Professional Development of Teachers for Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: A Knowledge-Building Approach

Abstract

Background

This study was situated in Singapore, which aims to achieve engaged learning in P–12 schools with the use of educational technology. One of the foci of study among Singaporean educational researchers on a computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environment that emphasizes collaboration among learners for the co-construction of knowledge. Although there is some evidence that CSCL enhances students’ learning, an identified gap in the field of CSCL is documented accounts of how knowledge building happens. Knowledge of how to facilitate sustained and in-depth knowledge-building discourse among teachers has also been identified as a gap in understanding in teacher education.

Purpose

This case study aims to gain insights into how negotiation and co-construction of knowledge occurs among eachers during their participation in a knowledge-building community.

Participants

It involves 7 Singaporean teachers who enrolled in an 18-month Advanced Diploma program.

Intervention

Three consecutive modules were conducted to develop the participants’ competencies in and dispositions toward facilitating student-centered learning in a computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environment. The modules engaged the teachers as coc-onstructors of knowledge in a knowledge-building community.

Research Design

This is a case study in which the first author, as a participant observer, acted as the facilitator for the modules.

Data Analysis

The main source of data was the teachers’ notes in Knowledge Forum, a CSCL environment. The teachers’ patterns of online interactions were analyzed through social network analysis and the interaction analysis model (IAM).

Findings

Our findings indicate that the teachers formed a socially cohesive community and participated rather actively, writing an average of 3.7 notes and 425 words per week. Further analysis of the notes using IAM shows a healthy distribution of notes at various phases of knowledge construction.

Conclusion

We conclude that the teacher knowledge-building community was successful in engaging the teachers in collaborative knowledge building, leading to a deep understanding among them about learning in a CSCL environment. We suggest the following factors as contributors to this advancement: (1) having a group of committed teachers as participants, (2) engaging the teachers to work on authentic problems faced in schools, (3) empowering the teachers with the agency to solve problems and reflect on their learning, (4) allocating adequate time for teachers to link theories to practice and to reflect on their implementation, and (5) having a facilitator who is experienced in facilitating this form of learning and in using a pedagogical model that is built on appropriate learning theories.

References

Arvaja

Häkkinen

Rasku-Puttonen

, & Eteläpelto

(2002). Social processes and knowledge building during a small group interaction in a school science project. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 46, 161—179.

Ball

D. L.

, & Cohen

D. K.

(1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In Darling-Hammond

, & Sykes

(Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3—32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Bereiter

, & Scardamalia

(2006). Education for the Knowledge Age. In Alexander

P. A.

, & Winne

P. H.

(Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 695—713). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Bransford

J. D.

Brown

A. L.

, & Cocking

R. R.

(Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.

Burtis

P. J.

(1998). The Analytic Toolkit [Computer software]. Toronto: Knowledge Building Research Team, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto.

Butler

D. L.

Lauscher

H. N.

Jarvis-Selinger

, & Beckingham

(2004). Collaboration and self-regulation in teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 435—455.

Chai

C. S.

, & Khine

M. S.

(2006). An analysis of interaction and participation patterns in an online learning community. Journal of Education Technology and Society, 9, 250—261.

Chai

C. S.

, & Merry

(2006). Teachers’ perceptions of teaching and learning in a knowledge building community: An exploratory case study. Learning, Media and Technology, 31, 133—148.

Cochran-Smith

, & Lytle

(1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in community. Review of Research in Education, 24, 249—305.

10.

Darling-Hammond

(1996). The quiet revolution: Rethinking teacher development. Educational Leadership, 53 6, 4—10.

11.

Day

, & Sachs

(2004). Professionalism, performativity, and empowerment: Discourse in the politics, policies and purposes of continuing professional development. In Day

, & Sachs

(Eds.), International handbook on continuing professional development of teachers (pp. 3—33). Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.

12.

Denzin

N. K.

(2000). The practices and politics of interpretation. In Denzin

N. K.

, & Lincoln

Y. S.

(Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 897—992). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

13.

Earle

R. S.

(2002). The integration of instructional technology into public education: Promises and challenges. Educational Technology, 42 1, 5—13.

14.

Ertmer

P. A.

(1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 47 4, 47—61.

15.

Ertmer

P. A.

(2003). Transforming teacher education: Visions and strategies. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 51 1, 124—128.

16.

Garrison

D. R.

Anderson

, & Archer

(2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15, 7—23.

17.

Gilbert

N. J.

, & Driscoll

M. P.

(2002). Collaborative knowledge building: A case study. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 50 1, 59—79.

18.

Grossman

Wineburg

, & Woolworth

(2001). Toward a theory of teacher community. Teachers College Record, 103, 942—1012.

19.

Gunawardena

Lowe

, & Anderson

(1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17, 397—431.

20.

Guzdial

, & Turns

(2000). Effective discussion through computer-mediated anchored forum. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 437—469.

21.

Hall

G. E.

, & Hord

S. M.

(2001). Implementing change: Patterns, principles and potholes. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

22.

Hara

Bonk

C. J.

, & Angeli

(2000). Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course. Instructional Science, 28, 115—152.

23.

Harasim

(2000). Shift happens: Online education as a new paradigm in learning. Internet and Higher Education, 3, 41—61.

24.

Hendriks

, & Maor

(2004). Quality of students’ communicative strategies delivered through computer-mediated communications. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 15, 5—32.

25.

Henri

(1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In Kaye

A. R.

(Ed.), Collaborative learning through computer conferencing (pp. 117—136). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.

26.

Hewitt

(1996). Progress toward a knowledge-building community. Dissertation Abstracts International, 57 (8), 3465. (UMI No. AAT NN11743)

27.

Hewitt

(2001). From focus on task to focus on understanding: The cultural transformation of a Toronto classroom. In Koschmann

Halls

, & Miyake

(Eds.), CSCL 2: Carrying forward the conversation (pp. 11—42). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

28.

Hübscher-Younger

, & Narayanan

N. H.

(2003). Authority and convergence in collaborative learning. Computers and Education, 41, 313—334.

29.

Wong

Cheah

H. M.

Wong

, & D'Rozario

(2004). Effectiveness of NIE's IT teacher training program: Have we prepared them enough? (Academic Research Fund Report 18/01). Singapore: Nanyang Technological University.

30.

Jin

S. H.

(2005). Analyzing student-student and student-instructor interaction through multiple communication tools in web-based learning. International Journal of Instructional Media, 32, 59—67.

31.

Kelchtermans

(2004). CPD for professional renewal: Moving beyond knowledge for practice. In Day

, & Sachs

(Eds.), International handbook on the continuing professional development of teachers (pp. 217—238). Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.

32.

Khine

M. S.

Yeap

L. L.

, & Tan

C. L.

(2003). The quality of message ideas, thinking and interaction in an asynchronous CMC environment. Education Media International, 40, 115—126.

33.

King

K. P.

(2002). Educational technology professional development as transformative learning opportunities. Computers and Education, 39, 283—297.

34.

Kreijns

Kirschner

P. A.

, & Jochems

(2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 335—353.

35.

Kwakman

(2003). Factors affecting teachers’ participation in professional learning activities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 149—170.

36.

Laat

, & Lally

(2003). Complexity, theory and praxis: Researching collaborative learning and tutoring processes in a networked learning community. Instructional Science, 31, 7—39.

37.

Leggett

W. P.

, & Persichitte

K. A.

(1998). Blood, sweat, and tears: 50 years of technology implementation obstacles. Techtrends, 43 3, 33—36.

38.

(2004). Knowledge building community: Keys for using online forums. Techtrends, 48 4, 24—28.

39.

Lipponen

Hakkarainen

, & Paavola

(2004). Practices and orientations of CSCL. In Strijbos

J. W.

Kirschner

P. A.

, & Martens

R. L.

(Eds.), What we know about CSCL and implementing it in higher education (pp. 34—50). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

40.

Lipponen

Rahikainen

Lallimo

, & Hakkarainen

(2003). Patterns of participation and discourse in elementary students’ computer-supported collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction, 13, 487—509.

41.

Marra

Moore

, & Klimczak

(2004). Content analysis of online discussion forums: A comparative analysis of protocols. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52, 23—40.

42.

Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2002). Masterplan II for IT in Education. Retrieved July 25, 2003, from http://www.moe.gov.sg/edumall/mp2/mp2.htm

43.

Miyake

, & Koschmann

(2001). Realizations of CSCL conversations: Technology transfer and the CSILE project. In Koschmann

Halls

, & Miyake

(Eds.), CSCL 2: Carrying forward the conversation (pp. 1—10). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

44.

Pelgrum

W. J.

(2001). Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: Results from a worldwide educational assessment. Computers and Education, 37, 163—178.

45.

Poole

D. M.

(2000). Student participation in a discussion-oriented online courses: A case study. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33, 162—177.

46.

Randi

, & Corno

(1997). Teachers as innovators. In Biddle

B. J.

Good

T. L.

, & Goodson

I. F.

(Eds.), International handbook of teachers and teaching (pp. 1163—1221). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

47.

Reiman

A. J.

(1999). The evolution of the social role taking and guided reflection framework in teacher education: Recent theory and quantitative synthesis of research. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 597—612.

48.

Rokeach

(1968). Beliefs, attitudes, and values: A theory of organization and change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

49.

Roschelle

J. M.

(1996). Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. In Koschmann

(Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 209—248). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

50.

Sandholtz

J. H.

Ringstaff

, & Dwyer

D. C.

(1997). Teaching with technology: Creating student-centered classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.

51.

Scardamalia

(2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In Smith

(Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 76—98). Chicago: Open Court.

52.

Scardamalia

(2004). CSILE/Knowledge Forum®. In Education and technology: An encyclopedia (pp. 183—192). Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.

53.

Scardamalia

, & Bereiter

(1996). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. In Koschmann

(Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 249—268). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

54.

Scardamalia

, & Bereiter

(1999). Schools as knowledge-building organizations. In Keating

, & Hertzman

(Eds.), Today's children, tomorrow's society: The developmental health and wealth of nations (pp. 274—289). New York: Guilford Press.

55.

Scardamalia

, & Bereiter

(2003). Knowledge building. In Guthrie

J. W.

(Ed.), Encyclopedia of education (2nd ed., pp. 1370—1373). New York: Macmillan Reference.

56.

Schellens

, & Valcke

(2005). Collaborative learning in asynchronous discussion groups: What about the impact on cognitive processing? Computers in Human Behaviour, 21, 957—976.

57.

Schellens

, & Valcke

(2006). Fostering knowledge construction in university students through asynchronous discussion groups. Computers and Education, 46, 349—370.

58.

Scott

(2000). Social network analysis: A handbook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

59.

Stahl

(2002). Rediscovering CSCL. In Koschmann

Halls

, & Miyake

(Eds.), CSCL 2: Carrying forward the conversation (pp. 169—181). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

60.

Stahl

(2004). Building collaborative knowing: Elements of a social theory of CSCL. In Strijbos

J. W.

Kirschner

P. A.

, & Martens

R. L.

(Eds.), What we know about CSCL and implementing it in higher education (pp. 53—86). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

61.

Stake

R. E.

(2000). Case study. In Denzin

N. K.

, & Lincoln

Y. S.

(Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 435—454). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

62.

Sykes

(1999). Teaching and student learning: Strengthening their connection. In Darling-Hammond

, & Sykes

(Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 151—180). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

63.

Tripp

(2004). Teachers’ networks: A new approach to the professional development of teachers in Singapore. In Day

, & Sachs

(Eds.), International handbook on the continuing professional development of teachers (pp. 191—216). Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.

64.

van den Berg

(2002). Teacher's meaning regarding educational practice. Review of Educational Research, 72, 577—626.

65.

Wallace

R. M.

(2003). Online learning in higher education: A review of research on interactions among teachers and students. Education, Communication and Information, 3, 241—280.

66.

Wells

(1999). Dialogic inquiry: Toward a sociocultural practice and theory of education. New York: Cambridge University Press.

67.

Wideen

Mayer-Smith

, & Moon

(1998). A critical analysis of the research on learning to teach: Making the case for an ecological perspective on inquiry. Review of Educational Research, 68, 130—178.

68.

Wilson

S. M.

, & Berne

(1999). Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: An examination of research on contemporary professional development. Review of Research in Education, 24, 173—209.

69.

Woodruff

, & Brett

(1999). Collaborative knowledge building: Preservice teachers and elementary students talking to learn. Language and Education, 13, 280—302.

70.

Yamagata-Lynch

L. C.

(2003). How a technology professional development program fits into teachers’ work life. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 591—607.

71.

Yuen

(2003). Fostering learning communities in classrooms: A case study of Hong Kong schools. Education Media International, 40, 153—162.

72.

Zhao

Pugh

Sheldon

, & Byers

J. L.

(2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations. Teachers College Record, 104, 482—515.

73.

Zhao

, & Rop

(2001). A critical review of the literature on electronic networks as reflective discourse communities for inservice teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 6 2, 81—94.