School Characteristics Inventory: Investigation of a Quantitative Instrument for Measuring the Modifiability of School Contexts for Implementation of Educational Innovations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to collect reliability and validity data on the School Characteristics Inventory (SCI), a quantitative measure based on Sternberg's (2000) theory of contextual modifiability. Data were collected from a national sample of middle school teachers and from teachers participating in a 3-year study investigating teachers’ willingness to implement differentiated instruction or differentiated authentic assessments. Factor analysis indicated 6 factors (School Reputation, General School State, Staff Attitudes, Responsiveness to Change, General Perceptions of the School, and Administration Responsiveness), accounting for 42% of the variance. Reliability estimates of the factors ranged from a low of .76 (Responsiveness to Change) to a high of .94 (School Reputation and SCI Total Scale Score). Quantitative and qualitative data give credence to the reliability and validity of the SCI and tentatively support the organizational modifiability construct theorized by Sternberg.

References

Abell

D. J.

(2000, November). Differentiation of instruction for disadvantaged gifted students: A systemic change model. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Bowling Green, KY. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED 452 651)

Bulach

& Malone

(1994). The relationship of school climate to the implementation of school reform. ERS Spectrum, 12(4), 3–8.

Brighton

C. M.

, Hertberg

H. L.

, Moon

T. R.

, Tomlinson

C. A.

, & Callahan

C. M.

(in press). Feasibility of high-end learning in the diverse middle school. Storrs: University of Connecticut, National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.

Coleman

M. R.

, & Gallagher

J. J.

(1995). The successful blending of gifted education with middle schools and cooperative learning: Two studies. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 18, 362–384.

Cronbach

L. J.

(1970). Essentials of psychological testing (3rd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.

Glaser

, & Strauss

A. L.

(1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.

Goodlad

J. I.

, & Oakes

(1988). We must offer equal access to knowledge. Educational Leadership, 45, 16–22.

Johnston

J. A.

, Bickel

W. F.

, & Wallace

R. C.

(1990). Building and sustaining change in the culture of secondary schools. Educational Leadership, 47(8), 46–48.

Kulik

, & Kulik

C. L.

(1992). Meta-analytic findings on grouping programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 73–77.

10.

Manning

B. A.

(1976). The “trouble shooting” checklist (TSC) for school-based settings. Unpublished manuscript, University of Texas.

11.

Oakes

(1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

12.

Peterson

A. M.

(1997). Aspects of school climate: A review of literature. ERS Spectrum, 15(1), 36–42.

13.

Robinson

(1991). Cooperative learning and the academically talented student: Research-based decision-making series (Report No. NRC-G/T-9106). Storrs: University of Connecticut, National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented,.

14.

Schweiker-Marra

K. E.

(1995). The principal's role in changing school culture and implementing school reform. ERS Spectrum, 13(3), 3–11.

15.

Stepien

W. J.

, Gallagher

S. A.

, & Workman

(1993). Problem-based learning for traditional and interdisciplinary classrooms. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16, 338–357.

16.

Sternberg

(2000). Making school reform work: A “mineralogical” theory of school modifiability. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa.

17.

Stevens

M. P.

(1990). School climate and staff development: Keys to school reform. NASSP Bulletin, 74(529), 66–70.

18.

Strauss

A. L.

, & Corbin

(1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

19.

Stronge

J. H.

, & Jones

C. W.

(1991). Middle school climate: The principal's role in influencing effectiveness. Middle School Journal, 22(5), 41–44.

20.

VanTassel-Baska

, Bass

, Ries

, Poland

, & Avery

(1998). A national study of science curriculum effectiveness with high-ability students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 200–211.

21.

Vesiland

E. M.

, & Jones

M. G.

(1998). Gardens or graveyards: Science education reform and school culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 757–775.

22.

Watson

(2000). Promising practices: What does it really take to make a difference? School Effectiveness & School Improvement, 11, 453–457.