This paper examines Computer-based Performance Monitoring (CBPM) in two UK financial services organizations. In doing so, it examines and critiques the existing manner in which this area has been theorized by both traditional and critical organization theorists. It then offers an alternative analysis of CBPM in terms of power, control and resistance, which involves the close interrogation of subject positioning within the speech of those who are subject to and manage this technology. By examining subject positions in interpretive repertoires, the paper demonstrates how power, control and resistance are constituted at an individual level and are specifically linked to the use (and abuse) of CBPM technology. It then further considers the nature and origins of the interpretive repertoires in relation to their organizational contexts, describing the differential circulation of disciplinary power in each. CBPM is thus understood as a politically neutral technology of power, which, when mobilized by management and discursively interwoven into practice becomes a potent force within local organizational sites. The central message of this paper is that it is possible to reveal the intertwining of individual and institutional discourses purely by examining technologies, practices and subjectivities in local organizational sites.
Alvesson, Mats 1998 `Taking the linguistic turn in organizational research: Challenges, responses and consequences'. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Organizational Discourses, Kings College, London.
2.
Attewell, Paul1987`Big Brother and the sweatshop: Computer surveillance in the automatic office' . Sociological Theory5: 87.
3.
Ball, Kirstie S. 1996 `Computer-based monitoring in UK service industries: A comparative study'. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Aston University.
4.
Ball Kirstie S. , and Chris Carter 1998 `The charismatic gaze'. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Organizational Discourses, Kings College, London.
5.
Burrell, Gibson1998`Modernism, postmodernism and organization theory: The contribution of Michel Foucault' in Foucault, management and organization theory. Alan McKinley and Ken Starkey (eds.), 32-55. London: Sage.
6.
Clegg, Stewart R.1994`Power relations and the constitution of the resistant subject' in Resistance and power in organizations. J.M. Jermier, D. Knights, D and W.R. Nord (eds.), 48-60. London: Routledge.
7.
Deetz, Stanley1992`Disciplinary power in the modern corporation' in Critical management studies. Mats Alvesson and Hugh Willmott (eds.), 27-39. London: Sage.
8.
Dreyfus, Hubert , and Paul Rabinow1986Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. Brighton: Harvester.
9.
Edley, Nigel , and Margaret Wetherell1997`Jockeying for position: the construction of masculine identities'. Discourse and Society8: 203-217.
10.
Edley, Nigel , and Margaret Wetherell1998`Negotiating hegemonic masculinity: Imaginary positions and psycho discursive practices'. Feminism and Psychology8: 35-47.
11.
Findlay, Paul , and Tim Newton1998`Re-framing Foucault: the case of performance appraisal' in Management and organization theoryAlan McKinlay and Ken Starkey (eds.), 211-229. London: Sage.
12.
Foucault, Michel1975Discipline and punish. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
13.
Foucault, Michel1977The history of sexuality, Vol. 1. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
14.
Gandy, Oscar H.1993The panoptic sort: A political economy of personal information. Boulder, CO: Westview.
15.
Gandy, Oscar H.1998`Coming to terms with the panoptic sort' in Computers, surveillance and privacy. David Lyon and Ela Zureik (eds.), 132-155. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.
16.
Gordon, Colin1982Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977. Brighton: Harvester.
17.
Henriques, Julian , et al.1998Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity. London: Routledge.
18.
Higgins, Christopher A. and Rebecca A. Grant1989Monitoring service workers via computer: The effect on employees. productivity and service'. National Productivity Review8/2: 101.
19.
Knights, David1990`Subjectivity, power and the labour process' in Labour process theory. D. Knights and Hugh Wilmott (eds.), 2-18. London: Macmillan.
20.
Knights, David1992`Changing spaces: The disruptive impact of a new epistemological location for the study of management' . Academy of Management Review17/3: 514-536.
21.
Knights, David and Glenn Morgan1990`Corporate strategy, organizations and subjectivity: a critique'. Organization Studies12/2: 252-273.
22.
Knights, David , and Theodore Vurdubakis1994`Foucault, power, resistance and all that' in Resistance and power in organizations. J.M. Jermier, D. Knights, and W.R. Nord (eds.), 167-198. London: Routledge.
23.
Knights David , and Hugh Willmott1985`Power and identity in theory and practice'. Sociological Review33/1: 22-46.
24.
Knights, David , and Hugh Willmott1993`"It's a very foreign discipline": The genesis of expenses control in a mutual life assurance company. British Journal of Management4: 1-18.
25.
Lyon, David1993`An electronic panopticon? A sociological critique of surveillance theory' . Sociological Review41/4: 653-678.
26.
Lyon, David1994The electronic eye. The rise of the surveillance society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
27.
McKinlay, Alan and Ken Starkey1998`Managing Foucault: Foucault, management and organization theory' in Foucault, management and organization theory. Alan McKinley and Ken Starkey (eds.), 22-35. London: Sage.
28.
Nine to Five1990Stories of mistrust and manipulation. The electronic monitoring of the American workforce. Cleveland, OH: National Association of Working Women.
29.
Poster, Mark1990The mode of information. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
30.
Potter, Jonathan , and Margaret Wetherell1987Discourse and social psychology; Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.
31.
Rule, James1998`High-tech workplace surveillance: What's really new?' in Computers, surveillance and privacy. David Lyon and Ela Zureik (eds.), 66-78. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.
Sewell, Graham1998`The discipline of teams: The control of team-based industrial work through electronic and peer surveillance' . Administrative Science Quarterly43/2: 397-428.
34.
Sewell, Graham , and Barry Wilkinson1992`Someone to watch over me: Surveillance and discipline and the JIT labour process'. Sociology26/2: 271.
35.
Shapiro, Michael1992Reading the postmodern polity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
36.
Smith, Michael J. , and Benjamin C.Amick1989`Electronic monitoring in the work-place: Implications for employee control and job stress' in Job control and worker health. C. Cooperet al. (eds.), 68-80. Chichester: Wiley.
37.
Townley, Barbara1994Reframing human resource management: Power ethics and the subject at work. London: Sage.
38.
United States Congress Office of Technology Assessment1987The electronic supervisor: New technologies, new tensions. Washington D.C.: US Congress Office of Technology Assessment.
39.
Westin, Alan 1988 `Electronic monitoring or clerical work on video display terminals: The organizational climate factor and models of good employee practice'. Contractor report for OTA (1987), Cit Nine to five (1990).
40.
Westin, Alan1992`Two key factors that belong in a macroergonomic analysis of electronic monitoring: Employee perceptions of fairness and the climate of organizational trust or distrust' . Applied Ergonomics23/1: 35-42.
41.
Wetherell, Margaret1998`Positioning and interpretive repertoires: Conversation analysis and post structuralism in dialogue' . Discourse and Society9/3: 387-412.
42.
Wetherell, Margaret , and Nigel Edley1998`Gender practices: Steps in the analysis of men and masculinities' in Standpoint and differences: Essays in the practice of feminist psychology. Karen Henwoodet al. (eds.), 35-49. London: Sage.
43.
Zuboff, Shoshana1988In the age of the smart machine. New York: Basic Books.
