ChallJeanne S.Learning to Read: The Great Debate.New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1967.
7.
DowningJ. A.Evaluating the Initial Teaching Alphabet.London: Cassell, 1967.
8.
FriesCharles C.Linguistics and Reading.New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1962.
9.
FriesCharles C., WilsonRosemary G., and RudolphMildred K.Merrill Linguistic Readers, A Basic Program.Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill Books, 1966.
10.
GoldbergLynn, and RasmussenDonaldThe Basic Reading Series.Chicago: Science Research Associates, 1965.
11.
HannaP. R., HannaJean S., HodgesR. E., and RudorfE. H.Jr.Phoneme-Grapheme Correspondences as Cues to Spelling Improvement.U.S. Office of Education Research Program Monograph 16. Washington: Government Printing Office, 1966.
12.
LeFevreCarl A.Linguistics and the Teaching of Reading.New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1964.
13.
LobanWalterProblems in Oral English.Champaign, Ill.: National Council of Teachers of English, 1966.
14.
MartinBillJr.Sounds of Language Readers.New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1966.
15.
MazurkiewiczAlbert J.The Initial Teaching Alphabet in Reading Instruction. (Lehigh-Bethlehem Evaluation-Demonstration Project on the Use of i. t. a.) Comprehensive Final Report, February, 1967.
16.
RobinettRalph F.Miami Linguistic Readers.Miami: Board of Public Instruction, 1964.
17.
Roundtable review of Hanna, et al. Phoneme—Grapheme Correspondences as Cues to Spelling Improvement (11): A. Hood Roberts, “A Review by A Specialist in the Uses of Computers in Linguistics Research,” pp. 201–7 and ReedDavid W., “A Review by a Specialist in Dialectology,” pp. 207–15, Research in the Teaching of English, Fall, 1967.
18.
RuddellRobert B. “Reading Instruction in First Grade with Varying Emphasis on the Regularity of Grapheme-Phoneme Correspondences and the Relation of Language Structure to Meaning—Extended into Second Grade,” The Reading Teacher, XX (May, 1967), 730–39.