Important Variables in Reasoning about Social Rules

Abstract

In everyday life people produce and accept behaviours that deviate to some extent from a rule, but are nevertheless recognised as examples of the rule. This study analyses the effects of three variables, i.e. type of substitution, centrality of the element involved in the transgression, and linguistic formulation of rules, on judgements of acceptability and seriousness of such deviations.

Three groups of 60 subjects each (4-year-olds, 9-year-olds, and adults) were randomly assigned to receive one of three linguistic formulations of a prudential rule. In the first, the rule was stated without justification; in the second, the goal of the rule was stated; in the third, a description of the actions and the items necessary to obey the rule was given. All subjects had to judge a variety of rule transgressions based on elimination, unsuitable substitution or suitable substitution of a central or a peripheral element of the rule.

Linguistic formulation had, at best, a modest effect on judgements. However, there were strong effects of type of substitution and centrality. Moreover, the effects of these variables differed with age and the subjects showed an increasing capacity to take into account all the elements involved.

References

Barbieri, M.S. & Legrenzi, P. (1988a). Transgression: Some psychological aspects of social rules in preschool children . European Journal of Psychology of Education, 3, 329-342 .

Barbieri, M.S. & Legrenzi, P. (1988b). Regole regolative e regole costitutive: Tra filosofia e psicologia. [Regulative rules and constitutive rules: A problem in between psychology and philosophy] . Etd Evolutiva, 30, 13-22 .

Davidson, P. , Turiel, E. , & Black, A. (1983). The effect of stimulus familiarity on the use of criteria and justifications in children's social reasoning . British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1, 49-65 .

Donaldson, M. (1978). Children's minds. London: Fontana .

Dunn, J. (1988). The beginnings of social understanding. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press .

Dunn, J. (1991). Young children's understanding of other people: Evidence from observations within family. In D. Frye & C. Moore (Eds), Children's theories of mind. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

Galambos, J.A. (1986). Knowledge structure for common activities. In R.P. Abelson , J.A. Galambos , & J.B. Black (Eds), Knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

Haste, H. (1987). Growing into rules. In J. Bruner & H. Haste (Eds), Making sense: the child's construction of the world. London: Methuen .

Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: a cognitive developmental approach to socialization. In D.A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research. Chicago: Rand McNally .

10.

Laupa, M. (1991). Children's reasoning about three authority attributes: adult status, knowledge and social position . Developmental Psychology, 27, 321-329 .

11.

Miller, G.J. & Bersoff, M.D. (1988). When do American children and adults reason in social conventional terms? Developmental Psychology, 24, 366-375 .

12.

Nelson, K. (1986). Event knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. .

13.

Nucci, L. (1981). Conceptions of personal issues: a domain distinct from moral or societal concepts . Child Development, 52, 114-121 .

14.

Piaget, J. (1932). Le jugement moral chez l'enfant. Paris: Alcan.

15.

Rositi, F. (1986). Tipi e dimensioni dei sistemi normativi. [Types and dimensions of normative systems.] Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia, 27, 347-367.

16.

Searle, J.R. (1964). How to derive "Ought" from "Is" . Philosophical Review, 73, 43-58 .

17.

Siegel, L. (1978). The relation of language and thought in the preoperational child: A reconsideration of nonverbal alternatives to Piagetian tasks. In L. Siegel & C.J. Brainerd (Eds), Alternatives to Piaget: Critical essays on the theory. New York: Academic Press .

18.

Smetana, J.G. (1981). Preschool children's conceptions of moral and social rules . Child Development, 52, 1333-1336 .

19.

Tisak, M.S. & Turiel, E. (1984). Children's conception of moral and prudential rules . Child Development, 35, 1030-1039 .

20.

Tisak, M.S. & Turiel, E. (1988). Variation in seriousness of transgressions and children's moral and conventional concepts . Developmental Psychology, 24, 352-357 .

21.

Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge. Cambridge University Press .

22.

Winer, J.B. (1970). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill .