Copyright issues are significant for worldwide information sharing, while mutual understanding about the commonalities and differences among international copyright law articles is difficult due to the diversity of legal knowledge representation. The goal of our research is to propose an appropriate methodology and capture a uniform conceptual model that will provide semantic level representation for processing and modelling international legal knowledge using ontological technology. This paper proposes a preliminary intention-oriented legal knowledge model as a pivotal model that, from the viewpoint of intention behind the law, manages and models legal knowledge derived from international law documents. We develop a domain ontology — international copyright law ontology, which is used as a fundamental conceptual framework to maintain consistency among diverse legal knowledge representations.
B. Chandrasekaran , J.R. Josephson and V.R. Benjamins, What are ontologies, and why do we need them?Intelligent Systems and Their Applications, IEEE14(1) ( 1999) 20—26. [See also IEEE Intelligent Systems.]
2.
J.F., SowaKnowledge Representation: Logical Philosophical, and Computational Foundations (Brooks Cole, Pacific Grove, CA , 2000).
3.
T.J.M. Bench-Capon and P.R.S. Visser, Ontologies in legal information systems: the need for explicit specifications of domain conceptualizations . In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL'97, 30 June to 3 July, Melbourne, Australia, 1997 (ACM, New York, 1997) 132—41.
4.
R. Mizoguchi and M. Ikeda, Towards ontology engineering . In: D. Patterson et al. (eds), Proceedings of the Joint Pacific Asian Conference on Expert Systems/Singapore International Conference on Intelligent Systems (Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 1997) 259—66.
5.
R. Mizoguchi and J. Bourdeau, Using ontological engineering to overcome AI-ED problems, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education11(2) (2000) 107—21.
6.
W. Lu and M. Ikeda, An intention-oriented model of copyright law for e-learning: international semantic mapping of copyright laws based on a copyright ontology. In Mitsum Ikeda, Chee-kit Looi, and David Jonassen (eds): Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers in Education 2005 (IOS Press, Amsterdam , 2005) 757—60.
7.
W. Lu and M. Ikeda, International semantic mapping of copyright law: a conceptualization supporting system with capability of “intention” and ontology . In: J. Gu and G. Chroust (eds), Proceedings of the 1st World Congress of the International Federation for Systems Research, IFSR2005 (JAIST, Tatsunokuchi, Ishikawa, 2005) 205—12.
8.
W3C, Web Ontology Language (OWL) W3C recommendation (2004). Available at: www.w3.org/2004/OWL/ (accessed 10 May 2006).
9.
N. Guarino, Formal ontology in information systems. In: N. Guarino (ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems, FOIS'98, Ogunquit, USA (IOS Press, Amsterdam , 1998) 105—16.
10.
T.R. Gruber , Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing , International Journal of Human—Computer Studies43(5/6) (1995), 907—28.
11.
D.B. Lenat, CYC: a large-scale investment in knowledge infrastructure, Communications of the ACM38(11) (1995), 33—38.
12.
A.T. Schreiber , B.J. Wielinga and W.H.J. Jansweijer, The KACTUS view on the “O” word. In: D. Skuce et al. (eds), International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence: Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing (AAAI Press, Montreal, 1995).
13.
M. Uschold and M. Grüninger, Ontologies: principles, methods, and applications, Knowledge Engineering Review11(2) (1996) 93—155.
14.
W. Swartout , R. Patil, K. Knight and T. Russ, Towards distributed use of large-scale ontologies. In: B. Gaines and M. Musen (eds), The 10th Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop (KAW'96), Banff, Canada, 1996. Available at: http://ksi.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/KAW/KAW96/KAW96Proc.html (accessed 11 April 2007).
15.
G. Van Heijst , A. Schreiber and B.J. Wielinga, Using explicit ontologies in KBS development, International Journal of Human—Computer Studies46(2/3) (1997) 183—292.
16.
HOZO, Ontology Editor ( 1996). Available at: www.hozo.jp/ (accessed 8 May 2006).
17.
Wipo (2006). Available at: www.wipo.int/copyright/en/ (accessed 8 May 2006).
18.
R. Mizoguchi , Ontology engineering environments. In: S. Staab and R. Studer , (eds) 2003Handbook on Ontologies (Springer, Berlin, 2003 ).
19.
H. Kelsen, Pure Theory of Law (2nd edition) ( University of California Press, Berkeley , 1967).
20.
H. Kelsen, General Theory of Norms (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1991).
21.
T. McCarty, A language for legal discourse, I: basic structures. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on AI and Law ( ACM, 1989).
22.
A. Hamfelt and J. Barklund, Metaprogramming for representation of legal principles. In: M. Bruynooghe (ed.), Proceedings of Meta'90, the Second Workshop on Meta-Programming in Logic, Leuven, Belgium, April 1990 (DTAI , Leuven, 1990).
23.
L. Allen and C. Saxon, more ia needed in ai: interpretation assistance for coping with the problem of multiple structural interpretations. In: R. Susskind (ed.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on AI and Law (ACM, Oxford, 1991).
24.
L. Allen, The language of legal relations, RLL: useful in a legal ontology toolkit? In: P.R.S. Visser and R. Winkels (eds), Legal Ontologies: Proceedings of the ICAIL-97 Workshop (ACM, New York, 1997).
25.
A. Valente, Legal KnowledgeEngineering: a Modelling Approach (IOS Press, Amsterdam, 1995).
26.
A. Valente , J. Breuker and P. Brouwer, Legal modelling and automated reasoning with ON-LINE, International Journal of Human Computer Studies51(6) ( 1999) 1079—1126.
27.
J. Breuker, Constructing a legal core ontology: LRI-Core. In: H.S.F. Freitas and R. Volz (eds), Proceedings of WONTO-2004, Workshop on Ontologies and their Applications (LivroRapido, Sao Luis, Maranhao, 2004).
28.
J. Breuker and R. Hoekstra, Epistemology and ontology in core ontologies: FOLaw and LRI-Core, two core ontologies for law. In: A. Gangemi and S. Borgo (eds), Proceedings of the EKAW Workshop on Core Ontologies, 2004. Available at http://sunsite.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Publications/CEUR-WS/Vol-118/ (accessed 11 April 2007).
29.
Odrl (2000). Available at: http://odrl.net (accessed 26 July 2006).
30.
IPROnto (2003). Available at: http://dmag.upf.es/ontologies/ipronto/index.html (accessed 26 July 2006).
