When One Size Does Not Fit All—The Special Challenges of Accountability Testing for Students with Disabilities

Aleman S. (1995, March) Special education: Issues in the state grant program of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service of the Library of Congress.

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education (AERA/APA/NCME). (1999). Standards on educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

Americans with Disabilities Act. Pub. L. No. 101-336, 42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq. (1990).

Baker E. , and Linn R. (2004). Validity issues for accountability systems. In Fuhrman S. , and Elmore R. (Eds.), Redesigning accountability systems for education (pp. 47—72). New York: Teachers College Press.

Center on Education Policy. (2004). State high school exit exams: A maturing reform. Washington, DC: Author.

Children's Defense Fund. (1974). Children out of school in America. Washington, DC: Author.

Debra P. v. Turlington. 474 F. Supp. 244 (M.D. Fla. 1979), aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 644 F.2d 397 (5th Cir. 1981), on remand, 564 F. Supp. 177 (M.D. Fla. 1983), aff'd, 730 F.2d 1405 (11th Cir. 1984).

Driscoll D. (2004, July 6). MCAS participation by students with significant disabilities, a memorandum to Directors of Approved Private Special Education Schools. Retrieved August 13, 2004, from http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/alt

Education for All Disabled children Act of 1975, Pub. L. No. 94-142, 89 Stat. 773 (1975).

Education Week. (2004, January 8). Special education in an era of standards: Count me in. (Quality Counts 2004 Supp.). Retrieved from http://counts.edweek.org/sreports/qc04/

Elmore R. (2004). School reform from the inside out: Policy, practice, and performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

Elliott S. N. , Kratochwill T. R. , and McKevitt B. B. (2001). Experimental analysis of the effects of testing accommodations on the scores of students with and without disabilities. Journal of School Psychology, 39(2), 3—24.

Fuchs L. , and Fuchs D. (1999, November). Fair and unfair testing accommodations. The School Administrator, 56(10), 24—30.

Gartner A. , and Lipsky D. (1987). Beyond special education: Toward a system for all students. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 367—395.

Haertel E. , and Lorie W. (2004). Validating standards-based test score interpretations. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2(20), 61—103.

Haney W. (2000). The myth of the Texas miracle in education. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(41). Retrieved January 12, 2005, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n41/

Hehir T. , and Gamm S. (1999). Special education: From legalism to collaboration. In and and Heubert J. (Ed.), Law and school reform: Six strategies for promoting educational equity (pp. 205—243). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Heubert J. (2004). High-stakes testing in a changing environment: Disparate impact, opportunity to learn, and current legal protections. In Fuhrman S. , and Elmore R. (Eds.), Redesigning accountability systems for education (pp. 220—242). New York: Teachers College Press.

Heubert J. , and Hauser R. (Eds.). (1999). High stakes: Testing for tracking, promotion, and graduation. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Hill R. (2001). The impact of including special education students in accountability systems. Dover, NH: National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment, Inc. Retrieved August 25, 2004, from http://www.nciea.org

Holbrook P. (2001). When bad things happen to good children: A special educator's views of MCAS. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(10), 781—785.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). 20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq., as amended by Public Law 108-446. (1975/2004).

Jennings J. (2001). A timely IDEA: Rethinking federal education programs for children with disabilities. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy. Retrieved August, 2004, from http://www.cep-dc.org

Johnstone C. J. (2003). Improving validity of large-scale tests: Universal design and student performance (Technical Report 37). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved January 1, 2005, from http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/Technical37.htm

Karger J. , and Pullin D. (2002, June). Exit documents and students with disabilities: Legal issues. College Park: Education Policy Reform Research Institute, The University of Maryland.

Koenig J. A. , and Bachman L. F. (Eds.). (2004). Keeping score for all: The effects of inclusion and accommodation policies on large-scale educational assessments. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Koretz D. , and Barton K. (2003-2004). Assessing students with disabilities: Issues and evidence. Educational Assessment, 9(1&2), 29—60.

Kornhauber M. (2004, January and March). Appropriate and inappropriate forms of testing, assessment, and accountability. Educational Policy, 18(1), 45—70.

Kyle S. , Papadopoulou E. , and McLaughlin M. (2004, September). Accountability for all: Results from a study on accountability policies affecting students with disabilities educated in special schools and settings. College Park: Educational Policy Reform Research Institute (EPPRI), Institute for the Study of Exceptional Children, University of Maryland.

Lang S. , Kumke P. , Cowell E. , and Ray C. (2003, April). The consequences of using testing accommodations: Student, teacher, and parent reactions to and perceptions of testing accommodations. Madison: Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin at Madison. WCER Working Paper 2003-3. Retrieved August 28, 2004, from http://www.wcer.wics.edu/publications

Lehr C. , and Thurlow M. (2003). Putting it all together: Including students with disabilities in assessment and accountability systems (Policy Directions 16). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved August 20, 2004, from http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/Policy16.htm

Linn R. (2003, Winter). Requirements for measuring adequate yearly progress. National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST). Policy Brief 6. Los Angeles: CRESST.

Massachusetts Department of Education (2002, February). Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System: Concerns and questions about alternate assessment. Malden, MA: Author.

Massachusetts Department of Education. (2004). Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System: MCAS results, 2004. Malden, MA: Author.

McLaughlin M. , Artiles A. , and Pullin D. (2001, November). Challenges for the transformation of special education in the 21st century: Rethinking culture in school reform. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 14(2), 51—62.

Minnema J. , Thurlow M. , and Warren S. H. (2004). Understanding out-of-level testing in local schools: A first case study of policy implementation and effects (Out-of-Level Testing Project Report 11). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved January 1, 2005, from http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/OOLT11.html

Minnema J. E. , Thurlow M. L. , Moen R. E. , and VanGetson G. R. (2004). States’ procedures for ensuring out-of-level test instrument quality (Out-of-Level Testing Project Report 14). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved January 1, 2005, from http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/OOLT14.html

Minow M. (1990). Making all the difference: Inclusion, exclusion, and American law. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Nagle K. , and Crawford J. (2004, April). Opportunities and challenges: Perspectives on NCLBA from special education directors in urban school districts. College Park: Educational Policy Reform Research Institute (EPPRI), Institute for the Study of Exceptional Children and Youth, University of Maryland.

National Research Council (NRC). (1997). Educating one and all: Students with disabilities and standards-based reform. L. McDonnell, M. McLaughlin, & P. Morison (Eds.). Committee on Goals 2000 and the Inclusion of Students with Disabilities, National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

National Research Council (NRC). (2002). Minority students in special and gifted education. M.S. Donovan & C. Cross (Eds.). Committee on Minority Representation in Special Education, National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science.

Nelhaus J. (2004, June). One state's approach to holding students to a common standard for high school graduation and addressing the AERA/APA/NCME standards. Paper presented at the annual Large-Scale Assessment Conference of the Council of Chief State School Officers, Boston, MA.

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).

Pitoniak M. J. , and Royer J. M. (2001, Spring). Testing accommodations for examinees with disabilities: A review of psychometric, legal, social, and policy issues. Review of Educational Research, 71(1), 53—104.

Pullin D. (1999). Whose schools are these and what are they for? The role of the rule of law in defining educational opportunity in American public education. In and and Cizek G.J. (Ed.), Handbook of educational policy (pp. 3—29). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Pullin D. (2002). Testing individuals with disabilities: Reconciling social science and social policy. In Committee on Disabilities, American Psychological Association (Eds.), Assessing individuals with disabilities in educational, employment, and clinical settings (pp. 11—31). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Quenemoen R. , Rigney S. , and Thurlow M. (2002). Use of alternate assessment results in reporting and accountability systems: Conditions for use based on research and practice (Synthesis Report 43). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved August 20, 2004, from http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/Synthesis43.html

Quenemoen R. , Thompson S. , and Thurlow M. (2003). Measuring academic achievement of students with significant cognitive disabilities: Building understanding of alternate assessment scoring criteria (Synthesis Report 50). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved August 20, 2004, from http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/Synthesis50.html

Rehabilitation Act. (1973). 20 U.S.C. 794.

Schworm P. (2004). MCAS detour proves tough. The Boston Globe, July 12, pp. B–1, B-4.

Singer J. , and Butler J. (1987, May). The Education for All Handicapped Children Act: Schools as agents of social reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(2), 125—152.

Thompson S. J. , Johnstone C. J. , Thurlow M. L. , and Clapper A. T. (2004). State literacy standards, practice, and testing: Exploring accessibility (Technical Report 38). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved January 1, 2005, from http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/Technical38.htm

Thompson S. , and Thurlow M. (2003). State special education outcomes: Marching on. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved January 3, 2005, from http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/2003StateReport.htm./

Thurlow M. (2004). Biting the bullet: Including special-needs students in accountability systems. In Fuhrman S. , and Elmore R. (Eds.), Redesigning accountability systems for education (pp. 115—137). New York: Teachers College Press.

Thurlow M. , Elliott J. , and Ysseldyke J. (2003). Testing students with disabilities: Practical strategies for complying with district and state requirements (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Thurlow M. , Quenemoen R. , Thompson S. , and Lehr C. (2001). Principles and characteristics of inclusive assessment and accountability systems (Synthesis Report 40). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved August 24, 2004, from http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/Synthesis40.html

Thurlow M. L. , and Wiley H. I. (2004). Almost there in public reporting of assessment results for students with disabilities (Technical Report 39). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved January 1, 2005, from http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/Technical39.htm

Turnbull H. (1993). Free appropriate public education: The law and children with disabilities (3rd ed.). Denver, CO: Love Publishing Company.

U.S. Department of Education. (2000). Twenty-second annual report to the Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.

U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Twenty-fourth annual report to the Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.

U.S. Department of Education. (2003a). Title I–Improving the academic achievement of the disadvantaged; Part II; Final rule. 68 Fed. Reg. 68698 (2003) (codified at 34 CFR Part 200)

U.S. Department of Education. (2003b).Title I–Improving the academic achievement of the disadvantaged, background. 68 Fed. Reg. 69698.

U.S. Department of Education. (2004, March 2). Letter to chief state school officers regarding inclusion of students with disabilities in state accountability systems. Retrieved January 23, 2005, from http://www.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/csso030204.html

U.S. Department of Education. (2005, April 7). Raising achievement: Alternate assessment for students with disabilities. Retrieved April 15, 2005, from http://www.ed.gov/print/policy/elsec/guid/raising/alt-ass-long/htm

VanGetson G. , Minnema J. , and Thurlow M. (2004). Rapid changes, repeated challenges: States’ out-of-level testing policies for 2003–2004 (Out-of-Level Testing Project Report 13). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved January 1, 2005, from http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/Online-Pubs/OOLT13.html

Weintraub F. , Abeson A. , and Braddock D. (1972). State law and education of handicapped children: Issues and recommendations. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.

Wiener D. (2002). Massachusetts: One state's approach to setting performance levels on the alternate assessment (Synthesis Report 48). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved January 7, 2005, from http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/Synthesis48.html

Wilson S. (2004). Opening Pandora's Box: The human side of validation. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2(2), 125—128.

Ysseldyke J. , Dennison A. , and Nelson R. (2004). Large-scale assessment and accountability systems: Positive consequences for students with disabilities (Synthesis Report 51). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved January 1, 2005, from http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/Synthesis51.html

Zatta M. , and Pullin D. (2004, April). Education and alternate assessment for students with significant cognitive disabilities: Implications for educators. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(16), 1—27.