This research examines how a particular idea, the opiate receptor concept, was incorporated into the work of a group of scientists. It focuses on the period of time during which the idea, previously a mere abstraction, began to receive experimental support. The study analyzes how various groups of researchers within neuroscience used the early experimental results, and how the growing understanding of the receptor contributed to a sense of momentum in the field.
References
1.
ANONYMOUS
(1981) “Changing fashions can make sense.”Nature293 (5833): 517.
2.
COZZENS, S. E.
(forthcoming) Social Control and Multiple Discovery in Science: The Opiate Receptor Case. Albany: State University of New York Press.
3.
FLECK, L.
(1979) Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1935)
4.
GARFIELD, E.
(1979) “Controversies over opiate receptor research typify problems facing awards committees.”Current Contents1979 (20): 5-19.
5.
GILBERT, G. N.
(1976) “The transformation of research findings into scientific knowledge.”Social Studies of Sci.6: 281-306.
6.
GILBERT, G. N.
(1977) “Referencing as persuasion.”Social Studies of Sci.7: 113-122.
7.
GOLDSTEIN, A.
, L. I. LOWNEY, and B. K. PAL (1971) “Stereospecific and non-specific interactions of the morphine congener levorphanol in subcellular fractions of mouse brain.”Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. US68: 1742-1747.
8.
KUHN, T. S.
(1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
9.
LATOUR, B.
and S. WOOLGAR (1979) Laboratory Life. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
10.
LORD, J.A.H.
, A. WATERFIELD, J. HUGHES, and H. KOSTERLITZ (1977) “Endogenous opioid peptides: multiple agonists and receptors.”Nature267: 495-499.
11.
MERTON, R. K.
(1973) “The normative structure of science,” in The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press. (Original work dated 1942)
12.
PERT, C. B.
and S. H. SNYDER (1973) “Opiate receptor: demonstration in nervous tissue.”Science179: 1011-1014.
13.
SIMON, E. J.
, J. M. HILLER, and I. EDELMAN (1973) “Stereospecific binding of the potent narcotic analgesic [3H] etorphine to rat-brain homogenate.”Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. US70: 1947-1949.
14.
SMALL, H. G.
(1978) “Cited documents as concepts symbols.”Social Studies of Sci.8: 327-340.
15.
SMALL, H.
(1981) “Knowledge representation using co-citation clusters.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Washington, DC, October 25-30.
16.
SMALL, H.
and E. GREENLEE (1980) “Citation context analysis of a co-citation cluster: recombinant-DNA.”Scientometrics2 (4): 277-301.
17.
TERENIUS, L.
(1973) “Stereospecific interaction between narcotic analgesics and a synaptic plasma membrane fraction of rat cerebral cortex.”Acta Pharmacol. Toxicol. 32: 317-320.
18.
VOOS, H.
and K. S. DAGAEV (1976) “Are all citations equal? Or, did we Op. Cit. your Idem?”J. of Academic Librarianship1 (6): 19-21.