, C. A., Caldwell, D., & Barnett, W.1989. Work group demography, social integration, and
turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly,
34: 21-37.
52.
Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R.1999. Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group
diversity, conflict and performance. Administrative
Science Quarterly, 44:
1-28.
53.
Simons, T.1995. Top management team consensus, heterogeneity, and
debate as contingent predictors of company performance: The complimentarity of
group structure and process. Academy of Management Best
Papers Proceedings: 62-66.
54.
Simons, T., Pelled, L. H., & Smith, K. A.1999. Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and
decision comprehensiveness in top management teams.
Academy of Management Journal, 42:
662-673.
55.
Stokes, J. P.1983. Components of group cohesion: Intermember
attraction, instrumental value, and risk taking. Small
Group Behavior, 14:
163-173.
56.
Tajfel, H.1978. Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the
social psychology of intergroup relations.
London: Academic
Press.
57.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C.1986. The social identity theory of intergroup
behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations:
7-24. Chicago:
Nelson-Hall.
58.
Thatcher, S. M. B., Jehn, K. A., & Zanutto, E.2003. Cracks in diversity research: The effects of
faultlines on conflict and performance. Group Decision and
Negotiation, 12:
217-241.
59.
Tjosvold, D., Hui, C., Ding, D. Z., & Hu, J.2003. Conflict values and team relationships: Conflict’s
contribution to team effectiveness and citizenship in China.
Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24:
69-88.
60.
Todorov, A., & Uleman, J. S.2004. The person reference process in spontaneous trait
inferences. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 87:
482-493.
61.
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S.1987. Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization
theory. Oxford, UK:
Blackwell.
62.
Van der Vegt, G. S., & Bunderson, J. S.2005. Learning and performance in multi-functional teams:
The importance of collective team identification. Academy
of Management Journal, 48:
532-547.
63.
Van der Vegt, G. S., & Van de Vliert, E.2005. Effects of perceived skill dissimilarity and task
interdependence on helping in work teams. Journal of
Management, 31:
73-89.
64.
Van der Vegt, G. S., Van de Vliert, E., & Oosterhof, A.2003. Informational dissimilarity and organizational
citizenship behavior: The role of intrateam interdependence and team
identification. Academy of Management Journal,
46: 715-727.
65.
Van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K., & Homan, A.2004. Work group diversity and group performance: An
integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 89:
1008-1022.
66.
Webber, S. S., & Donahue, L. M.2001. Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on
work group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis.
Journal of Management, 27(2),
141-162.
67.
Wiersema, M., & Bantel, K.1992. Top management team demography and corporate
strategic change. Academy of Management Journal,
35: 91-121.
68.
Williams, K., & O’Reilly, C. A.1998. Demography and diversity in organizations: A review
of 40 years of research. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior:
77-140. Oxford, UK:
Elsevier.
69.
Wong, S. 2003. Collective cognition in teams: The role of interactive
learning and effects on team performance. Paper presented at the
63rd Meeting of the Academy of Management,
Seattle, WA.
