Positionality is an often overlooked but strategic practice for analyzing race and racism within the organizational bounds of predominantly White institutions of higher education. Positionality is critical self-reflection that uncovers the tensions and areas of strength found in relationships among the researcher, the research topic, the study participants, and the data analysis process. I argue that the researcher's practice of interrogating and articulating their personal and professional knowledge, values, beliefs, experiences, and embedded assumptions about race and racism can also be applied to a practitioner who plans to engage in dismantling systemic racial inequities in higher education. This chapter will illustrate how individuals embedded within institutions of higher education can interrogate their own positions within racist organizational contexts; attend to power dynamics as educational leaders, narrators, and subjects of inquiry; and commit to transformational practice that can address Latina/o/x educational inequities.
References
1.
AguirreA.Jr. (2000). Women and minority faculty in the academic workplace: Recruitment, retention, and academic culture [Special issue]. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 27(6).
2.
AnzaldúlaG. (Ed.). Making face, making soul, hacienda caras: Creative and critical perspectives by feminists of color. San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute Books.
3.
BerryK., & ClairR. P. (2011). Contestation and opportunity in reflexivity: An introduction. Cultural Studies: Critical Methodologies, 11(2), 95–97).
4.
BlimlingG., WhittE., & Associates. (1998). Principles of good practice for student affairs: Statement and inventories. American College Personnel Association & National Association for Student Personnel Administrators: Washington, DC.
5.
BoylornR. M. (2011). Gray or for colored girls who are tired of chasing rainbows: Race and reflexivity. Cultural studies: Critical methodologies, 11(2), 178–186).
6.
CalafellB. M., & MoremanS. T. (2009). Envisioning an academic readership: Latina/o performativities per the form of publication. Text and Performance Quarterly, 29(2), 123–130).
7.
ChavezC. (2008). Conceptualizing from the inside: Advantages, complications, and demands on insider positionality. The Qualitative Report, 13(3), 474–494).
8.
EmirbayerM., & DesmondM. (2012). Race and reflexivity. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 35(4), 574–599).
9.
EspinoM. M. (2012). Seeking the “truth” in the stories we tell: The role of critical race epistemology in higher education research. Review of Higher Education, 36(1), 31–67).
10.
EspinoM. M. (2014). Exploring the role of community cultural wealth in graduate school access and persistence for Mexican American Ph.Ds. American Journal of Education, 120(4), 545–574).
11.
EspinoM. M. (2016). The value of education and educación: Nurturing Mexican American children's educational aspirations to the doctorate. Journal of Latinos and Education, 15(2), 73–90).
12.
EspinoM. M., MuñozS., & Marquez KiyamaJ. (2010). Transitioning from doctoral study to the academy: Theorizing trenzas of identity for Latina sister scholars. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 804–818).
13.
EspinoM. M., SalazarC., & MorinM. F. (2016, November 11). “I've always wanted to be a dean of students”: Exploring the pathways to senior leadership for Latina/o student affairs administrators. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education: Columbus, OH.
14.
EspinoM. M., VegaI., RendónL. I., RaneroJ., & MuñizM. M. (2012). The process of reflexión in bridging testimonios across lived experience. Equity & Excellence in Education, 45(3), 444–459). doi:10.1080/10665684.2012.698188
15.
EspinozaL. G. (1990). Masks and other disguises: Exposing legal academia. Harvard Law Review, 103, 1878–1886).
16.
FryR., & TaylorP. (2013). Hispanic school drop-out rate at record low: Hispanic high school graduates pass whites in rate of college enrollment. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.
17.
GonzálesL. D., MurakamiE., & NúlñezA. (2013). Latina faculty in the labyrinth: Constructing and contesting legitimacy in Hispanic serving institutions. Educational Foundations, 27(1/2), 65–89).
18.
HarperS. (2011). Strategy and intentionality in practice. In SchuhJ.H., JonesS.R., HarperS.R., & Associates (Eds.), Student services: A handbook for the profession (5th ed., pp. 287–302)). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
19.
JohnsrudL. K., & SadaoK. C. (1998). The common experience of otherness: Ethnic and racial minority faculty. Review of Higher Education, 21(4), 315–3-342).
20.
JonesS. R., TorresV., & ArminioJ. (2014). Negotiating the complexities of qualitative research in higher education: Fundamental elements and issues (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
21.
KimballE. W., & RyderA. J. (2014). Using history to promote reflection: A model for reframing student affairs practice. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 51(3), 298–310).
22.
KobayashiA. (2003). GPC ten years on: Is self-reflexivity enough?Gender, Place & Culture, 10(4), 345–349).
23.
KohlE., & McCutcheonP. (2015). Kitchen table reflexivity: Negotiating positionality through everyday talk. Gender, Place & Culture, 22(6), 747–763).
24.
Latina Feminist Group. (2001). Telling to live: Latina feminist testimonios. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Martínez AlemánA. M. (1995). Actuando. In PadillaR.V., & Chávez ChávezR. (Eds.), The leaning ivory tower: Latino professors in American universities (pp. 67–76)). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
OrtegaM. (2016). In-between: Latina feminist phenomenology, multiplicity, and the self. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
30.
ReasonR. D., & BroidoE. M. (2011). Philosophies and values. In SchuhJ.H., JonesS.R., HarperS.R., & Associates (Eds.), Student services: A handbook for the profession (5th ed., pp. 80–95)). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
31.
ReasonR., & KimballE. (2012). A new theory-to-practice model for student affairs: Integrating scholarship, context, and reflection. Journal of Student Affairs Research & Practice, 49(4), 359–376).
ScheurichJ. J., & YoungM. D. (1997). Coloring epistemologies: Are our research epistemologies racially biased?Educational Researcher, 26(4), 4–16).
34.
TurnerC. S. V. (2002). Women of color in academe: Living with multiple marginality. Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 74–93).
35.
ValenciaR. R., & BlackM. S. (2002). “Mexican Americans don't value education!” On the basis of the myth, mythmaking, and debunking. Journal of Latinos and Education, 1(2), 81–103).
