This study seeks to understand the scientific communication activities of Libyan scientists, and their engagement with scientific publishing. The research embraces both formal and informal communication, and explores that behaviour in the context of a developing country, Libya. A mixed methods approach including desk research, a bibliometric study of recent scientific output, interviews with key informants, and a questionnaire survey with scientists is used to gather rich data and to generate deep insights into scientific communication behaviours. Findings suggest that Libyan scientists affirm the centrality of scientific communication to successful science, but that the nature of communication is influenced by national and other cultures, and in particular, Libyan scientists value informal scientific communication. They also both access and publish in e-journals and in open access sources but are aware of a range of barriers to scientific communication in the digital age.
Costa S., Meadows J.The impact of computer usage on scholarly communication among social scientists . Journal of Information Science2000; 26(4): 255-262.
2.
Halliday L.Scholarly communication, scholarly publication and the status of emerging formats. Information Research2001; 6(4), http://informationr.net/ir/6-4/paper111.html (2001 , accessed April 2011).
3.
Anon.Open access: scientific publishing and the developing world, http://www.firstauthor.org/Downloads/openaccess.pdf (accessed March 2011).
4.
Igun S.Implications for electronic publishing in libraries and information centres in Africa. The Electronic Library2005; 23(1): 82-91.
5.
Papin-Ramcharan JI, Dawe R.Open access publishing: a developing country view. First Monday11(6), http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/rt/view/1332/1252 (2006, accessed March 2011).
6.
Dulle FW, Mulimil RT, Matovelo DSApplication of information technology for research in Tanzania: feedback from agricultural researchers. Journal of Information Science2002; 28(2): 157-162.
7.
Ondari-Okemwa E.Challenges of harnessing virtual information resources in Kenya: the case of the African Virtual University. Journal of Information Science2002; 28(4): 321-329.
8.
Scupola A.The impact of electronic commerce on industry structure - the case of scientific, technical and media publishing. Journal of Information Science2002; 28(4): 275-284.
9.
Chan L., Kirsop B., Arunachalam S.Open access archiving: the fast track to building research capacity in developing countries. Science and Development Network, http://www.scidev.net/en/features/open-access-archiving-the-fast-track-to-building-r.html (2005, accessed March 2011).
10.
Borgman C. Scholarshipin the digital age: information, infrastructure, and the internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2007.
11.
Garvey WDCommunication: the essence of science; facilitating information exchange among librarians, scientists, engineers and students. Oxford : Pergamon Press, 1979.
12.
Meadows J.Communicating research. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1998.
13.
Swan A., Brown S.Open access self-archiving: an author study. Bristol: JISC, 2005.
14.
Barjak F.The role of the internet in informal scholarly communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology2006; 57(10): 1350-1367.
15.
Garvey WD , Griffith BCScientific communication: the dissemination system in psychology and a theoretical framework for planning innovations . American Psychologist1965; 20(2): 157-164.
16.
Hurd JMModels of scientific communication systems. In: Crawford S (ed.) Form print to electronic: the transformation of scientific communication. Meford, NJ: Information Today, 1996, pp. 9-33.
17.
Bjork CCA model of scientific communication as a global distributed information system . Information Research2007; 12(2), http://informationr.net/ir/12-2/p307.pdf (accessed March 2011).
18.
Guthrie KMSomething in the water: scholarly communications in a rapidly changing information economy. Serials2008; 21(2): 79-82.
19.
Russell JMScientific communication at the beginning of the twenty-first century. International Social Science Journal2001; 53(168): 271-282.
20.
Smith D.A parallel universe? Blogs, wikis, Web2.0 and a complicated future for scholarly communication. Serials2008; 21(1): 14-18.
21.
Ani OE , Biao EPGlobalization: its impact on scientific research in Nigeria. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science2005; 37(3): 153-160.
22.
Walsh JP, Kucker S., Maloney N., Gabbay S.Connecting minds: CMC and scientific work. Journal of the American Society for Information Science2000; 51(14): 1295-1305.
23.
Arunachalam S.Information for research in developing countries: information technology, a friend or foe?International Information and Library Review2003; 35(2): 133-147.
24.
Canhos VP, Canhos DA, Souza S, Kirsop B (eds) Electronic publishing and developing countries: trends, potential and problems. UNESCO Expert Conference on Electronic Publishing in Science. Paris: UNESCO, 1996.
25.
Chan L., Kirsop B.Open archiving opportunities for developing countries; towards equitable distribution of global knowledge. Ariadne2001; 30, http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue52/kirsop-et-al/ (accessed March 2011).
26.
Hirwade M. , Rajyalakshmi D.Open access: India is moving towards third world superpower. In: Proceedings of CALIBER2006. Gulberga: Inflibnet, 2006, pp. 1-13.
27.
Haider J.Of the rich and the poor and other curious minds: on open access and ‘development’. Aslib Proceedings2007; 59(4/5): 449-461.
28.
Smart P., Pearce C., Tonukari N.E-publishing in developing economies. Canadian Journal of Communication2004; 29(3): 329-341.
29.
Nasser R. , Abouchedid K.Problems and the epistemology of electronic publishing in the Arab world: the case of Lebanon. First Monday2001; 6(9), http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/886/795 (accessed 3 March 2011).
30.
Abubaker A.Influence of cultural core values on the communication behaviour of staff in Libyan organisation. Annual Review of Education, Communication and Language Sciences4, http://research.ncl.ac.uk/ARECLS/vol4_documents/ABUBAKER.pdf (2007, accessed March 2011).
31.
Samovar L., Porter R.Communication between cultures. Toronto: Thomson Learning, 2004.
32.
Hall E.The hidden dimension. New York: Anchor Books, 1969.
33.
Hofestede G.Culture’s consequences, comparing values, behaviours, institutions, and organizations across nations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 2003.
34.
Yousef DAIslamic work ethic: a moderator between organizational commitment and job satisfaction in cross-cultural context. Personnel Review2001; 30(1): 52-69.
35.
Twati JM, Gammack JGThe impact of organisational culture innovation on the adoption IS/IT: the case of Libya. Journal of Enterprise Information Management2007; 19(2): 175-191.
36.
Xia J.Scholarly communication in East and Southeast Asia: traditions and challenges . IFLA Journal2006; 32(2): 104-112.
37.
Research Affairs Department.Annual report of the national centre for scientific research. Tripoli: National Centre for Scientific Research, 2001.
38.
Research Affairs Department.Annual report of the national centre for scientific research. Tripoli: National Centre for Scientific Research, 2007.
39.
Bryman A.Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
40.
Denscombe M.The good research guide: for small scale research projects. Milton Keynes: Open University, 2003.
41.
Norton MJIntroductory concepts in information science. Medford, NJ: American Society for Information Science, Information Today, 2000.
42.
Research Affairs Department.Directory and book of abstracts 2001-2007 . Tripoli: National Centre for Scientific Research, 2008.
