New and extended rights for performers have been introduced into UK copyright law as a result of EC Directives. It is widely supposed that they will make performers better off. In this article we attempt to test that assumption by analysing these changes with the focus on the music industry. We discuss the role of collecting societies in implementing these rights, and speculate on the costs of collection, the potential value of the rights and who will pay for them. Evidence is presented for the UK with references to Denmark and Sweden. We conclude that it is not obvious that all performers will be better off as a result.
References
1.
British Invisibles (1995) Overseas Earnings of the Music Industry.London: British Invisibles.
2.
British Video Association (1996) The British Video Association Yearbook 1996.London: British Video Association.
3.
The Copyright and Related Rights Regulation 1996, Cm. 2967. (1996) London: HMSO.
4.
Dane, Cliff (1995) The UK Record Industry Annual Survey 1995.Weston-super-Mare: Media Research Publishing Ltd.
5.
EC Directive (1992) On Rental Right and Lending Right and on Certain Rights Related to Copyright in the Field of Intellectual Property. 92/100/EEC. Luxembourg.
6.
Ehrlich, Cyril (1989) Harmonious Alliance. A History of the Performing Right Society.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7.
Equity (1993) Equity/PACT Agreement for Cinema Films (1 July). London: Equity.
8.
Equity (1996a) Sample film contract. Mimeo.
9.
Equity (1996b) Letter from Angela Lyttle, 16 Feb.
10.
Mechanical Copyright Protection Society (MCPS) (1996) In Brief, March.
11.
Monopolies and Mergers Commission (1988) Collective Licensing. Cm. 530. London: HMSO.
12.
Monopolies and Mergers Commission (1994) The Supply of Recorded Music, Cm. 2599. London: HMSO.
13.
Monopolies and Mergers Commission (1996) Performing Rights, Cm. 3147. London: HMSO
14.
Music Publishers' Association Limited and Mechanical Copyright Protection Society Limited (1994) Report and Accounts.London: MPA Ltd.
