This essay examines the humanitarian design movement's efforts to address the crushing need, social precarity, and ecological frailty that define global megacities. The aims and character of the humanitarian design movement have been shaped by both the ethical demands of antiglobalization struggles and the rise of nongovernmental organizations as a principal means of social service-delivery in the Global South. The emergent humanitarian design movement offers a compelling critique of the failure of mainstream architectural and industrial design practices to address profound human suffering. Champions of humanitarian design, however, offer a technological fix (e.g., life straws, paper log houses, and hippo rollers) for problems rooted in imperial histories and neoliberal restructuring. In failing to address the dynamics of structural underdevelopment, do-good design performs the grassroots ideological work of neoliberalism by promoting market values and autoregulation. Within the humanitarian-corporate complexes, the global poor are construed as objects of elite benevolence and non-profit largesse, rather than as historical subjects possessing their own unique worldviews, interests, and notions of progress. This essay concludes by briefl y sketching an alternative approach to self-determination for the poor where technological development is grounded in egalitarian cultures of anticapitalist social movements.
DavisM. (2004). Planet of slums: Urban involution and the informal proletariat. New Left Review, 26(March–April), 5–34.
13.
DavisM. (2006). Planet of slums.London: Verso.
14.
de SotoHernando (2000). The mystery of capital: Why capitalism triumphs in the West and fails everywhere else.New York: Basic Books.
15.
DenningM. (2010). Wageless life. New Left Review, 66(November–December), 79–97.
16.
Dyer-WithefordN. (1999). Cyber-Marx: Cycles and circuits of struggle in high-technology capitalism.Urbana & Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
17.
Dyer-WithefordN. (2001). Empire, immaterial labor, the new combinations and the global worker. Rethinking Marxism, 13(3–4), 70–80.
18.
FeenbergA. (2002). Transforming technology.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
GámezJosé L.S., & RogersSusan, (2008). An architecture of change. In BellB. & WakefordK. (Eds), Expanding architecture: Design as activism (pp. 18–25). New York: Metropolis Books.
20.
HardtMichael, & NegriAntonio (2004). Multitude: War and democracy in the age of empire.New York: Penguin Press.
21.
HarveyD. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
HawkenP., LovinsA., & LovinsH. (1999). Natural capitalism: Creating the next industrial revolution.New York: Little Brown and Company.
KingA. (2006). Building, architecture and the new international division of labor. In BrennerN. & KeilR. (Eds), The global cities reader (pp. 196–202). New York: Routledge.
25.
KleinN. (2007). The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism.New York: Picador.
26.
KramerM. (2006). Dispossessed: Life in our world's urban slums.Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books.
27.
KristoffM., & PanarelliL. (2010). Haiti: A republic of NGOs?United States Institute of Peace Brief, 23, 1–3.
28.
Lavaca Collective (2004). Sin patron: Stories from Argentina's worker-run factories.Chicago: Haymarket Books.
29.
LeCorbusier (1995). Vers Une Architecture.Paris: Flammarion.
30.
LindsayR. (2010). Haiti's excluded: How the earthquake aid regime sidelines those it is supposed to help. Nation, (21 March), 18–22.
31.
LoftusMargaret (2008, March). Caroline Baillie, an engineer campaigns on two fronts: Against poverty in Argentina and old-style teaching at home. Prism.
32.
McDonoughW., & BraugartM. (2002). Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things.New York: North Point Press.
MonteagudoGraciela (2008). The clean walls of a recovered factory: New subjectivities in Argentina's recovered factories. Urban Anthropology, 37(2), 175–210.
35.
NeuwirthR. (2006). Shadow cities: A billion squatters, a new urban world.New York: Routledge.
PenderJohn (2001). From “structural adjustment” to “comprehensive development framework”: Conditionality transformed?Third World Quarterly, 22, 397–411.
PillotonEmily, & KuruvillaJince (2009). The design revolution toolkit.San Rafael, CA: Project H Design and Blanchette Press.
44.
PithouseRichard (2006). Thinking resistance in the shanty town. Mute, 2(3), 16–31.
45.
Saad-FilhoA., & JohnstonD. (Eds). (2005). Neoliberalism: A critical reader.London: Pluto.
46.
SassenSaskia (2006). Cities in a world economy.Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
47.
ScottJames C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed.New Haven: Yale University Press.
48.
SinclairCameron (2006). Introduction: I hope it's a long list. In Architecture for Humanity (Ed.), Design like you give a damn: Architectural responses to humanitarian crises.New York: Metropolis Books.
SitrinM. (2006). Horizontalism: Voices of popular power in Argentina.Oakland, CA: AK Press.
51.
StohrKate (2006). 100 Years of humanitarian design. In Architecture for Humanity (Ed.), Design like you give a damn: Architectural responses to humanitarian crises.New York: Metropolis Books.
52.
TurnerJohn F.C. (1976). Housing by people: Towards autonomy in building environments.New York: Pantheon Books.
53.
VietaMarcelo (2010). Social innovations of autogestión in Argentina's worker-recuperated enterprises: Cooperatively reorganizing productive life in hard times. Labour Studies Journal, 35(3), 295–321.
54.
WacquantLoic (2007). Urban outcasts: A comparative sociology of advanced marginality.Cambridge, UK: Polity.
55.
WacquantL. (2009). Punishing the poor: The neoliberal government of social insecurity.Durham & London: Duke University.
56.
WacquantL. (2010). Class, race and hyperincarceration in revanchist America. Dœdalus, (Summer), 74–90.
57.
WaiteL. (2009). A place and space for a critical geography of precarity?Geography Compass, 3(1), 412–433.
58.
Waste for Life/Basura por vida/Lithoele tsa bophelo (2010). Retrieved January 6, 2010, from http://wasteforlife.org/
